el_capitan
Sixth Man
- Joined
- Jan 27, 2009
- Messages
- 1,811
- Reaction score
- 1,820
- Points
- 113
I like the idea of trading #4 with Buffalo. However, my price tag would be outrageous. 12, 22, 53, and a future 1st. Perhaps settle on a future 2nd instead of a future 1st if they throw 65 back in.
However, if you think you can get #18 in a Seattle deal while giving up 33/64 and a late rounder, that also makes sense.
Perhaps, you end up doing both deals and walk away with:
1, 12, 18, 22, 35, 53 and a future 1st.
Then, I package 18 and 22 to get to 7-8 to take Denzel Ward--the price won't be as high with all QB's off the board and 18/22 is more than enough value to get you to 7 or 8.
End up drafting at 1, 7 (Ward), 12, 35, 53 in the first two rounds with a future 1st to boot.
We would have effectively ended up turning 1, 4, 33, 35, 64 into 1, 7, 12, 35, 53 + a 2019 1st round pick. And I think it's totally doable, which is the most fascinating part of it all.
It's a good idea in theory, but I doubt Seattle is trading us 18 until their pick actually comes up. So we wouldn't be able to trade up to 7-8 for Ward, because that will have already happened.