Again, you can make a claim that some vague portion is true sort of, but none of his statements were true. And to say "generally right" is a massive fucking stretch. I mean, you're making a point about the media cycle and Trump's strategy here, which I get, but do you actually defend what he's doing and saying? Like, do you think it's okay for him to lie so blatantly?
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
"Why do you say that I have to apologize? I’m just quoting the newspaper, just like I quoted the judge the other day, Judge Napolitano,
I quoted Judge Napolitano, just like I quoted Bret Baier, I mean Bret Baier mentioned the word wiretap. Now he can now deny it, or whatever he is doing, you know. But I watched Bret Baier, and he used that term. I have a lot of respect for Judge Napolitano, and he said that three sources have told him things that would make me right. I don’t know where he has gone with it since then. But I’m quoting highly respected people from highly respected television networks."
I'm literally doing what Trump does in my "digression." Absolutely equivalent. In fact, nowadays EVERYTHING is fucking equivalent because we don't have to take the president at his word.
