If it's highly front-loaded/signing bonus money, we'll never miss any of that money at all.No denying how steep that is but the cash is simply there and it’s opportunistic.
We just mashing disagree’s on every post now for the fuck of it? @AZ_
Is it now? Because it's the same employer that's hing a new FO.No, I thought your post was (per usual) shit.
Because it's rather worthless to put the poor drafts of any regime onto this one, much less a position specific critique by position.
lol Browns never draft good WRs lol
No, I thought your post was (per usual) shit.
Because it's rather worthless to put the poor drafts of any regime onto this one, much less a position specific critique by position.
lol Browns never draft good WRs lol
His overall point was right though. Pretending like you can get Jarvis Landry production out of a day 3 WR is asinine, and yes the about 10 picks we've fucking wasted on day 3 WRs the last couple years are a proper example of that, particularly when some of that regime is still here.No, I thought your post was (per usual) shit.
Because it's rather worthless to put the poor drafts of any regime onto this one, much less a position specific critique by position.
lol Browns never draft good WRs lol
His overall point was right though. Pretending like you can get Jarvis Landry production out of a day 3 WR is asinine, and yes the about 10 picks we've fucking wasted on day 3 WRs the last couple years are a proper example of that, particularly when some of that regime is still here.
The chances of a day 3 WR being good are about the same as flipping a coin and having it land on heads 10 times in a row.
His overall point was right though. Pretending like you can get Jarvis Landry production out of a day 3 WR is asinine, and yes the about 10 picks we've fucking wasted on day 3 WRs the last couple years are a proper example of that, particularly when some of that regime is still here.
The chances of a day 3 WR being good are about the same as flipping a coin and having it land on heads 10 times in a row.
But now what?
It doesn't mean you don't continue evaluating and drafting them.
It's not much different from people who say they shouldn't draft a RB from Penn State because of Curtis Enis.
Well, now we don't need to waste multiple picks on WRs in false hope of one becoming good in order to have an NFL caliber WR group.But now what?
It doesn't mean you don't continue evaluating and drafting them.
It's not much different from people who say they shouldn't draft a RB from Penn State because of Curtis Enis.