Results 4,021 to 4,035 of 5705
Thread: Tristan Thompson
-
12-04-2012, 08:25 PM #4021Valuable Trading Chip
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Kent, OH
- Posts
- 1,897
- Thanks
- 1,484
- Thanked 1,687 Times in 687 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
A quick look at the other teams on the site tell me that it is not par for the course to get 20% of your shots blocked. I also don't understand why you're so hell bent on separating out the dunks/tips from the close shots.
By your logic, if a guy shot 38% from the field taking nothing but mid range jumpers, that'd be ok because that's about the league average for that spot.
Tristan gets blocked too much, so does Zeller, so does Samardo, they all need to improve because right now they're not good.
-
12-04-2012, 08:46 PM #4022
-
12-04-2012, 09:03 PM #4023Logjammin'
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Cleveland
- Posts
- 921
- Thanks
- 1,476
- Thanked 1,831 Times in 455 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
I've seen Tristan play a couple of times.
I've also seen other players play once or twice.
Tristan gets blocked far too easily and often.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to narbar32 For This Useful Post:
-
12-04-2012, 09:10 PM #4024Valuable Trading Chip
- Join Date
- Jan 2009
- Location
- Kent, OH
- Posts
- 1,897
- Thanks
- 1,484
- Thanked 1,687 Times in 687 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
You're not making a whole lot of sense right now, so I'm just gonna leave this be after I say this.
The "inside" shots include "tips", "dunks" and "close" shots
You were the one who kept referring back to their "close" shots
Nobody is saying Tristan isnt an awful finisher, but so are all of our other bigs except Andy.
-
12-05-2012, 12:15 AM #4025
Re: Tristan Thompson
There is something funny with 82games methodology. Tristan's overall percentage shots blocked is a whopping 20% vs Zeller total at 13%. Yet with inside shots they are close to the same despite Tristan having a worse percentage in each subcategory. This could be because Tristan tries to dunk more per their numbers but in addition, they state Tristan gets 20% of his jumpers block and that he shoots 37% of his shots as jumpers. That's odd right off the bat: I just don't see how a third of Tristan's shot could be considered jumpers and he gets 20% of those blocked?
The smell test for me and my impression of both, the overall percentage fits better with what I actually see happening in the game. Data mining with sub-analyses can get you into trouble often and I think this is one of those casesLast edited by Pioneer10; 12-05-2012 at 12:17 AM.
Michael LewisThere is a tension, peculiar to basketball, between the interests of the team and the interests of the individual. The game continually tempts the people who play it to do things that are not in the interest of the group.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Pioneer10 For This Useful Post:
-
12-05-2012, 11:12 AM #4026~
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 20,425
- Thanks
- 2,806
- Thanked 5,857 Times in 2,487 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
Thompson's shot distribution is consistent with last season. What's giving you grief perhaps is that 82games lacks granularity on what they consider a "jumper". Any shot 3 feet or more from the rim, they likely consider a jumper. Unfortunately hoopdata doesn't break down the %blocked statistic by area, and 82games doesn't break down jumpers by distance.
None of that changes the fact that as a team everyone but Andy is getting their inside shots blocked way too much.
-
12-05-2012, 01:06 PM #4027
Re: Tristan Thompson
Michael LewisThere is a tension, peculiar to basketball, between the interests of the team and the interests of the individual. The game continually tempts the people who play it to do things that are not in the interest of the group.
-
12-05-2012, 01:53 PM #4028Logjammin'
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Cleveland
- Posts
- 921
- Thanks
- 1,476
- Thanked 1,831 Times in 455 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
Nor does the fact that the rest of the shit on this roster gets blocked a lot change the fact that Tristan, the young and supposedly springy PF and recent top 5 pick, gets blocked the most and at an alarmingly high rate. Even arduous statistical contortions fail to diminish that reality, never mind what happens when you actually just watch him play.
It's obviously a problem for him. I fail to see what the references to the other players on this team adds to the discussion, particularly when so many of those other players would not be getting the minutes they're getting were they on good teams.
Pretty much every post discussing the effect (getting blocked/stripped too much) has identified at least some of the causes (too much time spent gathering before his jump, bringing the ball too low, poor ball control while it's in his hands generally, exact predictability in his timing and method of finishing, including never trying to dunk one handed, lack of real explosiveness around the basket, lack of strength, etc...). This is no mysterious phenomenon that would necessitate delving into deep statistical analysis.
Can he fix some of these things? I can't think of any player ever just willing himself into becoming a forceful and intimidating inside finisher... into becoming noticeably more explosive and powerful... so I'm not holding my breath for what I once hoped he would be when we drafted him. I've made this comparison before: Kevin Love and Blake Griffin posted extremely similar measurements and athletic testing results to each other, yet Griffin soars and finishes powerfully above the rim in grand fashion, while Love rarely looks like he can get both his feet off the floor at the same time and relies on his craftiness to finish inside. It would not be realistic to expect that, if he focused on it, Love could start finishing with the elevation and power of Griffin. Despite the very similar tests and measurements, they are just polar opposites athletically in how they are able to use their athleticism in basketball ways.
Point is, Tristan is no athletic freak on the court, regardless of what Sports Science might say. He's just a standard NBA PF athletically, really. And as much as I'd love for him to suddenly learn how to jump higher and faster with the ball in his possession and have the coordination and strength to power it into a dunk, I just don't ever see that happening. Rather, he's going to just need to stop thinking that's who he is and work on other ways to score with craftiness and finesse.
My overarching disappointment is that I don't want the Cavs to build around a crafty PF who finishes with finesse around the hoop, even if he does learn to do so, which is doubtful; I wanted an explosive brick shithouse in our front court finishing in opponents faces and tossing them a towel.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to narbar32 For This Useful Post:
-
12-05-2012, 02:07 PM #4029~
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 20,425
- Thanks
- 2,806
- Thanked 5,857 Times in 2,487 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
They don't have to be "jumpers", they can be hook shots, finger rolls, heaves at the rim ... anything from ~3ft out.
Heck, let's go back to the Pistons game and Tristan's 13 field goal attempts. ESPN tracks where the shots were taken:
http://espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=400277966
Here's a list of the "jumpers" that Tristan took from 3ft and beyond: 6ft, 5ft, 6ft, 4ft, 6ft.
So that's a total of 5 "jumpers" (only one of them actually went in, btw) which works out to be 38% of his shot attempts.
If you don't believe they recorded the distances correctly, then go back and watch the game tape. *shrugs*
None of this changes the fact that everybody but Andy is getting their shots swatted at a disgusting rate when they attempt shots near the rim.
-
12-05-2012, 02:14 PM #4030~
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 20,425
- Thanks
- 2,806
- Thanked 5,857 Times in 2,487 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
Clearly, it's a team problem.
As for Tristan, there's a lot for him to work on and he can certainly improve in all areas of the game. I think he'll look more explosive & athletic too once they get done tinkering with his weight.
That doesn't mean he will, but it would be dumb to write him off at this point.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Jon For This Useful Post:
-
12-05-2012, 02:22 PM #4031
Re: Tristan Thompson
Again, I don't find your argument compelling once again for exactly these reasons. Shots are from 4-6ft from the rim are damn close to the basket particularly when you have guys with 7 foot wingspans! The idea we have to exclude these shots from being considered "inside" shots to make Tristan's Thompson's block% look less atrocious compared to other Cavaliers is IMO silly. Other guys may not be Blake Griffin like finishers but this sort of data mining ("arduous statiscal contortions" as Narbar phrased it) doesn't change the fact that Tristan gets his shots blocked at high percentage then anybody else on the team and is a terrible finisher all around.
4 foot is the restricted area arc: so those "jumpers" which are not "inside" shots came within the paint and don't point out that by stretching/jumping where the ball left the person.

FYI: I do watch the games (NBA league pass broadband) and that is exactly why I'm shrugging at your posts. I'm also officially done with this argument: feel free to get in the last post as you like to do alwaysMichael LewisThere is a tension, peculiar to basketball, between the interests of the team and the interests of the individual. The game continually tempts the people who play it to do things that are not in the interest of the group.
-
12-05-2012, 02:34 PM #4032Team Player
- Join Date
- Jul 2008
- Posts
- 1,257
- Thanks
- 825
- Thanked 834 Times in 288 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
Sounds like a problem with decision-making and lack of interior passing rather than a problem with the shot/finish itself. Maybe the team just isn't that good at seeing an opportunity to cut to the basket without the ball for a dish, so guys are getting tunnel vision, going up, and getting blocked. Andy, on the other hand, knows how to move without the ball and so cuts for more uncontested/late contested buckets. So it's not as much an inability to finish as it is a mistaken attempt to finish when the defense isn't off balance.
-
12-05-2012, 02:49 PM #4033
-
12-05-2012, 03:02 PM #4034Logjammin'
- Join Date
- Sep 2008
- Location
- Cleveland
- Posts
- 921
- Thanks
- 1,476
- Thanked 1,831 Times in 455 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
About the team problem part, my point is that while it may be a problem common amongst the Cavs players, that has little bearing on whether it's a problem for Tristan. The offensive philosophy may have some effect, sure, but it's foolish to excuse Tristan's glaring tendency to get blocked based upon his teammates similar (though to lesser extents) deficiencies, especially given that his teammates are by and large not very good NBA players (aside from a couple).
Consider that marginal NBA players like CJ Miles or Casspi or Sloan may suck at shooting or finishing inside except for a hot streak here and there; that isn't comforting or a justifiable excuse for our most recent top 5 pick, Waiters, sucking at shooting or finishing inside. Like Tristan, I would like to be able to expect more out of him. For Dion, I'm still very hopeful, though. In regards to Tristan, I think I'm just dumb.
-
12-05-2012, 05:34 PM #4035~
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 20,425
- Thanks
- 2,806
- Thanked 5,857 Times in 2,487 Posts
Re: Tristan Thompson
It has a ton of bearing. In basketball, everything that goes on is always relative to the other 4 guys you're on the court with and the 5 guys trying to defend you.
And don't forget Kyrie is getting blocked at the rim a lot too.
Tristan may be the poster boy of the team for getting stuffed at the rim, but he also afforded the least space to work in.



Reply With Quote


