View Poll Results: To Tank or Not to Tank
- Voters
- 292. You may not vote on this poll
-
Yes, I want to secure a high draft pick and develop the young players.
209 71.58% -
No, go for the most wins and play the vets.
34 11.64% -
I'm still pissed that Disney bought Star Wars.
49 16.78%
Results 46 to 60 of 464
-
11-03-2012, 12:59 AM #46
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
If this year we're in the 5-8 pick range heading into the lottery, and the following year we're in the 12-14 range heading in the lottery, I wouldn't consider that a failure as long as the young guys looked to be progressing. At that point it would be time to re-sign KI and TT and unless we make a big move before then we should have enough to sign a marquee free agent heading into that offseason. At that point we would have KI, TT, TZ, DW, multiple 2013 first rounders, possibly multiple 2014 first rounders, and hopefully an all-star level FA. That's kind of the best plan we have right now unless Grant can pull of a deal to get someone here. So while I don't want to have a legitimate chance to get the #1 pick in 2014, being in the lottery wouldn't mean our team wasn't going places.
-
11-03-2012, 02:05 AM #47Count Duckula.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 1,207
- Thanks
- 507
- Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I say we roll one last tank out there and blow our way to the 2-4th or worst record than we have that shoot at the Number 1 pick. This tank will be the most important In history. A elite SF prospect Is this tanks target... At the same time the team better at least compete In games.
"You have to lose to win"
-
11-03-2012, 02:20 AM #48
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I'd be happy with an elite big this draft, since at the moment there appear to be 4-5 that are bound for the top 10. We really need a strong, athletic defender down low because Kyrie and Dion aren't quite up to snuff on that side of the ball and when Andy is gone, any semblance of good P&R defense we have is gone with him. I haven't seen Gobert or Austin play, but I think a center in the mold of Noel would work better for this team than one like Zeller.
-
11-03-2012, 02:43 AM #49All Star
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Mother Earth
- Posts
- 3,067
- Thanks
- 795
- Thanked 1,002 Times in 417 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
What I'm more concerned about now is this team's defense. Atrocious is an understatement.
When in doubt, step up the defense
-
11-03-2012, 03:20 AM #50Get Boobied'
- Join Date
- Oct 2006
- Location
- Mentor, Ohio
- Posts
- 4,959
- Thanks
- 721
- Thanked 568 Times in 239 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
Interesting..
Some people actually thought the Cavs were going to contend this year for anything.
I bet they thought the Browns would win the AFC North this year, too..

-
11-03-2012, 03:59 AM #51Count Duckula.
- Join Date
- Feb 2009
- Location
- Ohio
- Posts
- 1,207
- Thanks
- 507
- Thanked 187 Times in 121 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I can almost agree... sure the center could help big time. Even if we lose Andy we get a first round Pick. The question Is do you Draft C or SF first pick or Second. I would have to Agree go big If nothing Is there good at the wing. However At the same time We have nothing at all at the SF position however, The SF Is easier to trade for than big men. So pick your poison at this point.
"You have to lose to win"
-
11-03-2012, 06:24 AM #52
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
Yeah, this.
A lot of people were noting that "it's only 1 game, and their first loss" "it's only game 2" etc. But I'd say most people who want to "tank" aren't making that decision based on what happened against Chicago; they are making it because they realize how this team has such little talent, especially young talent.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Triumph36 For This Useful Post:
-
11-03-2012, 07:11 AM #53
-
11-03-2012, 07:43 AM #54Rising Star
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,750
- Thanks
- 19
- Thanked 404 Times in 190 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I hate it but I am going to look at Draft Express now and havent even bought league pass yet.
-
11-03-2012, 08:05 AM #55Rising Star
- Join Date
- Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,750
- Thanks
- 19
- Thanked 404 Times in 190 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
Does anyone really know if the Lakers pick is lottery protected or not?
-
11-03-2012, 08:38 AM #56Team Player
- Join Date
- Apr 2007
- Posts
- 1,220
- Thanks
- 67
- Thanked 301 Times in 106 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I agree with those saying we don't need to do anything to tank. The youthful talent and lack of talent elsewhere will mean we have a high pick again. If we can get another high pick, trade our expirings/Andy for asset(s) and hit on the Lakers pick, maybe we'll be in a position to add a good player in free agency and start to compete next season.
-
11-03-2012, 10:32 AM #57
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I didn't even bother reading the replies, I just wanted to come in here to say this thread sucks. Based on the timing of the OP this was made when we were getting destroyed by the Bulls. We are 2 games into the season, save the tanking talk for halfway into the season at least.
(This is coming from a strong supporter of tanking last year, and wouldn't mind doing it at all again this year. Let the team show us what they got first though.)
-
11-03-2012, 10:34 AM #58All Star
- Join Date
- Mar 2009
- Location
- Akron, OH
- Posts
- 3,959
- Thanks
- 3,143
- Thanked 3,039 Times in 995 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
With C.J. Miles being the main offseason acquisition, I think the Cavaliers' intent is pretty clear...
-
11-03-2012, 10:41 AM #59
-
11-03-2012, 10:45 AM #60Team Player
- Join Date
- Aug 2008
- Location
- Earth
- Posts
- 1,149
- Thanks
- 1,881
- Thanked 317 Times in 142 Posts
Re: To Tank or not to Tank, that is the question
I don't want to tank.
I want the team to battle and make progress.




Reply With Quote

