With all due respect W&G, nobody said the process was perfect but what seems painfully obvious from your post is that Danny Ferry thought it was. Apparently he waited until the last minute to make a trade and then got left out in the cold because he thought he could get a deal. He gambled and lost, with a $13.5M expiring contract for an NBA team with championship aspirations, now it's time people man up and admit it. These attempts to save face are silly. And I don't know if this was directed at me or not, and if not then whatever but, to call a fan an idiot because he's pissed that a trade wasn't made is totally uncalled for. That's Danny Ferry's job, and as a fan I expect him to perform in that job exceptionally; especially if we're supposed to be a championship caliber team.
I mean honestly, do you think it was wise to pass on Miller/Salmons? You also said you were disappointed that we didn't make a trade... How can you be simultaneously disappointed decisions were made to stand pat and that's then say that's right decision? That seems extremely contradictory to me. I mean, if you were responsible for the Cleveland Cavaliers, would you gamble on making a trade at the last minute or making a smart move initially without being -for lack of a better word- greedy?
Furthermore, I just can't stand how one minute everyone agrees we need to make changes, and now it's Ferry knows what's best. I might not be the GM of the Cavaliers or some insider with secret knowledge, but that doesn't mean I can't be one pissed off fan. As far as I can tell, and without further hard evidence, the Cavaliers front-office blew it. And I'm not the only one that believes that. Until someone can tell me different, with more than just "I know and you don't," then my opinion stands.