Walter White
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 11, 2008
- Messages
- 25,548
- Reaction score
- 19,211
- Points
- 123
But those are still filled roster spots right? Won't JJ, Bird, RJ or anyone else have to be replaced with minimum contracts or cap holds? There will be at least 5 open roster spots on the team. That is an extra 4-5 million regardless. And Shump is closer to 10 mil.Here's my take on all this, and I'm not using exact figures, just ballpark guesstimates to demonstrate why the tax implications should really be a consideration here:
Gay would likely make around $18-20M; average it to $19 for the sake of argument... I think this is reasonable since he'll likely use the Luol Deng contract as a starting point in negotiations.
Shump will make nearly $11M next year, RJ $2.5M. That's $13.5M.. Jones and Anderson will be gone, that's $3M, total $16.5M..
The difference between this team with Gay, versus this team with Shumpert and Jefferson plus 1 guy who never plays and another who is medically retired is about ~$2.5M (w/12 guys on the roster)..
If we could upgrade to Rudy Gay for an additional $2.5M to even $5M (Gay @ $21M+), the Cavs should do that every day, all day.
So we will be about 20 mil over the luxury tax line replacing Shump for Gay assuming we fill in the 5 extra spots with minimums. Which doesn't include using any MLE's, re-signing Korver, TPE's, etc. Not even whatever Kyrie or Love's new numbers are if they change. This is 20 mil over the luxury tax line bare minimum right? I mean Gay might even make more. I'm not sure how much that equates to in luxury tax (close to 100 mil or more?), but I'm pretty sure our FO isn't going to pay it for Rudy Gay being honest. He is going to need to take a discount probably, if you want to call it a discount. I think 15 mil a year is a more fair price anyway.
Maybe I am wrong which is possible. But it doesn't seem as feasible as you make it sound.