Lee
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Apr 27, 2005
- Messages
- 41,200
- Reaction score
- 62,116
- Points
- 148
Actually they paid around $60 million..... seems to be a little more than a $1 scratcher
Its all relative to a man worth 40-50 Billion.
Actually they paid around $60 million..... seems to be a little more than a $1 scratcher
I think you're misconstruing what my actual point is to begin with.
Yes, top 3 teams all have "140 chances" in the new draft lottery format. However, the 2nd worst record has a 20% chance at the #6 pick (the absolute worst record can't be worse than 5th). So, yes, there is an advantage in terms of being the worst overall record compared to the 2nd worst record. And my point in that regard is --- who's to say we wouldn't have a worse record than GS last year had we not traded for Drummond? We definitely were on a better pace for it pre-Drummond acquisition
And nonetheless, ALL of that is me getting off my entire point to begin with.. What was the GOAL of acquiring Drummond? To win more games? That would have been stupid, so I don't believe that. To see if he fits into our young core going forward? Well he didn't so if that was the reason then it was an obvious fail. To hold onto him until the deadline the next year and try to flip him for assets since he was an expiring contract? Again, if that was the goal then it was also a fail.
What part of the Drummond acquisition and then buyout was not a fail? I guess that's my question with it all.
Drummond became expendable once we acquired Allen. Koby had no way of knowing the Allen deal would happen.I think you're misconstruing what my actual point is to begin with.
Yes, top 3 teams all have "140 chances" in the new draft lottery format. However, the 2nd worst record has a 20% chance at the #6 pick (the absolute worst record can't be worse than 5th). So, yes, there is an advantage in terms of being the worst overall record compared to the 2nd worst record. And my point in that regard is --- who's to say we wouldn't have a worse record than GS last year had we not traded for Drummond? We definitely were on a better pace for it pre-Drummond acquisition
And nonetheless, ALL of that is me getting off my entire point to begin with.. What was the GOAL of acquiring Drummond? To win more games? That would have been stupid, so I don't believe that. To see if he fits into our young core going forward? Well he didn't so if that was the reason then it was an obvious fail. To hold onto him until the deadline the next year and try to flip him for assets since he was an expiring contract? Again, if that was the goal then it was also a fail.
What part of the Drummond acquisition and then buyout was not a fail? I guess that's my question with it all.
Aunt Harriet.Actually AD is LeBron's "Robin"...
Drummond is Alfred the Butler.
Koby trash as hell.
Maybe Dan G. isn’t such a shrewd businessman after all.Meanwhile Aldridge gave back $7.25 million and Griffin gave back $13.3 million ($4.1 million this year and $9.2 million next season). I know Dan has "I'll pay you to get the f*** off my team" money after making $42 billion during the pandemic but Drummond signing for a what he "gave up" to join LeBron has to hurt lol.
Maybe Dan G. isn’t such a shrewd businessman after all.
Meanwhile Aldridge gave back $7.25 million and Griffin gave back $13.3 million ($4.1 million this year and $9.2 million next season). I know Dan has "I'll pay you to get the f*** off my team" money after making $42 billion during the pandemic but Drummond signing for a what he "gave up" to join LeBron has to hurt lol.
Koby needs to go at season’s end! Don’t even let him “touch the draft”Koby trash as hell.
Picking up Drummond seals the deal for the Lakers coming out of the West (if AD is at least 80% healthy). You just added a monster rebounding machine and rim protector! This guy has AVERAGED 13 rebounds a game (4.5 on the offensive glass) and except for his rookie year has ALWAYS averaged double figures in rebounding! Those rebounding numbers meant squat to a sorry ass Cavs team but they will spell NBA Finals to the Lakers
Drummond made it very clear he doesnt want to lose a dime, it really doesnt matter to a fan in the long run, none of it effects us or the team. Its just money to Gilbert and he has never ran the team on nickels and dimes like the Indians. One of the bigger problems is it has been his toy now his son's toy so they are too involved.