KI4MVP
formerly LJ4MVP
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2005
- Messages
- 31,156
- Reaction score
- 41,032
- Points
- 148
I find it really, really odd that nobody would have called the police immediately upon the guard being shot, but I suppose it is possible. And I also don't understand the logic of what that guy said. So if they knew a guard had been shot, they would have rushed more quickly the guy who was blasting away with automatic weapons? Why wouldn't the blasting away with automatic weapons alone be enough to impart that sense of urgency?
The truth is that given them backing off the last timeline, I don't really have much faith in this one either. So, this is one of those things where I think we're going to have to wait until they get their shit in one sock and produce some kind of comprehensive report, likely with federal involvement.
I'm not accusing anyone of anything nefarious, or suggesting a conspiracy. I think this was such a shocking event that normal procedures in terms of logging events, etc., in a timely manner was not done correctly, so they are trying to construct a timeline based on recollections, and perhaps watches that were not entirely accurate.
it does, but it doesn't tell them where the shooter was. knowing the security guard was shot would give them the location. The question is did he have a way to tell them right away that he had been shot and his location?