• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Free Press/Fake Press

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Status
Not open for further replies.
Good news, the house was contacted, as was whoever handles title ix violations at osu and it'll likely be reported as 9 instances of sexual assault to be later used in some asinine statistic in an absurd social awareness class required to take to graduate.

LOL
Stats sure to be cited as facts in some future debate on RCF.
 
The sign was essentially very public and open catcalling. It's pig behavior and can make women uncomfortable. Calling the cops may be extreme but the ladies seemed to handle it fine. While it's not the worst thing in the world I don't see it as something to encourage. Women, including young women on college campuses, live in fear of sexual assault. Every woman seems to have some horror story about a guy who wouldn't take no for an answer. So I can see why the sign pissed some people off.

Anyway, why was that brought up in this thread?



The Trump camp keeps trying to spin his expensive and consistent waste of time Mar-a-Lago visits as evidence that he's a man of the people. So hanging out at a club with other millionaires so you can make more money off membership ($200,000 membership...) is somehow noble? Greedy and elitist asshole, as per usual.
 
Good dodge.

What am I dodging?? I literally logged on to the site, see you tagged me with reference to some dude being enslaved? I'm like, WTF is this shit?

Just wondering after your 10 page argument in one of the other threads if you'd also go after CNN for claiming slavery when there wasn't "ownership" of those people where they were considered property.

I have no idea if they're using the term correctly, I haven't read the story nor do I have time to do so.

LEGAL ownership is not required for people to be enslaved. Slaves exist throughout the world, illegally. Holding someone in your basement and forcing them to work is slavery. You seem to be confusing that concept with chattel slavery. As I recall, you made some asinine comment about Chinese slavery in the United States in which multiple posters explained to you that you were mistaken; just as you conflated indentured servitude with slavery.

Is it your intention to have that argument again?

As usual you fail to stay consistent when consistency challenges a group friendly to your current beliefs.

What are you talking about?

Where am I being inconsistent?

And who the fuck is friendly with my current beliefs that is actively enslaving people?!
 
The sign was essentially very public and open catcalling. It's pig behavior and can make women uncomfortable. Calling the cops may be extreme but the ladies seemed to handle it fine. While it's not the worst thing in the world I don't see it as something to encourage. Women, including young women on college campuses, live in fear of sexual assault. Every woman seems to have some horror story about a guy who wouldn't take no for an answer. So I can see why the sign pissed some people off.

Anyway, why was that brought up in this thread?



The Trump camp keeps trying to spin his expensive and consistent waste of time Mar-a-Lago visits as evidence that he's a man of the people. So hanging out at a club with other millionaires so you can make more money off membership ($200,000 membership...) is somehow noble? Greedy and elitist asshole, as per usual.

I'm actually praying that he moves the Whitehouse to Florida permanently for his 2 terms just to hear people cry.
 
Last edited:
What am I dodging?? I literally logged on to the site, see you tagged me with reference to some dude being enslaved? I'm like, WTF is this shit?



I have no idea if they're using the term correctly, I haven't read the story nor do I have time to do so.

LEGAL ownership is not required for people to be enslaved. Slaves exist throughout the world, illegally. Holding someone in your basement and forcing them to work is slavery. You seem to be confusing that concept with chattel slavery. As I recall, you made some asinine comment about Chinese slavery in the United States in which multiple posters explained to you that you were mistaken; just as you conflated indentured servitude with slavery.

Is it your intention to have that argument again?



What are you talking about?

Where am I being inconsistent?

And who the fuck is friendly with my current beliefs that is actively enslaving people?!

You can't even follow what I am saying. Your response looks unhinged. So far from my point I can't even justify the effort to refute where your brain took you.
 
You can't even follow what I am saying. Your response looks unhinged. So far from my point I can't even justify the effort to refute where your brain took you.

Notorious, I seriously have no idea what it is you're trying to ask me, let alone put forward any argument for you to refute.

You tagged me in a post, put up a screenshot of CNN that says a man was enslaved, and are now somehow calling me a hypocrite and saying that I'm somehow covering for slavers who share my current beliefs?

Does that not sound 'unhinged' to you? What am I supposed to say to this? And in what way am I being "inconsistent?" Moreover, who is sharing my "current beliefs" while practicing slavery?

How is it you thought to tag me into this bullshit?
 
Notorious, I seriously have no idea what it is you're trying to ask me, let alone put forward any argument for you to refute.

You tagged me in a post, put up a screenshot of CNN that says a man was enslaved, and are now somehow calling me a hypocrite and saying that I'm somehow covering for slavers who share my current beliefs?

Does that not sound 'unhinged' to you? What am I supposed to say to this? And in what way am I being "inconsistent?" Moreover, who is sharing my "current beliefs" while practicing slavery?

How is it you thought to tag me into this bullshit?

You and the other members of the radical left here made a big stink that slavery could only happen if people were property. If they made any wage at all or were not property it wasn't slavery. So I pointed out an article about "slavery," according to fake news CNN, where the workers were paid. Unfortunately, you can't be consistent and say CNN is factually wrong.

You just continue your long standing tradition of taking us to massive wall of text, pretzel logic land. This lets you avoid saying CNN, a radical left news outlet, is completely wrong. Even though you argued against a similar arguement from myself and others for 10 pages.
 
Notorious still doesn't understand Gouri is radical left.

Fwiw, Notorious; you're actually correct for once. I read the article, they never call them slaves, just the title. Title is misleading and wrong after reading article.
 
You and the other members of the radical left here made a big stink that slavery could only happen if people were property. If they made any wage at all or were not property it wasn't slavery. So I pointed out an article about "slavery," according to fake news CNN, where the workers were paid. Unfortunately, you can't be consistent and say CNN is factually wrong.

As I said numerous times, I haven't read the CNN article.

You just continue your long standing tradition of taking us to massive wall of text, pretzel logic land. This lets you avoid saying CNN, a radical left news outlet, is completely wrong. Even though you argued against a similar arguement from myself and others for 10 pages.

Fourth time now, I haven't read the CNN article... I know nothing about the situation you're talking about and offered no opinion on it since I hadn't read the news story.
 
At least you'd finally be winning something.

In politics for the last 4 months I'm not only winning, I'm unstoppable.

16830764_1280393588692705_9069059857131986159_n.jpg
 
As I said numerous times, I haven't read the CNN article.



Fourth time now, I haven't read the CNN article... I know nothing about the situation you're talking about and offered no opinion on it since I hadn't read the news story.

Well that is why I tagged you, maybe you'd have noticed if you didn't have an 18 paragraph tantrum.
 
Notorious still doesn't understand Gouri is radical left.

Fwiw, Notorious; you're actually correct for once. I read the article, they never call them slaves, just the title. Title is misleading and wrong after reading article.

They modified the title a few hours later in the article and a few hours after that on their site.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top