Having said this, now I'm going to say this post I quoted is the pot calling the kettle black.
No, it's not.. It's simply pointing out a logical fallacy.. You can't make an argument on the basis of your own ignorance... and there's no point debating this in this thread - it's not up for debate. You can google it and learn about it in your free time.
If I am comprehending your words correctly, you are pretty much saying there is no way this transaction which boils down to replacing Delly for Dunleavy was anything other than a cold salary dump with no basketball considerations whatsoever, and that there is zero evidence to think otherwise.
I am saying the most rational, reasonable conclusion is the Cavs are cutting salary. Saying, well they might
not be, is not making an argument - it's stating the obvious.
My post, the one you quoted, isn't a matter of opinion. One can't make claims on the basis of ignorance. What is there to disagree with? Are you disagreeing with the notion itself, and if so, how? Is your contention that yes, you can make arguments from ignorance? If so, I'd like to hear it...
Yes there is no doubt that saving $20 million was a factor. And in a vacuum, with no-one coming back in, I could agree.
So, the Cavs are saving money?
But you talk about Dunleavy as though he is a steaming pile of shit.
However you qualitatively evaluate Dunleavy is irrevelant; you could've had them both. Dunleavy didn't require Delly being traded. That is, unless you think Delly is worth less than the Varejao TPE.
I beg to differ. You pretty much state that we have no idea how Dunleavy will perform,
Yeah, we don't.
WTF are you talking about? He has a long and solid track record to be used as evidence. Much more sample size than Delly.
Delly has played on our team, with our players, in our system, and is in his mid-twenties.
Dunleavy has never played on our team, with our players, in our system, and will be 36 by the time he plays a single game.
What the fuck are
you talking about?
How is this not apparent, unless we're disagreeing here just for the sake of it?
Dunleavy is money from behind the three point line,
Over the past 3 years, Dunleavy is shooting .394 from behind the arc.
Dellevodova, over the same period, is shooting .398 from behind the arc.
But let's move on to your next point...
with a career average equal to Delly's best season.
Which seems rather irrelevant since the last time he was able to manage such an average was in 2012 when he was 32, not 36.
Next argument?
But the guy is 6'9", not 6'3".
Yeah, that much is true... And Delly doesn't have a bad back, has greater lateral quickness, and can guard more positions.
He can get his shot off over most NBA players where Delly needs to have room.
You'd think there was stats to back up this argument right?
Let's take a look
Dunleavy's stats by defender range:
TIGHT (0-2) = 47.1 eFG%; 47.1% 2PT /
0 FGA from 3 (9.1% possessions)
TIGHT (2-4) = 43.0 eFG%; 43.5% 2PT / 27.8% 3PT (32.2% possessions)
What about when he's open?
OPEN (4-6) = 44.0 eFG%; 35.3% 2PT / 31.7% 3PT (33% possessions)
WIDE (6+) = 74.0 eFG%; 50% 2PT / 52.5% 3PT (25.7% possessions)
And Delly?
TIGHT (0-2) = 32.4 eFG%; 31.3% 2PT / 33.3% from 3 (10%)
TIGHT (2-4) = 41.4 eFG%; 41.6% 2PT / 26.9% from 3 (31.9%)
OPEN (4-6) = 52.2 eFG%; 42.9% 2PT / 40.2% from 3 (30.3%)
WIDE (7+) = 63.0 eFG%; 41.7% 2PT / 44.9% from 3 (27.8%)
So.. from behind the arc, and in tight defense; Delly has a significantly better chance of scoring a 3 point attempt; and this is a situation Delly and Dunleavy find themselves in roughly 40% of the time on each attempt.
Keep in mind, Delly's 3-point average is higher than Dunleavy's over the 3-years Delly has been in the league, on average.
Furthermore, it's important to note how these players create space.
Dunleavy is awful coming off the dribble with more than once bounce; whereas Delly can catch and shoot, or create for himself or others.
Creating shot opportunities: Dunleavy (dribbles vs efficiency)
Dunleavy:
0 dribbles = 59.1% eFG / 40.2% 2PT / 46.5% 3PT (67.4% of possessions)
1 dribble = 47.1% eFG / 43.5% 2PT / 36.4% 3PT (18.2% of possessions)
2 dribbles = 25.0% eFG / 26.3% 2PT / 0 FGA from 3 (10.7% of possessions)
3-6 dribbles = 14.3% eFG / 14.3% 2PT / 0% from 3 (3.7% of possessions)
7+ dribbles = N/A (no recorded stats in isolation)
Delly:
0 dribbles = 67.8% eFG / 61.8% 2PT / 46.0% 3PT (38.6% of possessions)
1 dribble = 42.1% eFG / 38.7% 2PT / 30.8% 3PT (11% of possessions)
2 dribbles = 34.8% eFG / 39.4% 2PT / 15.4% 3PT (9.0% of possessions)
3-6 dribbles = 31.6% eFG / 33.7% 2PT / 13.3% 3PT (19.2% of possessions)
7+ dribbles (iso) = 45.6% eFG / 38.5% 2PT / 50.0% 3PT (22.1% of possessions)
So... what we see here is pretty clear.
Dunleavy is a catch and shoot specialist. If you force him to take more than 1 dribble, he will simply pass the ball; period, end of story. Can he "shoot over other defenders?" Maybe, but whenever he's in tight defense, or bodied up and forced to put the ball down; he's effectively useless.
Whereas Matthew Dellevadova is just as good in the catch and shoot, and gives up a bit on the first dribble; Delly can actually generate points in a variety of different ways. Here we see his ability to put the ball on the floor, for extended periods of time, scoring, generating assists, running an NBA offense, and without creating turnovers.
In isolation, which accounts for almost a quarter of Delly's attempts; he's scoring as efficiently as Dunleavy on the first bounce.
This is why your statement here is inaccurate; and just one of the many reasons Delly is more valuable than Mike Dunleavy.
Delly's outside shot has disappeared in the past 2 finals series and I attribute that to 2 things. One. the effort he exerts on defense killing his shot. Two, the increased intensity of finals defense simply neutralized Delly's ability to hit a shot. In this regard Dunleavy has a proven track record of not wilting in playoffs, to the contrary he comes up quite strong.
Not sure how you failed to mention Delly being hospitalized in 2014-15 or being injured in 15-16, but alright... I would grant that Dunleavy has been a better 3 point shooter, in the playoffs, when left wide open; which is generally the case for him, and not for Delly, since Delly is also running the point.
I see people saying Dunleavy can't defend, I can't say I agree there either. He's long and scrappy as hell. And he wouldn't get owned by Shaun Livingston the way Delly did in the finals, he has the length to neutralize Livingston and similar players.
Unless you've got some evidence to suggest Livingston would be bothered by Dunleavy, I'll just disagree with you there for a multitude of reasons that should be pretty obvious.
Also, are you going to honestly say that Dunleavy is as good a defender as Dellevedova? Because if not, then there's no point to discussing defense is there?
Delly's defense fell off big-time as we got deeper into the playoffs to the point where when push came to shove Lue benched him for lack of productivity on both ends of the court.
If you're talking about when Delly was injured, then he was on the bench because he was in pain.
Otherwise, we benched him because Irving was playing better all around. We benched him because LeBron James was playing the point when Irving wasn't and you needed one of the two on the floor at all times.
But even if you disagree with everything I just said, let's put all these arguments aside for a minute.
I do, but okay.
Griffin made this move. If I am choosing one talent evaluator over another I'll choose Griff over Gourikomo every time, all things considered.
Bro, you're argument is facile; you're claiming this was based on a talent evaluation? Give me a break. No one in their right mind would think Mike fucking Dunleavy is more talented or skilled or valuable than Delly. I don't think Griffin thinks that, and obivously Gourimoko doesn't think that.
Gilbert is not cheap. Lebron was apparently all in on this move. Lebron has apparently expressed his desire to have Dunleavy on the roster.
LeBron wanted Dunleavy last year, with Delly on the roster.... Dunleavy was a salary dump, he didn't cost Delly.
I believe that Griff, Gilbert, and Lebron had a certain value on Delly and it was well south of $9.5 million even in this market.
No shit.
This valuation was not just based on how much money they could save, it was based on how much they truly felt Delly was worth to the team, talent-wise, over the talent they could replace him for dollar for dollar.
So, Delly is worth less
substantially less than Austin Rivers?
The only advantage to Delly over Dunleavy is age.
Smh.... you could not be more wrong. Delly is the better defender, better passer, better creator, and yes, he's the better
shooter. I don't know where you're getting these ideas from..??
But $9.5 million over 4 years has an effect on our roster flexibility, and the cheaper shorter term deal for MD actually provides more flexibility down the road.
No... it does not. We'll be over the apron massively next off-season when James goes for the full-max. Our flexibility will be worse next season than it was this season in every conceivable way.
Griff, Gilbert and Lebron aren't worried about whether Delly can get better, they're all about right now, this year. If healthy Dunleavy gives us a better shot in the playoffs this year than what they have come to expect from Delly. Otherwise they would have matched Delly, and they wouldn't have JUMPED at the chance to bring in Dunleavy while still saving $$$.
You've pretty much stated that Griff would make the right decision period; which is an irrational basis for your argument.
And you can shit all over the TPE but the fact is it does give us some insurance and flexibility to make a move this winter if needed.
But I didn't "shit all over the TPE," I explained how it's used.. Does that
offend you? Does it offend you to know that the TPE cannot be traded to other teams?
WTF is going on here?
I mean, what did Dunleavy do, sleep with your sister?
What the fuck?
First off.. you're citing Griff and Gilbert like you have them on speed-dial. You're talking about Dunleavy stepping up defensively in the Finals against who? Doing what? While ignoring Delly's defense in the Finals last year.
And FWIW, you talk about people sleeping with sisters, while you need to get Drunkleavy's dick out of your mouth and his nuts off your chin bro... At least have the courtesy to wipe up after him, cuz he's dribbling all down the side of ya mouth.
You act like the guy is in a wheelchair but he's only a year older than Wade, and younger than RJ.
He's a year and a half older than Wade... He's also NOT D. Wade or comparable to any hall of fame player... Common sense.. And I don't think RJ is really the norm but an exception to it; I'd expect that to fall off sometime in the near future rather than the distant future.
This is a long post, so I'll chill out and wait to see your 5 page slice-and-dice rebuttal.
You got it...
tl;dr.
1) No Dunleavy is not better than Delly; please don't embarrass yourself trying to make such a claim.
2) We didn't trade Delly for Dunleavy; we allowed Delly to walk because we didn't want to match his salary; we then picked up Dunleavy in a salary dump and used the Delly S&T to facilitate Dunleavy. Both were financial moves, but not causually connected; i.e., we didn't know we were getting Dunleavy when we decided not to match Delly's offer sheet..
3) No, Dunleavy does not provide us with "more flexibility;" in fact, he offers us less flexibility. He's not as valuabe in any potential trade as Delly would be; nor does being closer to the salary cap yet invariably stuck over it provide greater flexibility. Any such argument that posits one less dollar of spending creates flexibility is purely naive.