• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

2013 Waiver Trade Deadline Thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

AZ_

Hall-of-Famer
Joined
Dec 6, 2007
Messages
40,728
Reaction score
51,466
Points
148
Never too early to start the speculation. But there will be a bevy of pitchers who could be available this year and many of them make sense for this current club should they choose to be buyers.

Jon Heyman posted this article today which breaks down the potential starters available this summer:

Trade market will be filled with starting pitchers, but who?
May 8, 2013 3:22 pm ET


This year's starting pitching trade market has the potential to be a mix of big names, high salaries and surprises.

On the off chance Cliff Lee, R.A. Dickey and/or David Price hit the market (and one GM said he's heard rumblings already that Lee and Dickey might hit it -- though others still doubt it), things will get very interesting.

If none of those three former Cy Young winners ever reaches the trade market, though, there will be more quantity than quality. Without that top-of-the-rotation trio, there should still be a decent-sized number of available arms. A few slow-starting, big-market teams possess proven starters (i.e. the Cubs, Blue Jays and Angels), and that group, a mix of mostly mid-to-back-end guys plus veterans on the downside could be enhanced if a couple more name starters (most notably Josh Johnson and Matt Garza) can make it back from health issues to show they're ready to join the fray by June or July.

Here's the surprisingly lengthy potential trade-bait list, in order based on likelihood to be traded:

1. Ricky Nolasco, Marlins. Hard to say what a player making $11.5 million is still doing with the Marlins (their next highest paid player Placido Polanco makes $8.75M less), with the possible explanation being that they desperately needed to fill out a major-league rotation. Scouts aren't overwhelmed by what they've seen so far (2-3, .414) but it's possible getting out of the Fish tank/cesspool could prove a boon for him, as it did a year ago for the more talented Anibal Sanchez.

2. Bud Norris, Astros. You've got to give it up for any Astros pitcher who's managed to stay at .500 (3-3 with a 3.89 ERA) this "late'' in the season. Better, Norris would have a 2.48 ERA if not for one mid-April shellacking he took in Oakland. The highest paid Astro at $3 million seems ready to go, another plus.

3. Scott Feldman, Cubs. The beautiful thing is that he looked like potential trade bait when they signed him to a one-year, $6 million deal, and looks even moreso now that he has pitched extremely well (3-3, 2.70 ERA). The Cubs are all about acquiring young assets, and perhaps he could bring one back.

4. Matt Garza, Cubs. The Cubs are going to be a theme here, as you'll see. Theo Epstein isn't afraid of a midyear sell-off or the possibility of a second straight 100-loss year, and he has some decent bait, especially if Garza works his way back from his lingering dead arm/elbow issue.

5. Travis Wood, Cubs. When manager Dale Sveum said on Tuesday that Wood is the best pitcher in the game right now, it appeared like Sveum was either giddy or perhaps starting a sales job. He is a team player, after all. Wood (3-2, 2.33) isn't close to the best pitcher in baseball, of course, but the way he's going, they actually don't have to do too much selling.

6. Josh Johnson, Jays. He was expected to be the top free-agent pitcher, but he's 0-1 with a 6.86 ERA and currently out with a shoulder issue. An ace when healthy, that hasn't been often enough lately.

7. Edinson Volquez, Padres. A weak start (3-3, 5.5) has damaged his marketability, but his $5.725 million salary is in line.

8. Carlos Villanueva, Cubs. The North Siders do have a decent rotation, and Villanueva (1-2, 2.85) is doing a very nice job -- though it's uncertain whether someone who's historically been a spot starter would have enough value for

9. Lucas Harrell, Astros. Another .500 Houston pitcher (yes, they have two), he has been a solid pickup for them. One reason he may stay: his salary is very reasonable ($482,000, according to Cots baseball Contracts).

10. Jason Marquis, Padres. Solid veteran at a reasonable $3 million. Or as one GM put it, "He is what he is." He's 3-2 with a 4.25 ERA, which is good for a 0.0 WAR (he might be a little better than that, though).

11. Jason Vargas, Angels. Can't think the Angels give up easily, but they certainly don't look like a contender at the moment. The left-hander makes a surprising $8.25 million but he's solid (1-3, 3.72), and better still, a free agent at year's end.

12. Cliff Lee, Phillies. He's still a star, as his 1.07 WHIP attests (he's 3-2 with a 3.26 ERA). And someone last summer was willing to claim him (OK, it was the Dodgers) and absorb his $25 million salary, and even the $12.5 million buyout at the end. Lee still has about $82 million to go through 2015, which sounds high, especially with the Dodgers quite possibly not being a buyer this time. It's hard to know how much the Phillies are willing to do, too. If available, a game changer.

13. David Price, Rays. Throw out the 1-3 record and 6.25 ERA. If he's available, he's everyone's No. 1 target. He makes a reasonable (for him) $10.1125 million and has another year before free agency and the really big bucks. Hard to see him staying in Tampa long-term, but the Rays obviously

14. Jake Peavy, White Sox. Very talented, professional veteran pitcher, he's coming back Wednesday from a minor back issue (he suffered back spasms after an adjustment). Signed in the winter for $29 million over two years, which could easily be justified by a pursuer.

15. R.A. Dickey, Blue Jays. It's possible it could be a short-lived stay north of the border for the knuckleballer. He's only 2-5 with a 5.36 ERA and was booed off the mound last year, but he's only a year removed from a Cy Young award. His back-loaded $30 million, three-year deal still looks cheap, but that may also be seen as a reason to keep him, especially since "they couldn't get back what they gave up," a rival GM put it about Travis d'Arnaud, Noah Syndergaard and John Buck. The Orioles made a try before the Jays got him in the winter.

16. Kevin Slowey, Marlins. He's pitching brilliantly and if this keeps up (1-2, 1.81 ERA with five of seven starts allowing zero or one run) this "strike thrower” will be highly coveted. Three issues: He's cheap enough for even the Marlins to love him, too ($750,000), they need to maintain a rotation and he's a longtime ally of manager Mike Redmond, who caught his first game.

17. Chris Capuano, Dodgers. Veteran lefty has a history of injuries and doesn't seem so cheap all of a sudden (almost $6 million through the end of the year, including a buyout). More to the point, still hard to see the $220 million Dodgers as sellers.

18. Ted Lilly, Dodgers. Things don't seem to be working out for the veteran lefty in L.A. as they have elsewhere.

19. Joe Blanton, Angels. He's 0-5 with a 5.97 ERA. But, hey, teams have taken him and paid him handsomely before when it didn't seem possible.

20. Edwin Jackson, Cubs. The way he's going (0-5, 6.39), Epstein and Jed Hoyer would have to do some pretty fancy talking to deal the pitcher on a $52 million, four-year deal. Of course, there's always someone who thinks they can solve him.

21. Mark Buehrle, Jays. That he's making $50 million from 2013 through '15 might scare off some folks, and if not his uncharacteristic 7.02 ERA might. He's been about the most consistent pitcher in the game until this year, so it cant be ruled out entirely. One possibility: an NL team might figure he'd do better in that league.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

Always been a huge fan of Cliff Lee, but I don't see the Indians acquire him with his salary.

Would like to add a pitcher before the deadline, though.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

b00bie...do we have the prospects to deal for Price or Lee?
 
It would be quite a ridiculous story if the Tribe ends up getting Lee back, but I don't see it happening. He just costs too much money.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

Lindor could net the Indians David Price, but they aren't going to deal him, and for good reason.
 
b00bie...do we have the prospects to deal for Price or Lee?

The level of prospect we have to give up depends on how much of Lee's salary we'd be willing to pick up.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

b00bie...do we have the prospects to deal for Price or Lee?

Lee yes Price no.

But they won't deal for Lee unless Phili picks up an obscene amount of salary. Given the instability of their farm system, I'd put smarter money on acquiring a middle of the rotation starter like Bud Norris or Scott Feldman.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

I absolutely LOVE Travis Wood. He's the guy I would target.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

I absolutely LOVE Travis Wood. He's the guy I would target.
I always traded for Travis Wood to be my 5th starter in the last few MLB games. I'm like a proud father seeing him pitch well in real life.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

Scott Feldman, Cubs.

Matt Garza, Cubs.

Travis Wood, Cubs.

Carlos Villanueva, Cubs

Edwin Jackson, Cubs

:chuckles:
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

Would be really surprised to see the Cubs actually move Travis Wood, who is under contract until 2017 and set to make a meager first year arbitration salary next year.

But I agree, would love to have him.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

Living down here close to Tampa, don't be surprised to see Price moved.

I don't know what the Tribe has/would be willing to give up, but the Rays will listen to all offers.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

:chuckles:

I'd take Samardzija.

If Philly would agree to take on 5-6 Mil a year and leave us the rest which would be around what, 15-16 Mil, what prospects would Philly be interested in? We offered him around 18 or so right? But that's if they'll agree to shed some of the salary.
 
Last edited:
Living down here close to Tampa, don't be surprised to see Price moved.

I don't know what the Tribe has/would be willing to give up, but the Rays will listen to all offers.

It's too bad the Tribe signed Myers for $7 million...it was a waste of money, and we could have used those savings to pick up a better pitcher at the deadline.
 
Re: 2013 Trade Deadline thread

It's too bad the Tribe signed Myers for $7 million...it was a waste of money, and we could have used those savings to pick up a better pitcher at the deadline.

He pitched much better in his last 2 starts. Much too early to call it a "waste of money" at this point..
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top