Kyrieville
Sixth Man
- Joined
- Feb 13, 2009
- Messages
- 2,666
- Reaction score
- 1,775
- Points
- 113
So, 1 flagrant = suspension and 2 T's = suspension? He *could* get suspended for 2 games in the Finals, if the refs call this fairly (lol).
To piggy back, a flagrant 2 will get him a 2 game suspension.So, 1 flagrant = suspension and 2 T's = suspension? He *could* get suspended for 2 games in the Finals, if the refs call this fairly (lol).
While I agree the defense will not be as sharp, our offense is infinitely better. I started to point out all the statistics that are available to prove why we will be fine, but it became to much work. Check out all of the finals threads and you will see that our offense is on another level right now. You will also find that the defensive ratings of our opponents is exponentially better than the chumps GSW had to face.I don't want to be negative. I really like the Cavs--they match up well and the GSW is a good test, plus their D is not as good as '14-15.
My only fear is the reffing will affect the outcome--I'll stay positive, but I just see GSW getting a few key breaks due to reffing.
If they outplay us they outplay us...win or lose, just play the game fairly...!
Might as well have a unicorn or mythical dragon safari while we're at it
But if they do it 100 times and only get called 5, that's actually a 95% success rate, far better than the 3/4 of the time or 75% they get way with it. It'd really be more like 19/20 of the time they get away with it, assuming the 5 out of 100 data example you used is factual.Also on this, we have to realize the Warriors will commit 100 moving screens a game, no more than 5 will be called. They just simply aren't going to call it often. So it's actually smart of the Warriors because they know 3/4 of the time they will get away with it
Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
I didn't wanna go back and correct it so I was hoping the numbers would just slip past people... lol. Guess notBut if they do it 100 times and only get called 5, that's actually a 95% success rate, far better than the 3/4 of the time or 75% they get way with it. It'd really be more like 19/20 of the time they get away with it, assuming the 5 out of 100 data example you used is factual.
Technically speaking of course....