Lee
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Messages
- 40,979
- Reaction score
- 61,634
- Points
- 148
I actually brought up the Jimmy Butler comparison for Culver earlier in the year, based on their per game averages in school, with the how they operate, being a multi-dimensional wing and being an okay shooter... Like @I'mWithDan mentioned, Butler wasn't relied upon offensively to the extent Culver has been and you can also see the difference in eras with the 3PA vs. FTr in their profiles..
Now, that's not to say I think Culver will be as good but Butler is a similar profile athlete and skill wise as Culver and that would be a good player for him to model his game after.. Neither have the burst laterally so they have to rely on being crafty and using their strength to create space offensively...
Problem I have with Culver is I just don't see anything that stands out... Sure he is pretty versatile and does have some good advanced defensive stats (but is it more Culver or Texas Tech?) but if you're drafting him in the top-5, you have to be pretty confident he'll be able to increase his efficiency at the next level... The bizarre thing is that he improved his free throw % and fg % but his 3p% dropped pretty dramatically in same volume as last year...
I think the attitude surrounding Culver is also more due to the huge drop-off after the top-3 and if you're looking at him as a top-5 option, with so much variability after the top-3, you're feeling a little bit disappointed with what a top-5 pick is expected to be and just missing out on the elite tier..
I have no doubt Culver will be a good player at the next level but will he be role player/rotational good or upper level starter good?
To me, if I'm betting on a wing to take the jump at the next level, I feel more comfortable betting on Nickeil Alexander-Walker...
Culver is over rated. Their burgers are good, but custard is way to rich for me, I prefer just good ole fashion ice cream.