If I had a slogan to pick, it would be arrogance.
A lot of social media "experts" try to one up each other's hot take about how bad they think Josh Allen is. When it comes out that the NFL is a lot higher on Allen than they are, what's the reaction? Is it to ask "are they seeing something that I'm missing?" Nope. It's "those stupid old dinosaurs are stuck in their football guyz ways that they haven't seen the truth in the numbers like I have."
Those same experts fall over each other to heap praise on Rosen. When it comes out that the NFL is a lot lower on Rosen than they are, what's the reaction? Is it to ask "are they seeing something that I'm missing?" Nope. It's "those stupid old dinosaurs can't handle the scary millennial and are afraid he might be too smart."
That shit is lazy, anti-intellectual, and arrogant. I have no issue with people who attempt to see both sides and end up on the opposite side of a debate from me. I actually like that because it helps me gain opposite perspective (for example, I can absolutely see why people prefer safer options to Allen). I have a big issue with people who just think that those that disagree with them are uninformed, less intelligent, outdated, etc.
And this draft cycle, it's been everywhere and worse than ever to the point where it's become unbearable. When people are looking up a guy's JUCO and fucking JV stats to try to keep their confirmation bias strong, it's gone too far.