Cleveland Browns 2019 Season

Amherstcavsfan · Apr 23, 2019

Draft Network has a create your own Big Board. This is just a reactionary thing I built, I will probably refine it between now and Thursday.

https://thedraftnetwork.com/bigboard/GzuFEoZGG9

FLAME AWAY

Out of the Rafters at the Q · Apr 23, 2019

Ohio said:
I wonder if he could be part of a package to move up into the 1st round.

Devin Bush, anyone?

A Schobert trade probably isn't moving us into the first round.

If you're trading Schobert because you don't value Linebackers, why would you waste that first rounder on another linebacker?

red. · Apr 23, 2019

FrontPageNews · Apr 23, 2019

Dorsey can find Lbs in the mid rounds. Not going to lose sleep over joe sho. Probably better to trade him now than pay him 10M per or close to that.

Ohio · Apr 23, 2019

Out of the Rafters at the Q said:
A Schobert trade probably isn't moving us into the first round.

If you're trading Schobert because you don't value Linebackers, why would you waste that first rounder on another linebacker?

Fair point.

FiveThous · Apr 23, 2019

Ohio said:
I mean, good players get traded all the time in the NFL out of necessity. It happens. Shit, Frank Clark just got traded today.

Well yeah, nobody is saying to give Joe away for nothing. You don't trade him now unless the value makes sense.

I wonder if he could be part of a package to move up into the 1st round.

Devin Bush, anyone?

Also, lets say your scenario plays out. We let Joe walk to get a compensatory pick. When will we know for sure what round that pick will land in? Not very familiar with the overall compensatory process.

Compensatory picks are always the following year of FA.

This is a great resource: https://overthecap.com/the-basics-and-methodology-of-projecting-the-nfls-compensatory-draft-picks/

Juice is Loose · Apr 23, 2019

Patriots make a living off the compensatory picks.

FiveThous · Apr 23, 2019

Juice Is Loose said:
Patriots make a living off the compensatory picks.

Ravens did too with Ozzie at the helm.

Triplethreat · Apr 23, 2019

View: https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status/1120880791108476928?s=21

Wouldn’t hate

MirORich · Apr 23, 2019

Triplethreat said:
View: https://twitter.com/adamschefter/status/1120880791108476928?s=21

Wouldn’t hate

Wants a lot of money, is 30, and is coming off an injury.

The draft picks compensation for him would have to be really low to even consider for the Browns imo and even the dent into the cap(affecting next years rollover and total cap space) might just be too much for a player of his age and contract expectations.

Triplethreat · Apr 23, 2019

MirORich said:
Wants a lot of money, is 30, and is coming off an injury.

The draft picks compensation for him would have to be really low to even consider for the Browns imo and even the dent into the cap(affecting next years rollover and total cap space) might just be too much for a player of his age and contract expectations.

Still wouldn’t hate.

When healthy he is a top 3 slot CB. No qualms with taking a shot in him and that’s a vast defensive improvement immediately.

The Human Q-Tip · Apr 24, 2019

Ohio said:
Woah. I could see it though. Even though LB isn't a strength right now. Schobert is good but he's not elite, and he's likely gonna want elite money.

Not to mention LBs are almost as replaceable as RBs.

Certain guys will be cap casualties and he could be one.

It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Dorsey has made some clear "win now" moves, and likely believes we should be aiming for a significant playoff run. So why would you ditch your best linebacker now because he might become too expensive in the future? Especially given that LB is one of the weakest positions on the team. We went 0-3 in the three games he missed, and gave up 26, 33, and 37 points in those games. His absence was most noticeable against KC, where we were just killed in the underneath passing game.

CBBI · Apr 24, 2019

The Human Q-Tip said:
It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Here's a visual explanation.

Ohio · Apr 24, 2019

The Human Q-Tip said:
It doesn't make sense to me at all.

Dorsey has made some clear "win now" moves, and likely believes we should be aiming for a significant playoff run. So why would you ditch your best linebacker now because he might become too expensive in the future? Especially given that LB is one of the weakest positions on the team. We went 0-3 in the three games he missed, and gave up 26, 33, and 37 points in those games. His absence was most noticeable against KC, where we were just killed in the underneath passing game.

This is his last year under contract. Some people are worried about Dorsey putting us in “cap hell” ... giving Schobert a ton of money would be a great way to do it.

The Human Q-Tip · Apr 24, 2019

CBBI said:
Here's a visual explanation.

View attachment 2001

View attachment 2002

By that logic, Garrett is the next guy gone.

I don't buy it. I think things like which GM picked a player may matter for borderline players, or guys whose salary may exceed their utility. But if Dorsey is the kind of guy who will ditch a critical player simply because he's not the one who drafted him, and we don't have anyone who remotely appears capable of replacing him, then we're in bad shape.

Cleveland Browns 2019 Season

Amherstcavsfan

Always a Wine and Gold Winner

Out of the Rafters at the Q

Out of the Rafters

red.

RCF Echo Chamber. #FreeDG!

FrontPageNews

Hall-of-Famer

Ohio

Woosah

FiveThous

All-Star

Juice is Loose

Stylin' and Profilin'

FiveThous

All-Star

Triplethreat

Hall-of-Famer

MirORich

Hall-of-Famer

Triplethreat

Hall-of-Famer

The Human Q-Tip

Alright you primitive screwheads, listen up!

CBBI

Super Chill Mode

Ohio

Woosah

The Human Q-Tip

Alright you primitive screwheads, listen up!

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify