• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Trump's Presidency

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Status
Not open for further replies.
Maybe you don't know but the insurance companies were the ones that suggested free birth control. As a business they think that it's a good idea capitalistically to prevent births. So what possible reason could you have against it?. That's what they want to do with their business why won't you allow them.

Then why don't the insurance companies pay for it!!?!? I'd be all for it. Your line of reasoning that it's cheaper for the taxpayers to subsidize birth control to help the insurance companies makes no sense.
 
Tell them to move out of those liberal shithole cities.

I've lived in several places, met a lot of women, spent a lot of time at college and at strip clubs.. guys are a fucking problem,often. Regardless of the city
 
He didn't say he's taking off. Taking off means leaving or going on vacation. The National Park Service doesn't release numbers so there's no way of you knowing

Yes they do. Here's how I know:

"It's hard to gauge crowd sizes and the National Park Service, which oversees the National Mall, doesn't offer estimates of any sort." - CNN AKA FAKE NEWS

I actually did mix up where the figures come from. Here's Newsweek:

"As of 11 a.m. ET on Friday, Metro counted 193,000 rides, less than half the 513,000 it counted in 2009 and far fewer than the 317,000 it did for Obama’s second inauguration, in 2013. On Saturday, Metro counted 275,000 trips before 11 a.m., also surpassing the figure from the previous morning."

We can also, you know, SEE the difference in crowd size. SO THERE ARE WAYS OF KNOWING. Pretending we have to be ignorant doesn't stop others from learning facts.



As for the semantics of 'taking off,' what the hell are you talking about? Taking a weekend off doesn't necessarily mean going anywhere. And that's certainly not the context in which Bob was using it.

EDIT: When are we gonna get a "rolls eyes" rating so I can stop using useful and creative ironically?
 
Yes they do. Here's how I know:

"It's hard to gauge crowd sizes and the National Park Service, which oversees the National Mall, doesn't offer estimates of any sort." - CNN AKA FAKE NEWS

I actually did mix up where the figures come from. Here's Newsweek:

"As of 11 a.m. ET on Friday, Metro counted 193,000 rides, less than half the 513,000 it counted in 2009 and far fewer than the 317,000 it did for Obama’s second inauguration, in 2013. On Saturday, Metro counted 275,000 trips before 11 a.m., also surpassing the figure from the previous morning."

We can also, you know, SEE the difference in crowd size. SO THERE ARE WAYS OF KNOWING. Pretending we have to be ignorant doesn't stop others from learning facts.



As for the semantics of 'taking off,' what the hell are you talking about? Taking a weekend off doesn't necessarily mean going anywhere. And that's certainly not the context in which Bob was using it.

EDIT: When are we gonna get a "rolls eyes" rating so I can stop using useful and creative ironically?

Over 400,000 rides reported by Metro yesterday. Trump met with the CIA today.

Try again.
 

I thought it was great. It's irresponsible for someone to falsely state the Trump administration removed MLKJrs bust.

If you don't see how that's a problem, I'm not sure what to tell you. Racial tensions are at the level they are know due to that race baiting bullshit. It's a necessity that this administration calls out this shit.

It's a shame they have to though.
 
So if a go into Giant Eagle and show them my insurance card my insurance will cover it?

This is just a smart remark and when I say smart I mean dumb because I already said where you can get them.
 
Then why don't the insurance companies pay for it!!?!? I'd be all for it. Your line of reasoning that it's cheaper for the taxpayers to subsidize birth control to help the insurance companies makes no sense.

Insurance covers it. Employers that have religious issues had a problem with it. If you are for it, what are you arguing about? It is part of the ACA, so when it is repealed...
 
I thought it was great. It's irresponsible for someone to falsely state the Trump administration removed MLKJrs bust.

If you don't see how that's a problem, I'm not sure what to tell you. Racial tensions are at the level they are know due to that race baiting bullshit. It's a necessity that this administration calls out this shit.

It's a shame they have to though.

I was referring to the complaints about crowd size and blatant lying about it being the most watched inauguration ever.

But I thought Favreau made the best point:

View: https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/822957125445906433


View: https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/822957560151932928


View: https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/822957779610501120
 
There were hundreds of thousands of visitors to DC for the rally today, many I know flew in a few days ago. To say that all Friday public transit riders attended the inauguration is a clear Ignorantio Elenchi, and likely the reason the press secretary refused to take questions afterward.

I can't stress enough how rare it is for the press secretary to give a canned speech without taking questions afterward.
 
From December on Poland's descent into authoritarianism:

The dire warning issued by the departing president of Poland’s highest constitutional court was one that should frighten not only the Poles, but people of all democratic nations in which populist rulers have taken or threaten to take power. Andrzej Rzeplinski, whose term expired on Monday, said that the governing Law and Justice Party is systematically weakening the checks and balances provided by the courts, the press and other institutions, and is leading the country “on the road to autocracy.”

Once the model of post-Communist transition to democracy, Poland has taken a sharp swing backward. The “reforms” enacted by the nationalist, right-wing Law and Justice Party, which won a majority in Parliament in October 2015, have strengthened the power of the executive branch over the news media, state prosecutors and nongovernmental organizations, and have undermined the independence of the constitutional court. Most recently, the government has cracked down on public gatherings.

In protest, hundreds of thousands of Poles have taken to the streets, creating a political crisis. Opposition legislators have occupied Parliament chambers, while the government has temporarily banned the news media from covering the tumult inside.

The court, which rules on the constitutionality of legislation and government actions, has been from the outset a major target of Law and Justice and its leader, Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who holds no office but wields the real power. He has called the court “the bastion of everything in Poland that is bad” for obstructing what he sees as the popular will as interpreted and expressed by him and his party. The government’s latest assault on the court has been a series of laws that would weaken its oversight role.

Such disdain for the rule of law and basic civil rights has drawn anguished criticism not only from Mr. Rzeplinski and other Polish democrats — including Lech Walesa, the hero of Poland’s anti-Communist movement in the 1980s — but also from the European Commission, the Council of Europe and the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe. On Wednesday, the European Commission, the executive body of the European Union, ordered Poland to scrap the changes to the court, though stopping short of calling for punitive sanctions.

None of this has swayed Mr. Kaczynski, whose first stint in power a decade ago alongside his twin brother, Lech, who was killed in a plane crash in Russia in 2010, failed to advance his nationalist agenda.

As Mr. Walesa has noted, authoritarianism is a serious threat to democracy beyond Poland. Populist leaders, whether of the far right or the far left, have made major advances across Europe and in the United States, drawing on a widespread sense of alienation, discontent with ruling elites and anti-globalization and anti-immigration views.

In nearly every case, whatever their specific agendas, populist leaders claim to represent the will of “the people,” and therefore believe they are empowered to ride roughshod over any person, institution or law that gets in their way. That kind of thinking led to the terrible dictatorships of the 20th century, a fact that becomes more relevant by the day.
 
Bla bla let's have some fun in this thread.

@gourimoko, several part request:

1. Give me the most absurd political argument you can think of and then defend it

2. Can you come up with situations that cause strict adherence to a political ideology collapse on its face? Example, a week ago someone said don't ever do drugs, ever (right wing) and I came up with a hypothetical where a war vet is prescribed meds for injury or ptsd, gets hooked.. I made some quip about guns and war being awesome, just shoot them all, I forget and it sounds stupid now, but hopefully you get my point?

- I got close earlier with a liberal situation.. "acknowledging Any difference between sexes is sexist, so a guy that transitions entering the mma without hormone therapy can't be discussed because it acknowledges guys are biologically stronger, so a trans guy can't be questioned.. which somehow turned into "if Caitlyn Jenner is actually a female, he has to give up all of his Olympic medals because he competed in the wrong class.. he's actually female.. but, by admitting there's a difference is sexist to a lot of uninformed left"

^just silly stuff, not being serious here

3. Any statistics on how much people are more invested in politics today than Normal? It seems like fucking everybody has an opinion today..

4. I had another, let me think..
 
Last edited:
All I learned about crowd size is neither president could pack them in like the Cavs

giphy.gif
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top