If the Cavs believe Garland and Sexton can play together, then I’m OK with picking him. I’m not the biggest Culver fan, so I would prefer to trade the other pick to Atlanta. We could then slide back and pick Reddish, along with picking up another draft asset.
I'm not a fan of Culver on his own because I believe his best role is as a 3rd playmaker and shutdown defender. I prefer Culver to Reddish because hes more NBA ready and has almost as good upside as Reddish. I prefer Culver to Hunter because of playmaking. If the Cavaliers believe that Sexton and Garland are the future backcourt Culver is the perfect SF to go with them.