• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Rate the last movie you saw

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
I think that's kind of what I'm talking about in my first post though. Black Panther was a highly emotional film for me, and many (most) of my Black friends. But my non-Black friends didn't see it that way. Like, at all.

Yeah, but I guess my counter would be...was it emotional because of the actual content in the film or because it was cool to see a giant blockbuster superhero movie with a majority black cast?

Because it sounds like Black Panther is the latter. Spider-Verse is definitely the former. It's just great storytelling.
 
Yeah, but I guess my counter would be...was it emotional because of the actual content in the film or because it was cool to see a giant blockbuster superhero movie with a majority black cast?

Because it sounds like Black Panther is the latter.

Oh, I know where you're coming from - it's where a lot people who have seen the film are likely going to come from; for aforementioned reasons. But to answer your question, it actually had nothing to do with it being a Black cast. That's actually demonstrably true on the whole, as in, if you look at Black movies in general you can see how/why Black Panther stands out.

For example, most "Black" movies that come out do not do as particularly well, even within the Black community. Sure, it's a profitable industry, but Black-oriented films aren't a new phenomena; in fact, even Black superhero films aren't anything new.

For instance, the first successful Marvel movie was actually Blade. This was a film that is nothing at all like Black Panther even though Wesley Snipes was a huge deal at the time and the first two movies were financial successes for the studio.

That being said, a lot of people, including myself, walked into Black Panther expecting yet-another exploitative movie (think, poorly implemented pandering if not outright stereotyping throughout a mediocre action movie). I was extremely skeptical and for that reason I was actually incredibly disinterested in seeing the film, yet my non-Black friends all wanted to see it - so I was dragged along.

So to be clear, there are many movies that come out every year with nearly all-Black casts. I think I see roughly zero of them, year after year, and have relatively no interest. Most Black people, AFAIK, would probably be in the same camp. An "all-Black" cast is more sloganeering than it is actual marketing appeal (most Black viewers really don't give a rats ass if the cast is "all" Black; in fact, an "all" Black cast might even be utterly ridiculous given the context - and yes, this happens in a lot of movies that I would define as 'exploitative').

So, tl;dr, it definitely had nothing to do with the cast being Black - Black films are a dime a dozen - but rather it was the story being Black, if that makes sense.
 
I haven't seen Into the Spider-Verse, but on you guys' recommendation, I'll definitely check it out.

But just wanted to point out that I think BP was nominated not because it had Black characters - there are a lot of movies, every year, that do feature Black actors; but instead, because it was so well put together, and became a cultural phenomena, and because it was truly a good movie.

In saying that though, I've come to realize there is a disconnect between what Black people think about Black Panther, and non-Black people. And there's nothing wrong with that.. I experience cultural disconnects every fucking day being married to a foreigner. But to give you an idea, I saw the movie with friends as well as my wife; and my Asian friends thought it was great but ... they didn't really get it (oddly, my Mexican friends did). My wife, who is Asian, didn't really get it either, but she thought it was still great.

But Black men and women in the audience do understand the symbolism and the narrative, and the subtle challenges and push-backs in the film because Ryan Coogler spent no time explaining Black culture through exposition but instead just immersing the film within it.

Now understandably, this isn't a majority Black country, and the Academy isn't a majority Black institution; so, there's reason to believe that most of the Academy members, like most audience members, won't see the film in the same light as African-American audiences.

Many will think that it's a cultural phenomena, and there's tremendous buzz, but that the art itself is lacking compared to other films that have been nominated. I think that's understandable, and that's why I think so many are pushing the film right now because the narrative, scope, and messaging in the movie is actually fundamentally Black, that it's very easy to miss. For many, it might be analogous to watching a Japanese movie that's immersed in Japanese culture, not meant for export, and then trying to really understand it (an exercise that I've frequently done in the past, and it's not intuitive).

And BP is actually a lot like this - it's actually quite a bit like a foreign film in that, the symbolism and cultural undertones that are weaved throughout the movie are so uncommon on the big screen that they might seem alien - and simply tolerated as being a far out vision of a comic book. In that process, the subtlety of what Coogler is doing is likely lost, because what's happening on the screen is minimized in the process. The gravity of the personal experience he's presenting, yes through the lens of a superhero, isn't as well understood or appreciated by non-Black audiences, and again, simply due to not living that experience and already being in that culture. And admittedly, part of that lack of understanding is a failure on the director for not conveying it in a way that it could be understood - however, I think Coogler deliberately avoided too much exposition as a statement to make the counterfactual normative claim that 'this should require no explanation.'

Now, all this being said, do I think BP is the greatest film of all time? No. It's probably not in my Top 10 or even Top 20 films. I'm not sure if it's even close. So I want to say that to establish some ground truth here - the film is often overrated by many, but also underrated by some as well.

But compared to it's contemporaries, the current nominees for Best Picture - I can't see how or why BP would lose?

Bohemian Rhapsody is among the worst movies nominated; but it's nomination was assured since it's a biographical portrayal and these films historically do the best at the Oscars. The same goes for Vice, and The Favourite.

BlacKKKlansman, and A Star is Born are obviously both high-reviewed and well liked films, but I wasn't a fan of ASB even though I did think the movie was very well put together. I find myself having a hard time actually agreeing that these movies were better than Black Panther; or even some of the nominees from last year including The Shape of Water, Lady Bird, Dunkirk or Get Out.

Now, obviously much of this is subjective, and I haven't really delved into what I think makes BP such an awesome film (I've done that a few times already in this thread); but, I just wanted to establish the framework with which I'm operating in 2019 and why I would say BP should win Best Picture (and yes, I think it absolutely should).

IMO, if BP were not to win, given how beloved it is, how well received it was, how well made it was, and how powerful that movie is to those who it was intended for (which is not automatic, again, look at the numerous films with Black actors in them); then I think that would probably illustrate just how wide the gulf is between the Academy and African-American culture. And again, that isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it'd be an interesting observation nonetheless.

I obviously couldn't watch Black Panther from the same perspective you did. I thought it was a great movie, but thought Avengers: Infinity War was better.

I not really a fan of nominating so many movies nobody watched over the movies everyone watches. Sure, some blockbusters aren't the best, but many times they are dismissed even though they are very good and very well made. Just because it's a comic book movie, or a sci fi movie, doesn't mean there can't be a great underlying story.
 
I loved Black Panther, saw it twice in the theater, but this is going to Roma. The acting, storytelling, and camera work are really hard to top... and it's a directing marvel. Would be absolutely stunned if it lost.

We started to watch that, turned it off after a few minutes because of subtitles, it was hard to read the dialog and watch the action at the same time. Maybe we were just tired that night, being night owls, we often watch movies well after midnight.
 
Oh, I know where you're coming from - it's where a lot people who have seen the film are likely going to come from; for aforementioned reasons. But to answer your question, it actually had nothing to do with it being a Black cast. That's actually demonstrably true on the whole, as in, if you look at Black movies in general you can see how/why Black Panther stands out.

For example, most "Black" movies that come out do not do as particularly well, even within the Black community. Sure, it's a profitable industry, but Black-oriented films aren't a new phenomena; in fact, even Black superhero films aren't anything new.

For instance, the first successful Marvel movie was actually Blade. This was a film that is nothing at all like Black Panther even though Wesley Snipes was a huge deal at the time and the first two movies were financial successes for the studio.

That being said, a lot of people, including myself, walked into Black Panther expecting yet-another exploitative movie (think, poorly implemented pandering if not outright stereotyping throughout a mediocre action movie). I was extremely skeptical and for that reason I was actually incredibly disinterested in seeing the film, yet my non-Black friends all wanted to see it - so I was dragged along.

So to be clear, there are many movies that come out every year with nearly all-Black casts. I think I see roughly zero of them, year after year, and have relatively no interest. Most Black people, AFAIK, would probably be in the same camp. An "all-Black" cast is more sloganeering than it is actual marketing appeal (most Black viewers really don't give a rats ass if the cast is "all" Black; in fact, an "all" Black cast might even be utterly ridiculous given the context - and yes, this happens in a lot of movies that I would define as 'exploitative').

So, tl;dr, it definitely had nothing to do with the cast being Black - Black films are a dime a dozen - but rather it was the story being Black, if that makes sense.

Haven't watched/didn't want to watch a bunch of the nominees so I can't give my opinion about the nominees, but I thought BP was boring in certain objective ways. I was disappointed with the overall plot structure- after the first Mbaku duel and introducing Killmonger, I thought to myself "here's how it's gonna go. Killmonger is a relative of T'Chala, probably a son of the guy they killed in the first scene, he wins a duel vs T'Chala but foolishly doesn't kill him by throwing him off the cliff or something, he becomes King while T'Chala comes back to redeem himself, possibly with the help of Mbaku." This isn't hindsight at all, I thought that as I was watching so I wasn't really affected/surprised by anything that came later.

I was also really disappointed by the fight scenes. When Coogler filmed Creed, I thought he made the most impressive fights I've ever seen in a boxing movie. That one take sequence he had where Creed is getting ready in the locker room all the way to the KO perfectly captured the feeling of nervous anticipation to sudden violence that a boxing match presents. But BP was more of the same from marvel movies imo, awkward cuts and a bit incoherent at times. I'm still waiting for some director to just say "Screw it, I'm going to film these fights like The Raid films," and I was hoping Coogler would be the one to do that.

Sounds like I'm negative on the film, but overall I liked it and I'd rate it as an above average marvel film.
 
Haven't watched/didn't want to watch a bunch of the nominees so I can't give my opinion about the nominees, but I thought BP was boring in certain objective ways. I was disappointed with the overall plot structure- after the first Mbaku duel and introducing Killmonger, I thought to myself "here's how it's gonna go. Killmonger is a relative of T'Chala, probably a son of the guy they killed in the first scene, he wins a duel vs T'Chala but foolishly doesn't kill him by throwing him off the cliff or something, he becomes King while T'Chala comes back to redeem himself, possibly with the help of Mbaku." This isn't hindsight at all, I thought that as I was watching so I wasn't really affected/surprised by anything that came later.

I was also really disappointed by the fight scenes. When Coogler filmed Creed, I thought he made the most impressive fights I've ever seen in a boxing movie. That one take sequence he had where Creed is getting ready in the locker room all the way to the KO perfectly captured the feeling of nervous anticipation to sudden violence that a boxing match presents. But BP was more of the same from marvel movies imo, awkward cuts and a bit incoherent at times. I'm still waiting for some director to just say "Screw it, I'm going to film these fights like The Raid films," and I was hoping Coogler would be the one to do that.

Sounds like I'm negative on the film, but overall I liked it and I'd rate it as an above average marvel film.

Black Panther is basically just Lion King, only Mufasa comes back for his own revenge instead of Mufasa's son.
 
Haven't watched/didn't want to watch a bunch of the nominees so I can't give my opinion about the nominees, but I thought BP was boring in certain objective ways. I was disappointed with the overall plot structure- after the first Mbaku duel and introducing Killmonger, I thought to myself "here's how it's gonna go. Killmonger is a relative of T'Chala, probably a son of the guy they killed in the first scene, he wins a duel vs T'Chala but foolishly doesn't kill him by throwing him off the cliff or something, he becomes King while T'Chala comes back to redeem himself, possibly with the help of Mbaku." This isn't hindsight at all, I thought that as I was watching so I wasn't really affected/surprised by anything that came later.

A couple of points I would make is that, for one, I don't think the plot is ever really a surprise in, well, any Marvel film. Avengers: Infinity War -- everyone should have known what was going to happen, and many of us knew before walking into the theater because we read the Infinity Gems series.

Secondly, any character biopic is going to be predictable if you know the material, so I don't think this is a case where knowing how the movie is going to go in anyway detracts from how it gets there.

Third, much of what you describe was foreshadowed. The reason you saw N'Jobu killed was because Coogler is clearly foreshadowing the importance of this event. When Killmonger reveals he is Wakandan, which happens exceptionally early on in the movie, it's pretty clear what's happened - so keep in mind, this isn't something you're not supposed to know.

The challenge M'Baku makes clearly sets up Killmonger to similarly challenge T'Chala; and Coogler goes out of his way to foreshadow this, again pretty early on.

This is all setup, within the first 30 minutes of the movie.

Lastly, we can reduce the plots of many great movies down into the ridiculous; here's the (edited) plot synopsis someone wrote for Rocky on IMDb:

"Rocky Balboa is a small-time boxer who lives in an apartment in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, and his career has so far not gotten off the canvas. Rocky earns a living by collecting debts for a loan shark named Gazzo, but Gazzo doesn't think Rocky has the viciousness it takes to beat up deadbeats. Rocky still boxes every once in a while to keep his boxing skills sharp, and his ex-trainer, Mickey, believes he could've made it to the top if he was willing to work for it. Rocky, goes to a pet store that sells pet supplies, and this is where he meets a young woman named Adrian, who is extremely shy, with no ability to talk to men. Rocky befriends her. ...Adrian explains that she has never been in a man's apartment before. Rocky sets her mind at ease, and they become lovers. Current world heavyweight boxing champion Apollo Creed comes up with the idea of giving an unknown a shot at the title. Apollo checks out the Philadelphia boxing scene, and chooses Rocky. Fight promoter Jergens gets things in gear, and Rocky starts training with Mickey. After a lot of training, Rocky is ready for the match, and he wants to prove that he can go the distance with Apollo."

Pretty cut and dry; and frankly, the plot of Rocky is pretty cut and dry; as is BP. I don't think either movie is necessarily an example of a thrilling plot insomuch as they're examples of great dramatic narratives played out on the screen - even if you do know where the movie is ultimately going.

I was also really disappointed by the fight scenes. When Coogler filmed Creed, I thought he made the most impressive fights I've ever seen in a boxing movie. That one take sequence he had where Creed is getting ready in the locker room all the way to the KO perfectly captured the feeling of nervous anticipation to sudden violence that a boxing match presents. But BP was more of the same from marvel movies imo, awkward cuts and a bit incoherent at times. I'm still waiting for some director to just say "Screw it, I'm going to film these fights like The Raid films," and I was hoping Coogler would be the one to do that.

I actually don't think about the action scenes all that much; although I did apparently like them more than you did. Although I would agree that the final action sequence with Killmonger wasn't done very well.

FWIW, I view BP more as a drama piece with action scenes, rather than than an action movie with dramatic notes sprinkled in...

Sounds like I'm negative on the film, but overall I liked it and I'd rate it as an above average marvel film.

On the Marvel scale I have it ranked at the top with Infinity War and Winter Soldier. It's personally my favorite Marvel film, and this is coming from someone that, again, had no interest in seeing the movie when it first came out and isn't even a fan of the character in the comics that much -- although I did collect them since, I collected most Marvel releases in my youth.
 
We started to watch that, turned it off after a few minutes because of subtitles, it was hard to read the dialog and watch the action at the same time. Maybe we were just tired that night, being night owls, we often watch movies well after midnight.

That sounds to me like you just didn't feel like reading subtitles or especially opening credits, because there's literally no action happening at all in the first bit of the movie (unless you count Cleo washing the driveway or using the bathroom, ha). The movie keeps being panned as "slow", and I can't think of a lazier critique for Roma (not saying you did that).
 
That sounds to me like you just didn't feel like reading subtitles or especially opening credits, because there's literally no action happening at all in the first bit of the movie (unless you count Cleo washing the driveway or using the bathroom, ha). The movie keeps being panned as "slow", and I can't think of a lazier critique for Roma (not saying you did that).

action is whatever is going on at the time, not specifically action. Can't watch the person's face and read the words at the same time.
 
I just finished watching Dances with Wolves for the whatever time.

I don't know if there is a movie with a better musical score than DWW. Others up there for me off the top of my head are Braveheart, Last of the Mohicans, and Born on the Fourth of July.
 
High Flying Bird is a really good film. It's just a lot of very talented people working together, with Soderbergh directing, McRaney (writer of moonlight) writing, and Andre Holland starring. It feels almost like one of the Sorkin workplace dramas, with lots of snappy dialogue and a lot of hidden meanings in what the characters say.

Just don't go into it expecting a basketball movie. This is all backroom deals, and although the NBA is the backdrop of the film, it's much more about worker compensation and even touches on the history of black athlete labor.
 
Took our kid to Lego Movie 2. Really well done and really funny. He enjoyed it but my wife and I were laughing our asses off.

He’s a pretty perceptive kid for 4 but I’d say a lot of the jokes, like with many kids movies these days, play better with teens and up. Definitely adult friendly. There were Sheryl Swoopes and Gary Payton legos for example among many other gen- x to late millenial friendly references.

It has done TERRIBLY in the box office. Not exactly sure why either. Maybe it wasn’t hyped enough.
 
action is whatever is going on at the time, not specifically action. Can't watch the person's face and read the words at the same time.

I mean, I think the best show on TV right now is the Italian show Gomorrah and the subtitles have never once impeded my enjoyment of the show. I'd much rather read the lines myself than listen to godawful dubbing where the words clearly don't match up with the mouth movement, which is a huge pet peeve of mine when watching media.
 
Yeah, but I guess my counter would be...was it emotional because of the actual content in the film or because it was cool to see a giant blockbuster superhero movie with a majority black cast?

Because it sounds like Black Panther is the latter. Spider-Verse is definitely the former. It's just great storytelling.

Any film with John Mulaney in it is worth an Oscar.
 
Bumblebee 9/10.

Hearing Soundwave say "Ravage, eject!" gave me the chills.

It is the Transformers movie we deserved.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top