Here is the latest from BW....
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/trade_deadline/
Talking serious about Shaq.
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/trade_deadline/
Talking serious about Shaq.
Cavs being exetremely active going down to the wire, talking serious about Shaquille O'Neal
by Brian Windhorst/Plain Dealer Reporter
Thursday February 19, 2009, 11:28 AM
TORONTO -- From the people around the league I am talking to today, the Cavs are one of the most aggressive teams at this point. They are convinced that they have an advantage as a buyer and do not want to let a chance slip past as teams everywhere are looking to sell.
Several reliable sources have told me they have offered Ben Wallace and Sasha Pavlovic (only $1 million guaranteed) for Shaquille O'Neal. The Suns may want to keep Amare Stoudemire but now have abandoned their plans to play slow down and Shaq is in the way. Also, it would save them millions next season because Wallace's contract actually decreases next season and Pavlovic is not fully guaranteed.
This would be a massive transition for the Cavs, not exactly the sort of deal that doesn't alter the chemistry. I have no idea what it would do to the lineup but I do know Shaq has four championship rings, is having an All-Star season, has an expiring contract next year and has an excellent relationship with LeBron.
Over the last few days I've had people throw water on a lot of potential Cavs moves. This one, though, seems to be getting traction right now.
Also, the Cavs are re-freshing talks for Richard Jefferson to see if the Bucks will bite. The latest I heard was that Milwaukee is hoping for a better offer elsewhere.
Stay tuned.
http://www.cleveland.com/cavs/index.ssf/2009/02/cavs_being_hugely_active_going.html
I feel like Shaq would be a desperation move, just my opinion
If we are looking to cash in next season when teams might start selling off pieces for the 2010 offseason, Ben might be more valuable because it would be easier to match up salaries.
I created a Windhorst tracker for the day, so this can be discussed there.
Thanks.
I like the idea of having Shaq but I don't like giving up Big Ben and Sasha to get it done. That totally messes with the chemistry of the team.
So he said Ben and Sasha for Shaq being discussed?
The interesting part about the Shaq trade is that we would still have Wally's contract to still move...