• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

The Capricious Non partisan Government Arbitrary Action thread.

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
I think most of my post already reference Trump as the Trump administration. as an example

"trump wants to poison our waters" would be inappropriate whereas " The Trump administration wants to poison our water" would be more non partisanship

Okay.

I see "they want to poison our waters" as starting down the same road of hyperbole that resulted in the other threads being closed, and I really have no desire to revisit that. So I'll just bow out of the thread.
 
Presidential Executive Order on The White House Initiative to Promote Excellence and Innovation at Historically Black Colleges and Universities
EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

WHITE HOUSE INITIATIVE TO PROMOTE EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION AT HISTORICALLY BLACK COLLEGES AND UNIVERSITIES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, and in order to advance opportunities in higher education, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. Historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) have made, and continue to make, extraordinary contributions to the general welfare and prosperity of our country. Established by visionary leaders, America's HBCUs have, for more than 150 years, produced many of our Nation's leaders in business, government, academia, and the military, and have helped create a black middle class. The Nation's more than 100 HBCUs are located in 20 States, the District of Columbia, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, and serve more than 300,000 undergraduate, graduate, and professional students. These institutions are important engines of economic growth and public service, and they are proven ladders of intergenerational advancement.

A White House Initiative on HBCUs would: advance America's full human potential; foster more and better opportunities in higher education; strengthen the capacity of HBCUs to provide the highest-quality education; provide equitable opportunities for HBCUs to participate in Federal programs; and increase the number of college-educated Americans who feel empowered and able to advance the common good at home and abroad.

Sec. 2. White House Initiative on HBCUs.

(a) Establishment. There is established the White House Initiative on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (Initiative), housed in the Executive Office of the President and led by an Executive Director designated by the President.

(b) Mission and Functions. The Initiative shall work with agencies, private-sector employers, educational associations, philanthropic organizations, and other partners to increase the capacity of HBCUs to provide the highest-quality education to an increasing number of students. The Initiative shall have two primary missions:

(i) increasing the private-sector role, including the role of private foundations, in:

(A) strengthening HBCUs through enhanced institutional planning and development, fiscal stability, and financial management; and

(B) upgrading institutional infrastructure, including the use of technology, to ensure the long-term viability of these institutions; and

(ii) enhancing HBCUs' capabilities to serve our Nation's young adults by:

(A) strengthening HBCUs' ability to equitably participate in Federal programs and exploring new ways of improving the relationship between the Federal Government and HBCUs;

(B) fostering private-sector initiatives and public-private partnerships while promoting specific areas and centers of academic research and program-based excellence throughout HBCUs;

(C) improving the availability, dissemination, and quality of information concerning HBCUs in the public policy sphere;

(D) sharing administrative and programmatic best practices within the HBCU community;

(E) partnering with elementary and secondary education stakeholders to build a "cradle-to-college" pipeline; and

(F) convening an annual White House Summit on HBCUs to address, among other topics, matters related to the Initiative's missions and functions.

(c) Federal Agency Plans.

(i) The Secretary of Education (Secretary), in consultation with the Executive Director, shall identify those agencies that regularly interact with HBCUs.

(ii) Each agency identified by the Secretary under subsection (c)(i) of this section shall prepare an annual plan (Agency Plan) describing its efforts to strengthen the capacity of HBCUs to participate in applicable Federal programs and initiatives. Where appropriate, each Agency Plan shall address, among other things, the agency's proposed efforts to:

(A) establish how the agency intends to increase the capacity of HBCUs to compete effectively for grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements;

(B) identify Federal programs and initiatives where HBCUs are not well represented, and improve HBCUs' participation in those programs and initiatives; and

(C) encourage public-sector, private-sector, and community involvement in improving the overall capacity of HBCUs.

(iii) The head of each agency identified in subsection (c)(i) of this section shall submit its Agency Plan to the Secretary and the Executive Director no later than 90 days after being so identified, and submit an updated Agency Plan annually thereafter.

(iv) To help fulfill the objectives of the Agency Plans, the head of each agency identified by the Secretary may provide, as appropriate, technical assistance and information to the Executive Director to enhance communication with HBCUs concerning the agency's program activities and the preparation of applications or proposals for grants, contracts, or cooperative agreements.

(v) Each agency identified by the Secretary shall appoint a senior official to report directly to the agency head on that agency's progress under this order, and to serve as liaison to the Initiative.

(d) Interagency Working Group. There is established an Interagency Working Group, which shall be chaired by the Executive Director and shall consist of one representative from each agency identified by the Secretary pursuant to subsection (c)(i) of this section, to help advance and coordinate the work required by this order.

Sec. 3. President's Board of Advisors on HBCUs.

(a) Establishment. There is established in the Department of Education the President's Board of Advisors on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (Board). The Board shall consist of not more than 25 members appointed by the President. The Board shall include the Secretary, the Executive Director, representatives of a variety of sectors -- such as philanthropy, education, business, finance, entrepreneurship, innovation, and private foundations -- and sitting HBCU presidents. The President shall designate one member of the Board to serve as its Chair, who shall help direct the Board's work in coordination with the Secretary and in consultation with the Executive Director. The Chair shall also consult with the Executive Director regarding the time and location of the Board's meetings, which shall take place at least once every 6 months.

(b) Mission and Functions. The Board shall advise the President, through the Initiative, on all matters pertaining to strengthening the educational capacity of HBCUs. In particular, the Board shall advise the President in the following areas:

(i) improving the identity, visibility, distinctive capabilities, and overall competitiveness of HBCUs;

(ii) engaging the philanthropic, business, government, military, homeland-security, and education communities in a national dialogue regarding new HBCU programs and initiatives;

(iii) improving the ability of HBCUs to remain fiscally secure institutions that can assist the Nation in achieving its educational goals and in advancing the interests of all Americans;

(iv) elevating the public awareness of, and fostering appreciation of, HBCUs; and

(v) encouraging public-private investments in HBCUs.

(c) Administration. The Department of Education shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board, consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the Board, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Chair, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.

(d) Report. The Board shall report annually to the President on the Board's progress in carrying out its duties under this section.

Sec. 4. Revocation of Executive Order. Executive Order 13532 of February 26, 2010 (Promoting Excellence, Innovation, and Sustainability at Historically Black Colleges and Universities), as amended, is revoked.

Sec. 5. General Provisions. (a) For the purposes of this order, "historically black colleges and universities" shall mean those institutions listed in 34 C.F.R. 608.2.

(b) This order shall apply to executive departments and agencies designated by the Secretary. Those departments and agencies shall provide timely reports and such information as is required to effectively carry out the objectives of this order.

(c) The heads of executive departments and agencies shall assist and provide information to the Board, consistent with applicable law, as may be necessary to carry out the functions of the Board. Each executive department and agency shall bear its own expenses of participating in the Initiative.

(d) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(e) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(f) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.



DONALD J. TRUMP



THE WHITE HOUSE,

# Order Replaced
Executive Order 13532 of February 26, 2010 (Promoting Excellence, Innovation, and Sustainability at Historically Black Colleges and Universities),
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-03-03/pdf/2010-4593.pdf
 
The main difference that I see, with a cursory glance ,between the new HCBU EO and the old that I see is in administration and funding that administration.
 
Okay.

I see "they want to poison our waters" as starting down the same road of hyperbole that resulted in the other threads being closed, and I really have no desire to revisit that. So I'll just bow out of the thread.
Which is fine because attempting to moderate it by proxy would end up with the same results

All I can do is try to highlight import points of the EO which is by definition administration policy and keep doing what I have been doing.

The point is if someone attempts to derail the thread and aren't discussing a specific policy, ruling or legislation as a majority we should just not respond to those post or give them credence.

Unless a mod is willing to move out post they consider off topic. there isn't much we can do but let it rot.

lets compare this to the Waterways definition. The thread Is the major flow of the waterway and the hyperbole or partisan bashing is unsegmented from the non partian waterway. Even though the post is contaminating the source. it is too much Maintenance to regulate or prevent that contamination. so the contamination must be endured.

Just like when a company dumps sludge in a dried out creek and it finds its way to flowing water and poisons existing waterway with no consequence because it was perfectly legal and the local area has limited legal resources to hold the responsible party liable.

fortunately in this scenario you have the option of using(posting) other waters (threads)so the impact would be minimal for you
 
The main difference that I see, with a cursory glance ,between the new HCBU EO and the old that I see is in administration and funding that administration.
@BooyaCS
I saw you disagree ? did you see other differences?
The old EO
(c) Administration. The Executive Director of the Initiative shall also serve as the Executive Director of the Board. The Department shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board to the extent permitted by law and within existing appropriations. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the Board, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Secretary, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-03-03/pdf/2010-4593.pdf

The New EO
(c) Administration. The Department of Education shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board, consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the Board, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Chair, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.


looks like I misread the new order. which is fine. however a post outlining this would of been more informative than a simple disagree.

so I am not seeing any major differences between the old EO and the new EO.
 
@BooyaCS
I saw you disagree ? did you see other differences?
The old EO
(c) Administration. The Executive Director of the Initiative shall also serve as the Executive Director of the Board. The Department shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board to the extent permitted by law and within existing appropriations. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the Board, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Secretary, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-03-03/pdf/2010-4593.pdf

The New EO
(c) Administration. The Department of Education shall provide funding and administrative support for the Board, consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations. Members of the Board shall serve without compensation, but shall be reimbursed for travel expenses, including per diem in lieu of subsistence, as authorized by law. Insofar as the Federal Advisory Committee Act, as amended (5 U.S.C. App.), may apply to the Board, any functions of the President under that Act, except for those of reporting to the Congress, shall be performed by the Chair, in accordance with guidelines issued by the Administrator of General Services.


looks like I misread the new order. which is fine. however a post outlining this would of been more informative than a simple disagree.

so I am not seeing any major differences between the old EO and the new EO.

I have no idea how I disagreed on that one. I was browsing through surprised a thread wasn't ummm gone the way of the others...
 
I have no idea how I disagreed on that one. I was browsing through surprised a thread wasn't ummm gone the way of the others...
well the anti partisan god must of intervened to ensure accuracy!
 
Here is a list of Bills and resolutions as of 03/02/2017. if you see a introduced bill or resolution you want to discuss be sure to include the resolution/bill number in your post.
You can find Senate comments on these resolutions here
https://www.congress.gov/congressional-record/2017/03/02/senate-section/article/S1579-1
Bills and resolutions for March 2nd 2017. ( Just click the resolution number and it will take you to the congressional.gov website where you can receive updates on the progress of bills that interest you.)
From the Congressional Record Online through the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
++ bolded are bills and Resolutions I find interest in.
Keep in mind these are bills in various stages. legislation pending Presidential approval will be updated on the OP as they occur
INTRODUCTION OF BILLS AND JOINT RESOLUTIONS

The following bills and joint resolutions were introduced, read the
first and second times by unanimous consent, and referred as indicated:

By Mr. PORTMAN (for himself, Mrs. Fischer, and Mr.
Burr):
S. 489. A bill to amend the Employee Retirement Income
Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
with respect to participant votes on the suspension of
benefits under multiemployer plans in critical and declining
status; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions.
By Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. Tester, and Mr. Risch):
S. 490. A bill to reinstate and extend the deadline for
commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project involving the Gibson Dam; to the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. Tester, Mr. Risch, and
Mr. Crapo):
S. 491. A bill to reinstate and extend the deadline for
commencement of construction of a hydroelectric project
involving Clark Canyon Dam; to the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources.
By Mr. CORNYN (for himself and Mr. Casey):
S. 492. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
to allow members of the Ready Reserve of a reserve component
of the Armed Forces to make elective deferrals on the basis
of their service to the Ready Reserve and on the basis of
their other employment; to the Committee on Finance.
By Mr. RUBIO:
S. 493. A bill to amend title 38, United States Code, to
provide for the removal or demotion of employees of the
Department of Veterans Affairs based on performance or
misconduct, and for other purposes; to the Committee on
Veterans' Affairs.

By Mr. GRASSLEY:
S. 494. A bill to improve transparency regarding the
activities of the American Red Cross; to the Committee on the
Judiciary.
By Mr. SANDERS:
S. 495. A bill to provide incentives for investment in
research and development for new medicines, to enhance access
to new medicines, and for other purposes; to the Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

By Ms. DUCKWORTH (for herself, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Young,
and Mrs. Capito):
S. 496. A bill to repeal the rule issued by the Federal
Highway Administration and the Federal Transit Administration
entitled ``Metropolitan Planning Organization Coordination
and Planning Area Reform''; to the Committee on Banking,
Housing, and Urban Affairs.
By Ms. CANTWELL (for herself, Mr. Grassley, Mr. Brown,
Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Coons, Mr. Franken, Mr. Tillis,
Mr. Merkley, Mrs. Ernst, Mr. Blunt, and Ms.
Klobuchar):
S. 497. A bill to amend title XVIII of the Social Security
Act to provide for Medicare coverage of certain lymphedema
compression treatment items as items of durable medical
equipment; to the Committee on Finance.
By Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. Peters):
S. 498. A bill to amend title 10, United States Code, to
require the Secretary of Defense to use only human-based
methods for training members of the Armed Forces in the
treatment of severe combat injuries, and for other purposes;
to the Committee on Armed Services.

By Mr. THUNE:
S. 499. A bill to amend the Food Security Act of 1985 to
address needs in the agriculture sector by establishing a
voluntary, short-term conserving use program for
participating farmers, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
By Mr. ROBERTS (for himself and Mrs. McCaskill):
S. 500. A bill to amend the Homeland Security Act of 2002
to make the Assistant Secretary of Homeland Security for
Health Affairs responsible for coordinating the efforts of
the Department of Homeland Security related to food,
agriculture, and veterinary defense against terrorism, and
for other purposes; to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.

By Mr. TESTER (for himself and Mr. Daines):
S. 501. A bill to amend the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act to
designate certain segments of East Rosebud Creek in Carbon
County, Montana, as components of the Wild and Scenic Rivers
System; to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. FRANKEN (for himself and Ms. Klobuchar):
S. 502. A bill to modify the boundary of Voyageurs National
Park in the State of Minnesota, and for other purposes; to
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. WYDEN (for himself, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Booker,
Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Blumenthal, and Mr. Peters):
S. 503. A bill to require the Secretary of Agriculture to
make publicly available certain regulatory records relating
to the administration of the Animal Welfare Act and the Horse
Protection Act, to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to
provide for the use of an alternative depreciation system for
taxpayers violating rules under the Animal Welfare Act and
the Horse Protection Act, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Finance.
By Ms. HIRONO (for herself and Mr. Daines):
S. 504. A bill to permanently authorize the Asia-Pacific
Economic Cooperation Business Travel Card Program; to the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
By Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. Bennet, and Mr.
Young):
S. 505. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
to provide for an energy equivalent of a gallon of diesel in
the case of liquefied natural gas for purposes of the Inland
Waterways Trust Fund financing rate; to the Committee on
Finance.
By Mr. THUNE:
S. 506. A bill to require that the Federal Government
procure from the private sector the goods and services
necessary for the operations and management of certain
Government agencies, and for other purposes; to the Committee
on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

By Mr. TESTER:
S. 507. A bill to sustain economic development and
recreational use of National Forest System land in the State
of Montana, to add certain land to the National Wilderness
Preservation System, to designate new areas for recreation,
and for other purposes; to the Committee on Energy and
Natural Resources.
By Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. Merkley):
S. 508. A bill to provide for the conveyance of certain
Federal land in the State of Oregon, and for other purposes;
to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. Enzi, Ms. Murkowski,
and Mr. Risch):
S. 509. A bill to improve the control and management of
invasive species that threaten and harm Federal land under
the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Agriculture and the
Secretary of the Interior, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. BLUMENTHAL (for himself, Ms. Baldwin, Mr.
Markey, Mr. Wyden, Mr. Brown, Mr. Whitehouse, Ms.
Hirono, Mr. Coons, Ms. Warren, Mr. Schatz, Mrs.
Feinstein, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Van
Hollen, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Kaine, Mr. Bennet, Mr.
Tester, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Hassan, Mrs. McCaskill, Ms.
Klobuchar, Mr. Franken, Ms. Duckworth, Mrs. Shaheen,
Mrs. Murray, Mr. Booker, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Murphy, Mr.
Peters, Mr. Udall, Ms. Harris, Mr. Heinrich, Ms.
Cantwell, Mr. Schumer, Ms. Cortez Masto, Mr. King,
Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Menendez, Mr. Leahy, and Mr.
Warner):
S. 510. A bill to protect a woman's right and ability to
determine whether and when to bear a child or end a pregnancy
by limiting restrictions on the provision of abortion
services; to the Committee on the Judiciary.
By Mr. MANCHIN:
S. 511. A bill to provide for the sealing of records
relating to Federal nonviolent criminal offenses related to
substance use disorders, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. BARRASSO (for himself, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr.
Inhofe, Mr. Booker, Mr. Crapo, Mrs. Fischer, Mrs.
Capito, and Mr. Manchin):
S. 512. A bill to modernize the regulation of nuclear
energy; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
By Mr. WYDEN (for himself and Mr. Merkley):
S. 513. A bill to designate the Frank and Jeanne Moore Wild
Steelhead Special Management Area in the State of Oregon; to
the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. PERDUE (for himself and Mr. Peters):
S. 514. A bill to direct the Secretary of Veterans Affairs
to carry out a pilot program to provide access to magnetic
EEG/EKG-guided resonance therapy to veterans; to the
Committee on Veterans' Affairs.
By Mr. CASEY (for himself, Mr. Brown, and Mrs.
McCaskill):
S. 515. A bill to require the Secretary of Labor to
maintain a publicly available list of all employers that
relocate a call center overseas, to make such companies
ineligible for Federal grants or guaranteed loans, and to
require disclosure of the physical location of business
agents engaging in customer service communications, and for
other purposes; to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and
Transportation.

By Mr. WARNER (for himself and Mr. Gardner):
S. 516. A bill to provide grants to assist States in
developing and implementing plans to address cybersecurity
threats or vulnerabilities, and for other purposes; to the
Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
By Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. Donnelly, Mr.
Grassley, Mr. Blunt, Mrs. McCaskill, Mrs. Ernst, Ms.
Heitkamp, Mr. Hoeven, Mr. Sasse, Ms. Baldwin, Mr.
Thune, Mr. Roberts, Ms. Klobuchar, and Mr. Durbin):
S. 517. A bill to amend the Clean Air Act with respect to
the ethanol waiver for Reid vapor pressure limitations under
such Act; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
By Mr. WICKER (for himself, Ms. Heitkamp, Mr. Boozman,
Mr. Barrasso, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Franken, Ms. Hirono, Ms.
Klobuchar, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Risch, Mr. Schatz, and
Mr. Tester):
S. 518. A bill to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act to provide for technical assistance for small treatment
works; to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
By Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. Schumer):
S. 519. A bill to amend the Safe Water Drinking Act to
require the Administrator of the Environmental Protection
Agency to establish maximum contaminant levels for
certain contaminants, and for other purposes; to the

Committee on Environment and Public Works.
By Mr. CASSIDY:
S. 520. A bill to amend title XIX of the Social Security
Act to reform payment to States under the Medicaid program;
to the Committee on Finance.

By Mr. TESTER (for himself, Mr. Risch, Mrs. Murray, and
Mrs. McCaskill):
S. 521. A bill to make the National Parks and Federal
Recreational Lands Pass available at a discount to veterans;
to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
By Mr. TESTER:
S. 522. A bill to establish a 5-year ban on individuals
appointed to Executive Schedule positions and Members of
Congress engaging in lobbying activities at the Federal
level; to the Committee on the Judiciary.

By Mr. MANCHIN (for himself, Ms. Klobuchar, Ms.
Heitkamp, Mr. Nelson, Mr. King, Mr. Murphy, Ms.
Baldwin, Ms. Warren, Ms. Hassan, and Mrs. Shaheen):
S. 523. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
to establish a stewardship fee on the production and
importation of opioid pain relievers, and for other purposes;
to the Committee on Finance.
By Mr. BOOZMAN (for himself, Mr. Brown, Mr. Cochran,
Mr. Cotton, Mr. Isakson, and Mr. Wicker):
S. 524. A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986
to make permanent certain provisions of the Heartland,
Habitat, Harvest, and Horticulture Act of 2008 relating to
timber; to the Committee on Finance.
By Mrs. GILLIBRAND (for herself and Mr. Schumer):
S. 525. A bill to require the United States Postal Service
to designate a single, unique ZIP code for particular
communities; to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.

By Mrs. FISCHER (for herself, Mr. Coons, Mr. Scott, and
Mrs. Gillibrand):
S. 526. A bill to amend the Small Business Act to provide
for expanded participation in the microloan program, and for
other purposes; to the Committee on Small Business and
Entrepreneurship.
By Mr. BLUNT:
S. 527. A bill to improve access to emergency medical
services, and for other purposes; to the Committee on Health,
Education, Labor, and Pensions.
By Mr. SASSE (for himself, Mr. Alexander, Mr. Cassidy,
Mr. Grassley, Mr. Heller, Mr. Lee, Mr. McConnell, Mr.
Perdue, Mr. Roberts, and Mr. Inhofe):
S.J. Res. 26. A joint resolution providing for
congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United
States Code, of the rule submitted by the Department of
Education relating to teacher preparation issues; to the
Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
By Mr. CASSIDY (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Isakson,
and Mr. Daines):
S.J. Res. 27. A joint resolution disapproving the rule
submitted by the Department of Labor relating to
``Clarification of Employer's Continuing Obligation to Make
and Maintain an Accurate Record of Each Recordable Injury and
Illness''; to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and
Pensions.
By Mr. INHOFE (for himself, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Barrasso,
Mr. Johnson, Mr. Moran, and Mrs. Fischer):
S.J. Res. 28. A joint resolution providing for
congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United
States Code, of the rule submitted by the Administrator of
the Environmental Protection Agency relating to accidental
release prevention requirements of risk management programs
under the Clean Air Act; to the Committee on Environment and
Public Works.

By Mr. DAINES (for himself, Mr. Hatch, Mr. Kennedy, and
Mr. Barrasso):
S.J. Res. 29. A joint resolution providing for
congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United
States Code, of the final rule of the Office of Natural
Resources Revenue of the Department of the Interior relating
to consolidated Federal oil and gas and Federal and Indian
coal valuation reform; to the Committee on Energy and Natural
Resources.

By Mr. PERDUE (for himself, Mr. Boozman, and Mr.
Leahy):
S.J. Res. 30. A joint resolution providing for the
reappointment of Steve Case as a citizen regent of the Board
of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution; to the Committee
on Rules and Administration.
By Mr. YOUNG:
S.J. Res. 31. A joint resolution to authorize the use of
United States Armed Forces against al-Qaeda, the Taliban, the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, successor organizations, and
associated forces; to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
 
Last edited:
SUBMISSION OF CONCURRENT AND SENATE RESOLUTIONS

The following concurrent resolutions and Senate resolutions were
read, and referred (or acted upon), as indicated:

By Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself and Mr. Graham):
S. Res. 78. A resolution expressing the sense of the Senate
recognizing 3 years of Russian military aggression in
Ukraine; to the Committee on Foreign Relations.
By Ms. COLLINS (for herself, Mr. Reed, Mr. Blumenthal,
Mr. Carper, Mr. Cochran, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Markey, Mr.
Tillis, and Mrs. Capito):
S. Res. 79. A resolution designating March 2, 2017, as
``Read Across America Day''; considered and agreed to.
By Mr. COONS (for himself and Mr. Inhofe):
S. Res. 80. A resolution designating March 3, 2017, as
``World Wildlife Day''; considered and agreed to.
By Mr. ROBERTS (for himself, Ms. Stabenow, Mr. Crapo,
Mr. Cardin, and Ms. Klobuchar):
S. Con. Res. 7. A concurrent resolution expressing the
sense of Congress that tax-exempt fraternal benefit societies
have historically provided and continue to provide critical
benefits to the people and communities of the United States;
to the Committee on Finance.
By Mr. CARDIN (for himself, Mr. Leahy, Mrs. McCaskill,
Ms. Warren, Mr. Carper, Mrs. Feinstein, Mrs. Murray,
Mr. Wyden, Mr. Durbin, Mr. Reed, Ms. Stabenow, Mr.
Brown, Mr. Casey, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Whitehouse, Mr.
Udall, Mr. Merkley, Mr. Bennet, Mrs. Gillibrand, Mr.
Franken, Mr. Coons, Mr. Blumenthal, Ms. Baldwin, Mr.
Murphy, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Markey, Mr.
Booker, Mr. Peters, Mr. Van Hollen, Ms. Harris, Ms.
Cortez Masto, and Ms. Duckworth):
S. Con. Res. 8. A concurrent resolution clarifying any
potential misunderstanding as to whether actions taken by
President Donald J. Trump constitute a violation of the
Emoluments Clause, and calling on President Trump to divest
his interest in, and sever his relationship to, the Trump
Organization; to the Committee on Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs.
 
The wire-tapping conspiracy is making me miss the free press thread.:chuckle:

Politics gets people riled up. For a while I thought Ben was overreacting with the warnings and locks, but sometimes things go too far. So maybe it's best to keep everything in this boring text-wall thread.
 
Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

PROTECTING THE NATION FROM FOREIGN TERRORIST ENTRY INTO THE UNITED STATES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. 1101 et seq., and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and to protect the Nation from terrorist activities by foreign nationals admitted to the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy and Purpose. (a) It is the policy of the United States to protect its citizens from terrorist attacks, including those committed by foreign nationals. The screening and vetting protocols and procedures associated with the visa-issuance process and the United States Refugee Admissions Program (USRAP) play a crucial role in detecting foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism and in preventing those individuals from entering the United States. It is therefore the policy of the United States to improve the screening and vetting protocols and procedures associated with the visa-issuance process and the USRAP.

(b) On January 27, 2017, to implement this policy, I issued Executive Order 13769 (Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States).

(i) Among other actions, Executive Order 13769 suspended for 90 days the entry of certain aliens from seven countries: Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen. These are countries that had already been identified as presenting heightened concerns about terrorism and travel to the United States. Specifically, the suspension applied to countries referred to in, or designated under, section 217(a)(12) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12), in which Congress restricted use of the Visa Waiver Program for nationals of, and aliens recently present in, (A) Iraq or Syria, (B) any country designated by the Secretary of State as a state sponsor of terrorism (currently Iran, Syria, and Sudan), and (C) any other country designated as a country of concern by the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence. In 2016, the Secretary of Homeland Security designated Libya, Somalia, and Yemen as additional countries of concern for travel purposes, based on consideration of three statutory factors related to terrorism and national security: "(I) whether the presence of an alien in the country or area increases the likelihood that the alien is a credible threat to the national security of the United States; (II) whether a foreign terrorist organization has a significant presence in the country or area; and (III) whether the country or area is a safe haven for terrorists." 8 U.S.C. 1187(a)(12)(D)(ii). Additionally, Members of Congress have expressed concerns about screening and vetting procedures following recent terrorist attacks in this country and in Europe.

(ii) In ordering the temporary suspension of entry described in subsection (b)(i) of this section, I exercised my authority under Article II of the Constitution and under section 212(f) of the INA, which provides in relevant part: "Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate." 8 U.S.C. 1182(f). Under these authorities, I determined that, for a brief period of 90 days, while existing screening and vetting procedures were under review, the entry into the United States of certain aliens from the seven identified countries -- each afflicted by terrorism in a manner that compromised the ability of the United States to rely on normal decision-making procedures about travel to the United States -- would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.

(iii) Executive Order 13769 also suspended the USRAP for 120 days. Terrorist groups have sought to infiltrate several nations through refugee programs. Accordingly, I temporarily suspended the USRAP pending a review of our procedures for screening and vetting refugees. Nonetheless, I permitted the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security to jointly grant case-by-case waivers when they determined that it was in the national interest to do so.

(iv) Executive Order 13769 did not provide a basis for discriminating for or against members of any particular religion. While that order allowed for prioritization of refugee claims from members of persecuted religious minority groups, that priority applied to refugees from every nation, including those in which Islam is a minority religion, and it applied to minority sects within a religion. That order was not motivated by animus toward any religion, but was instead intended to protect the ability of religious minorities -- whoever they are and wherever they reside -- to avail themselves of the USRAP in light of their particular challenges and circumstances.

(c) The implementation of Executive Order 13769 has been delayed by litigation. Most significantly, enforcement of critical provisions of that order has been temporarily halted by court orders that apply nationwide and extend even to foreign nationals with no prior or substantial connection to the United States. On February 9, 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit declined to stay or narrow one such order pending the outcome of further judicial proceedings, while noting that the "political branches are far better equipped to make appropriate distinctions" about who should be covered by a suspension of entry or of refugee admissions.

(d) Nationals from the countries previously identified under section 217(a)(12) of the INA warrant additional scrutiny in connection with our immigration policies because the conditions in these countries present heightened threats. Each of these countries is a state sponsor of terrorism, has been significantly compromised by terrorist organizations, or contains active conflict zones. Any of these circumstances diminishes the foreign government's willingness or ability to share or validate important information about individuals seeking to travel to the United States. Moreover, the significant presence in each of these countries of terrorist organizations, their members, and others exposed to those organizations increases the chance that conditions will be exploited to enable terrorist operatives or sympathizers to travel to the United States. Finally, once foreign nationals from these countries are admitted to the United States, it is often difficult to remove them, because many of these countries typically delay issuing, or refuse to issue, travel documents.

(e) The following are brief descriptions, taken in part from the Department of State's Country Reports on Terrorism 2015 (June 2016), of some of the conditions in six of the previously designated countries that demonstrate why their nationals continue to present heightened risks to the security of the United States:

(i) Iran. Iran has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1984 and continues to support various terrorist groups, including Hizballah, Hamas, and terrorist groups in Iraq. Iran has also been linked to support for al-Qa'ida and has permitted al-Qa'ida to transport funds and fighters through Iran to Syria and South Asia. Iran does not cooperate with the United States in counterterrorism efforts.

(ii) Libya. Libya is an active combat zone, with hostilities between the internationally recognized government and its rivals. In many parts of the country, security and law enforcement functions are provided by armed militias rather than state institutions. Violent extremist groups, including the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), have exploited these conditions to expand their presence in the country. The Libyan government provides some cooperation with the United States' counterterrorism efforts, but it is unable to secure thousands of miles of its land and maritime borders, enabling the illicit flow of weapons, migrants, and foreign terrorist fighters. The United States Embassy in Libya suspended its operations in 2014.

(iii) Somalia. Portions of Somalia have been terrorist safe havens. Al-Shabaab, an al-Qa'ida-affiliated terrorist group, has operated in the country for years and continues to plan and mount operations within Somalia and in neighboring countries. Somalia has porous borders, and most countries do not recognize Somali identity documents. The Somali government cooperates with the United States in some counterterrorism operations but does not have the capacity to sustain military pressure on or to investigate suspected terrorists.

(iv) Sudan. Sudan has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1993 because of its support for international terrorist groups, including Hizballah and Hamas. Historically, Sudan provided safe havens for al-Qa'ida and other terrorist groups to meet and train. Although Sudan's support to al-Qa'ida has ceased and it provides some cooperation with the United States' counterterrorism efforts, elements of core al-Qa'ida and ISIS-linked terrorist groups remain active in the country.

(v) Syria. Syria has been designated as a state sponsor of terrorism since 1979. The Syrian government is engaged in an ongoing military conflict against ISIS and others for control of portions of the country. At the same time, Syria continues to support other terrorist groups. It has allowed or encouraged extremists to pass through its territory to enter Iraq. ISIS continues to attract foreign fighters to Syria and to use its base in Syria to plot or encourage attacks around the globe, including in the United States. The United States Embassy in Syria suspended its operations in 2012. Syria does not cooperate with the United States' counterterrorism efforts.

(vi) Yemen. Yemen is the site of an ongoing conflict between the incumbent government and the Houthi-led opposition. Both ISIS and a second group, al-Qa'ida in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP), have exploited this conflict to expand their presence in Yemen and to carry out hundreds of attacks. Weapons and other materials smuggled across Yemen's porous borders are used to finance AQAP and other terrorist activities. In 2015, the United States Embassy in Yemen suspended its operations, and embassy staff were relocated out of the country. Yemen has been supportive of, but has not been able to cooperate fully with, the United States in counterterrorism efforts.

(f) In light of the conditions in these six countries, until the assessment of current screening and vetting procedures required by section 2 of this order is completed, the risk of erroneously permitting entry of a national of one of these countries who intends to commit terrorist acts or otherwise harm the national security of the United States is unacceptably high. Accordingly, while that assessment is ongoing, I am imposing a temporary pause on the entry of nationals from Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen, subject to categorical exceptions and case-by-case waivers, as described in section 3 of this order.

(g) Iraq presents a special case. Portions of Iraq remain active combat zones. Since 2014, ISIS has had dominant influence over significant territory in northern and central Iraq. Although that influence has been significantly reduced due to the efforts and sacrifices of the Iraqi government and armed forces, working along with a United States-led coalition, the ongoing conflict has impacted the Iraqi government's capacity to secure its borders and to identify fraudulent travel documents. Nevertheless, the close cooperative relationship between the United States and the democratically elected Iraqi government, the strong United States diplomatic presence in Iraq, the significant presence of United States forces in Iraq, and Iraq's commitment to combat ISIS justify different treatment for Iraq. In particular, those Iraqi government forces that have fought to regain more than half of the territory previously dominated by ISIS have shown steadfast determination and earned enduring respect as they battle an armed group that is the common enemy of Iraq and the United States. In addition, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, the Iraqi government has expressly undertaken steps to enhance travel documentation, information sharing, and the return of Iraqi nationals subject to final orders of removal. Decisions about issuance of visas or granting admission to Iraqi nationals should be subjected to additional scrutiny to determine if applicants have connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations, or otherwise pose a risk to either national security or public safety.

(h) Recent history shows that some of those who have entered the United States through our immigration system have proved to be threats to our national security. Since 2001, hundreds of persons born abroad have been convicted of terrorism-related crimes in the United States. They have included not just persons who came here legally on visas but also individuals who first entered the country as refugees. For example, in January 2013, two Iraqi nationals admitted to the United States as refugees in 2009 were sentenced to 40 years and to life in prison, respectively, for multiple terrorism-related offenses. And in October 2014, a native of Somalia who had been brought to the United States as a child refugee and later became a naturalized United States citizen was sentenced to 30 years in prison for attempting to use a weapon of mass destruction as part of a plot to detonate a bomb at a crowded Christmas-tree-lighting ceremony in Portland, Oregon. The Attorney General has reported to me that more than 300 persons who entered the United States as refugees are currently the subjects of counterterrorism investigations by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

(i) Given the foregoing, the entry into the United States of foreign nationals who may commit, aid, or support acts of terrorism remains a matter of grave concern. In light of the Ninth Circuit's observation that the political branches are better suited to determine the appropriate scope of any suspensions than are the courts, and in order to avoid spending additional time pursuing litigation, I am revoking Executive Order 13769 and replacing it with this order, which expressly excludes from the suspensions categories of aliens that have prompted judicial concerns and which clarifies or refines the approach to certain other issues or categories of affected aliens.

Sec. 2. Temporary Suspension of Entry for Nationals of Countries of Particular Concern During Review Period. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall conduct a worldwide review to identify whether, and if so what, additional information will be needed from each foreign country to adjudicate an application by a national of that country for a visa, admission, or other benefit under the INA (adjudications) in order to determine that the individual is not a security or public-safety threat. The Secretary of Homeland Security may conclude that certain information is needed from particular countries even if it is not needed from every country.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President a report on the results of the worldwide review described in subsection (a) of this section, including the Secretary of Homeland Security's determination of the information needed from each country for adjudications and a list of countries that do not provide adequate information, within 20 days of the effective date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall provide a copy of the report to the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence.

(c) To temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies during the review period described in subsection (a) of this section, to ensure the proper review and maximum utilization of available resources for the screening and vetting of foreign nationals, to ensure that adequate standards are established to prevent infiltration by foreign terrorists, and in light of the national security concerns referenced in section 1 of this order, I hereby proclaim, pursuant to sections 212(f) and 215(a) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(f) and 1185(a), that the unrestricted entry into the United States of nationals of Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen would be detrimental to the interests of the United States. I therefore direct that the entry into the United States of nationals of those six countries be suspended for 90 days from the effective date of this order, subject to the limitations, waivers, and exceptions set forth in sections 3 and 12 of this order.

(d) Upon submission of the report described in subsection (b) of this section regarding the information needed from each country for adjudications, the Secretary of State shall request that all foreign governments that do not supply such information regarding their nationals begin providing it within 50 days of notification.

(e) After the period described in subsection (d) of this section expires, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, shall submit to the President a list of countries recommended for inclusion in a Presidential proclamation that would prohibit the entry of appropriate categories of foreign nationals of countries that have not provided the information requested until they do so or until the Secretary of Homeland Security certifies that the country has an adequate plan to do so, or has adequately shared information through other means. The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, or the Secretary of Homeland Security may also submit to the President the names of additional countries for which any of them recommends other lawful restrictions or limitations deemed necessary for the security or welfare of the United States.

(f) At any point after the submission of the list described in subsection (e) of this section, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, may submit to the President the names of any additional countries recommended for similar treatment, as well as the names of any countries that they recommend should be removed from the scope of a proclamation described in subsection (e) of this section.

(g) The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President a joint report on the progress in implementing this order within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 90 days of the effective date of this order, a third report within 120 days of the effective date of this order, and a fourth report within 150 days of the effective date of this order.
 
Last edited:
How many people (including Tornicade) actually read these walls of text?
O/U - 0.5

@The Oi @Maximus
 
Sec. 3. Scope and Implementation of Suspension.
(a) Scope. Subject to the exceptions set forth in subsection (b) of this section and any waiver under subsection (c) of this section, the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order shall apply only to foreign nationals of the designated countries who:

(i) are outside the United States on the effective date of this order;

(ii) did not have a valid visa at 5:00 p.m., eastern standard time on January 27, 2017; and

(iii) do not have a valid visa on the effective date of this order.

(b) Exceptions. The suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order shall not apply to:

(i) any lawful permanent resident of the United States;

(ii) any foreign national who is admitted to or paroled into the United States on or after the effective date of this order;

(iii) any foreign national who has a document other than a visa, valid on the effective date of this order or issued on any date thereafter, that permits him or her to travel to the United States and seek entry or admission, such as an advance parole document;

(iv) any dual national of a country designated under section 2 of this order when the individual is traveling on a passport issued by a non-designated country;

(v) any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; or

(vi) any foreign national who has been granted asylum; any refugee who has already been admitted to the United States; or any individual who has been granted withholding of removal, advance parole, or protection under the Convention Against Torture.

(c) Waivers. Notwithstanding the suspension of entry pursuant to section 2 of this order, a consular officer, or, as appropriate, the Commissioner, U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), or the Commissioner's delegee, may, in the consular officer's or the CBP official's discretion, decide on a case-by-case basis to authorize the issuance of a visa to, or to permit the entry of, a foreign national for whom entry is otherwise suspended if the foreign national has demonstrated to the officer's satisfaction that denying entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship, and that his or her entry would not pose a threat to national security and would be in the national interest. Unless otherwise specified by the Secretary of Homeland Security, any waiver issued by a consular officer as part of the visa issuance process will be effective both for the issuance of a visa and any subsequent entry on that visa, but will leave all other requirements for admission or entry unchanged. Case-by-case waivers could be appropriate in circumstances such as the following:

(i) the foreign national has previously been admitted to the United States for a continuous period of work, study, or other long-term activity, is outside the United States on the effective date of this order, seeks to reenter the United States to resume that activity, and the denial of reentry during the suspension period would impair that activity;

(ii) the foreign national has previously established significant contacts with the United States but is outside the United States on the effective date of this order for work, study, or other lawful activity;

(iii) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States for significant business or professional obligations and the denial of entry during the suspension period would impair those obligations;

(iv) the foreign national seeks to enter the United States to visit or reside with a close family member (e.g., a spouse, child, or parent) who is a United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or alien lawfully admitted on a valid nonimmigrant visa, and the denial of entry during the suspension period would cause undue hardship;

(v)the foreign national is an infant, a young child or adoptee, an individual needing urgent medical care, or someone whose entry is otherwise justified by the special circumstances of the case;

(vi) the foreign national has been employed by, or on behalf of, the United States Government (or is an eligible dependent of such an employee) and the employee can document that he or she has provided faithful and valuable service to the United States Government;

(vii) the foreign national is traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA), 22 U.S.C. 288 et seq., traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government, or traveling to conduct business on behalf of an international organization not designated under the IOIA;

(viii) the foreign national is a landed Canadian immigrant who applies for a visa at a location within Canada; or

(ix) the foreign national is traveling as a United States Government-sponsored exchange visitor.

Sec. 4. Additional Inquiries Related to Nationals of Iraq. An application by any Iraqi national for a visa, admission, or other immigration benefit should be subjected to thorough review, including, as appropriate, consultation with a designee of the Secretary of Defense and use of the additional information that has been obtained in the context of the close U.S.-Iraqi security partnership, since Executive Order 13769 was issued, concerning individuals suspected of ties to ISIS or other terrorist organizations and individuals coming from territories controlled or formerly controlled by ISIS. Such review shall include consideration of whether the applicant has connections with ISIS or other terrorist organizations or with territory that is or has been under the dominant influence of ISIS, as well as any other information bearing on whether the applicant may be a threat to commit acts of terrorism or otherwise threaten the national security or public safety of the United States.

Sec. 5. Implementing Uniform Screening and Vetting Standards for All Immigration Programs. (a) The Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence shall implement a program, as part of the process for adjudications, to identify individuals who seek to enter the United States on a fraudulent basis, who support terrorism, violent extremism, acts of violence toward any group or class of people within the United States, or who present a risk of causing harm subsequent to their entry. This program shall include the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures, such as in-person interviews; a database of identity documents proffered by applicants to ensure that duplicate documents are not used by multiple applicants; amended application forms that include questions aimed at identifying fraudulent answers and malicious intent; a mechanism to ensure that applicants are who they claim to be; a mechanism to assess whether applicants may commit, aid, or support any kind of violent, criminal, or terrorist acts after entering the United States; and any other appropriate means for ensuring the proper collection of all information necessary for a rigorous evaluation of all grounds of inadmissibility or grounds for the denial of other immigration benefits.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security, in conjunction with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the Director of National Intelligence, shall submit to the President an initial report on the progress of the program described in subsection (a) of this section within 60 days of the effective date of this order, a second report within 100 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report within 200 days of the effective date of this order.

Sec. 6. Realignment of the U.S. Refugee Admissions Program for Fiscal Year 2017. (a) The Secretary of State shall suspend travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall suspend decisions on applications for refugee status, for 120 days after the effective date of this order, subject to waivers pursuant to subsection (c) of this section. During the 120-day period, the Secretary of State, in conjunction with the Secretary of Homeland Security and in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, shall review the USRAP application and adjudication processes to determine what additional procedures should be used to ensure that individuals seeking admission as refugees do not pose a threat to the security and welfare of the United States, and shall implement such additional procedures. The suspension described in this subsection shall not apply to refugee applicants who, before the effective date of this order, have been formally scheduled for transit by the Department of State. The Secretary of State shall resume travel of refugees into the United States under the USRAP 120 days after the effective date of this order, and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall resume making decisions on applications for refugee status only for stateless persons and nationals of countries for which the Secretary of State, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence have jointly determined that the additional procedures implemented pursuant to this subsection are adequate to ensure the security and welfare of the United States.

(b) Pursuant to section 212(f) of the INA, I hereby proclaim that the entry of more than 50,000 refugees in fiscal year 2017 would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and thus suspend any entries in excess of that number until such time as I determine that additional entries would be in the national interest.

(c) Notwithstanding the temporary suspension imposed pursuant to subsection (a) of this section, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security may jointly determine to admit individuals to the United States as refugees on a case-by-case basis, in their discretion, but only so long as they determine that the entry of such individuals as refugees is in the national interest and does not pose a threat to the security or welfare of the United States, including in circumstances such as the following: the individual's entry would enable the United States to conform its conduct to a preexisting international agreement or arrangement, or the denial of entry would cause undue hardship.

(d) It is the policy of the executive branch that, to the extent permitted by law and as practicable, State and local jurisdictions be granted a role in the process of determining the placement or settlement in their jurisdictions of aliens eligible to be admitted to the United States as refugees. To that end, the Secretary of State shall examine existing law to determine the extent to which, consistent with applicable law, State and local jurisdictions may have greater involvement in the process of determining the placement or resettlement of refugees in their jurisdictions, and shall devise a proposal to lawfully promote such involvement.

Sec. 7. Rescission of Exercise of Authority Relating to the Terrorism Grounds of Inadmissibility. The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall, in consultation with the Attorney General, consider rescinding the exercises of authority permitted by section 212(d)(3)(B) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1182(d)(3)(B), relating to the terrorism grounds of inadmissibility, as well as any related implementing directives or guidance.

Sec. 8. Expedited Completion of the Biometric Entry-Exit Tracking System. (a) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall expedite the completion and implementation of a biometric entry exit tracking system for in-scope travelers to the United States, as recommended by the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit to the President periodic reports on the progress of the directive set forth in subsection (a) of this section. The initial report shall be submitted within 100 days of the effective date of this order, a second report shall be submitted within 200 days of the effective date of this order, and a third report shall be submitted within 365 days of the effective date of this order. The Secretary of Homeland Security shall submit further reports every 180 days thereafter until the system is fully deployed and operational.

Sec. 9. Visa Interview Security. (a) The Secretary of State shall immediately suspend the Visa Interview Waiver Program and ensure compliance with section 222 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1202, which requires that all individuals seeking a nonimmigrant visa undergo an in-person interview, subject to specific statutory exceptions. This suspension shall not apply to any foreign national traveling on a diplomatic or diplomatic-type visa, North Atlantic Treaty Organization visa, C-2 visa for travel to the United Nations, or G-1, G-2, G-3, or G-4 visa; traveling for purposes related to an international organization designated under the IOIA; or traveling for purposes of conducting meetings or business with the United States Government.

(b) To the extent permitted by law and subject to the availability of appropriations, the Secretary of State shall immediately expand the Consular Fellows Program, including by substantially increasing the number of Fellows, lengthening or making permanent the period of service, and making language training at the Foreign Service Institute available to Fellows for assignment to posts outside of their area of core linguistic ability, to ensure that nonimmigrant visa-interview wait times are not unduly affected.

Sec. 10. Visa Validity Reciprocity. The Secretary of State shall review all nonimmigrant visa reciprocity agreements and arrangements to ensure that they are, with respect to each visa classification, truly reciprocal insofar as practicable with respect to validity period and fees, as required by sections 221(c) and 281 of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1201(c) and 1351, and other treatment. If another country does not treat United States nationals seeking nonimmigrant visas in a truly reciprocal manner, the Secretary of State shall adjust the visa validity period, fee schedule, or other treatment to match the treatment of United States nationals by that foreign country, to the extent practicable.

Sec. 11. Transparency and Data Collection. (a) To be more transparent with the American people and to implement more effectively policies and practices that serve the national interest, the Secretary of Homeland Security, in consultation with the Attorney General, shall, consistent with applicable law and national security, collect and make publicly available the following information:

(i) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been charged with terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; convicted of terrorism-related offenses while in the United States; or removed from the United States based on terrorism-related activity, affiliation with or provision of material support to a terrorism-related organization, or any other national-security-related reasons;

(ii) information regarding the number of foreign nationals in the United States who have been radicalized after entry into the United States and who have engaged in terrorism-related acts, or who have provided material support to terrorism-related organizations in countries that pose a threat to the United States;

(iii) information regarding the number and types of acts of gender-based violence against women, including so-called "honor killings," in the United States by foreign nationals; and

(iv) any other information relevant to public safety and security as determined by the Secretary of Homeland Security or the Attorney General, including information on the immigration status of foreign nationals charged with major offenses.

(b) The Secretary of Homeland Security shall release the initial report under subsection (a) of this section within 180 days of the effective date of this order and shall include information for the period from September 11, 2001, until the date of the initial report. Subsequent reports shall be issued every 180 days thereafter and reflect the period since the previous report.

Sec. 12. Enforcement. (a) The Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall consult with appropriate domestic and international partners, including countries and organizations, to ensure efficient, effective, and appropriate implementation of the actions directed in this order.

(b) In implementing this order, the Secretary of State and the Secretary of Homeland Security shall comply with all applicable laws and regulations, including, as appropriate, those providing an opportunity for individuals to claim a fear of persecution or torture, such as the credible fear determination for aliens covered by section 235(b)(1)(A) of the INA, 8 U.S.C. 1225(b)(1)(A).

(c) No immigrant or nonimmigrant visa issued before the effective date of this order shall be revoked pursuant to this order.

(d) Any individual whose visa was marked revoked or marked canceled as a result of Executive Order 13769 shall be entitled to a travel document confirming that the individual is permitted to travel to the United States and seek entry. Any prior cancellation or revocation of a visa that was solely pursuant to Executive Order 13769 shall not be the basis of inadmissibility for any future determination about entry or admissibility.

(e) This order shall not apply to an individual who has been granted asylum, to a refugee who has already been admitted to the United States, or to an individual granted withholding of removal or protection under the Convention Against Torture. Nothing in this order shall be construed to limit the ability of an individual to seek asylum, withholding of removal, or protection under the Convention Against Torture, consistent with the laws of the United States.

Sec. 13. Revocation. Executive Order 13769 of January 27, 2017, is revoked as of the effective date of this order.

Sec. 14. Effective Date. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., eastern daylight time on March 16, 2017.

Sec. 15. Severability. (a) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.

(b) If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid because of the lack of certain procedural requirements, the relevant executive branch officials shall implement those procedural requirements.

Sec. 16. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
March 6, 2017.
 
Last edited:

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top