If lebron did not get it when his team was not ranked high enough but he was doing everything, why should this year stat stuffing guards be rewarded?
Eric Gordon and Pat Beverly have been more consistently good than Ariza and Capela... so yeah... that team has no business being a three-seedI've got Harden. That team has no business being 3rd in the West with a gaudy record. He's the only all-star caliber player on the team and there's no else even close. Second best player is either Trevor Ariza or Clint Capela. 21-7?? That's crazy. I didn't think they'd make the playoffs this season, let alone look like friggin contenders.
Durant is not a part of this MVP raceLast night was pretty good example of how insane this years race is:
Lebron: 26, 7, 9 on 50%, with 2 steals and 2 blocks to boot
Harden: 29, 8, 12 in an OT barnburner against Minny
Westbrook: 26, 11, 22(!!!) against Phoenix
Durant: 34, 11, 4 on buttfucking 11-13 shooting, going 4-5 from 3 in 30 minutes against Portland
Durant is not a part of this MVP race
He has literally 0 case. He isn't even necessarily the MVP of his team. And the team had MORE success last year without him
There's just no need to even watch him
Durant is not a part of this MVP race
He has literally 0 case. He isn't even necessarily the MVP of his team. And the team had MORE success last year without him
There's just no need to even watch him
I agree here. More of my point was regarding right now. I think Harden has a slight lead currently, even if it's ridiculous because LBJ is straight-up better. It just seems to me that Harden is doing more night-in and night-out (again, obviously LBJ does more for the Cavs, but our team is good enough where he can "chill mode" and we still win; until Houston got Beverly back, they were god awful without Harden).
Agreed, and ultimately I think this is an academic discussion. I doubt Houston or OKC gets a 3 seed or better... So unless someone really has a surprise second-half, I think it is LBJ's award to lose.
Only part of your post I (respectfully) disagree with. I'd be down for a $5 gentlemen bet, donated to the site of course, regarding OKC making the playoffs. I understand if you do not want to, though, no hard feelings.
I looked at the rest of the standings in the West and didn't realize how bad it was. After I made that post. So yes, they will make the playoffs. I don't think they'll finish above .500. If they do, you got to seriously consider Westbrook though, because that roster is dog shit.
It depends on how you feel about some of those players. Personally, Oladipo is a nice player. And that's about all he is. A nice, little player. I'd rather have Trevor Ariza on most teams. Better all around player.
Steven Adams is the best player either guy has, though.
That's the thing though, 'cause who has the better supporting cast between Harden and Westbrook? Sure, the Thunder look bad, but they have some really nice players there as well in Dipo, Adams and Kanter, etc. At the same time I'm looking at the Rockets and that Roster is just absolutely void of talent as well, yet Harden makes them all look golden with how well his playing. Conversely I feel like Westbrook makes the rest of the Thunder look terrible.
That's the thing though, 'cause who has the better supporting cast between Harden and Westbrook? Sure, the Thunder look bad, but they have some really nice players there as well in Dipo, Adams and Kanter, etc. At the same time I'm looking at the Rockets and that Roster is just absolutely void of talent as well, yet Harden makes them all look golden with how well his playing. Conversely I feel like Westbrook makes the rest of the Thunder look terrible.