View Poll Results: What type of contender do you want to see in the future?
- Voters
- 39. You may not vote on this poll
-
I want a traditional 3 star championship team (maybe 1-2 more stars).
20 51.28% -
Let's make a team balanced so they can deal with everyone (above average players per position)!
10 25.64% -
I want a team that Kyrie can lead, get him some role players (1 star's enough)!
3 7.69% -
Let's move some of those "core" pieces! No draft picks! Get better players through trade!
2 5.13% -
Stock up the picks! We're going to have a great roster with guys who were selected in the top 5!
4 10.26%
Results 16 to 20 of 20
-
12-18-2012, 02:25 PM #16Rising Star
- Join Date
- Jun 2008
- Location
- TAMPA
- Posts
- 2,554
- Thanks
- 5,271
- Thanked 1,315 Times in 493 Posts
Re: Past, Present, and Future: Your Ideal Cavs Contender:
I would be thrilled with Len, but I am not sure he is the type of 2nd Banana people are looking for. My point is the draft wont bring us back to NBA title contention by itself. We are going to need to make 1-2 major moves in the next year and a half on top of the draft. There is no way around it!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to ajz20 For This Useful Post:
-
12-18-2012, 02:43 PM #17There go the Cavs!
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Location
- MidState
- Posts
- 3,602
- Thanks
- 388
- Thanked 690 Times in 326 Posts
Re: Past, Present, and Future: Your Ideal Cavs Contender:
We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit - Aristotle as quoted by Shaq..
-
12-18-2012, 03:46 PM #18Lord of ping pong balls
- Join Date
- Jul 2010
- Location
- Space
- Posts
- 2,993
- Thanks
- 4,170
- Thanked 2,568 Times in 979 Posts
Re: Past, Present, and Future: Your Ideal Cavs Contender:
How the hell will Noel be anything like Garnett? He has no offensive game whatsoever. End of story. If anyone is going to be the next Garnett, it'll be Anthony Davis. Noel wishes he was Anthony Davis.
This team functions best when everyone can shoot and run the floor well. Len can shoot very well for a big man. Noel can't shoot at all. Len is also even longer than Noel at 7'1" and a 7'5" wingspan. He also has the frame to defend the post whereas Noel will be questionable in that area. Len can also post up and he can shot block very well. We're in dire need of big men who can score. Len fits that mold much better than Noel, and Len is great on defense as well.
I don't think it's any question that Len fits infinitely better for this team than Noel.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Lottery God For This Useful Post:
-
12-18-2012, 03:50 PM #19Gold Star Member
- Join Date
- Apr 2005
- Posts
- 7,467
- Thanks
- 3,569
- Thanked 2,415 Times in 865 Posts
Re: Past, Present, and Future: Your Ideal Cavs Contender:
It's been proven you need stars to win championships in the NBA. In the last 33 years there's really been only 2 teams (Lenny Wilkens late 70's Seattle team and the Billups/Hamilton/Wallaces Pistons team) that won a title without what most would consider multiple star/superstar caliber players.
That is why the Cavs have to hit it big on these top draft picks they've been getting. That is the most likely and quite possibly only way they're going to be able to acquire that level of talent.
-
12-18-2012, 04:31 PM #20~
- Join Date
- May 2006
- Posts
- 20,425
- Thanks
- 2,806
- Thanked 5,857 Times in 2,487 Posts
Re: Past, Present, and Future: Your Ideal Cavs Contender:
Which of course means it's been disproven.

I think most would throw Dallas, Houston, and perhaps Washington in that group as well. The recent Celtics team is a dubious just because their superstar/star players were so far past their prime when they got together. Similarly I think the reputation of guys like Parker, Ginobili, Odom, Bynum, and Gasol are raised *because* their teams won championships.
Could the Spurs have won their championships with Billups and Hamilton rather than Parker and Ginobili? Perhaps.
If the Knicks or Nets ever actually win something - just watch and gape at who that media mecca immortalizes as a "superstar". Heck, it was funny listening to them argue that Felton should be an All Star for his performance this year and outright dismissing Kyrie because even though we're months away from the All Star game, in their opinion he hadn't played enough games. lol
There's no doubt the tank-a-holics on the board feel that we must draft multiple star players, but we wouldn't even have Irving if not for a trade where the only thing of substance we gave up was cap space.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Jon For This Useful Post:



Reply With Quote
