"I told the coaches to step aside and said, 'Bron, you take over the huddle.'"

[Pioneer10]

The impressive things about Sloan and particulary Adelman have they've built very successful teams with personnel that have changed rather dramatically. They've also been very good at keeping there teams winning despite major injuries (see Sloan when Boozer is out and Adelman with McGrady/Tmac). Adelman has also reached Phil Jackson territory with his ability to get the most of roleplayers like Chuck Hayes.

With Brown and it's hard to judge him (the right term is to compare him to coaches who have larger samples sizes so to speak) because of how damn good Lebron is. Not only is Lebron ridiculously good he also doesn't get hurt (is currently knocking on every piece of wood I can find in the building).

 

[Green Lantern]

It is really annoying. Just keep spitting in your cup and stay out of the way MB.

Actually he did that time..

 

[AvonCavsFan]

Some here think that when we win, it's only because of the players, when we lose, it's all Mike Brown's fault.

Considering that we have what may just be the best player of ALL time on the team, that statement is probably accurate (just for the record, I really don't think Phil is that great a coach either, he has needed the best players to win..again like I am trying to say, most of the coaches in this league are average, the LUCKY one's become known as great coaches).

Also, when you totally change how your team plays and then you lose the series, who's fault is that? Had we played that Orlando series the way we played all year and lost, then we could have blamed the players. I would have also preferred to have played Boston straight up as well.

And your still skipping over the important things, like the biggest moves we have made this year, our coach did NOT want to make. Where would we be if we went with our coach and kept starting Andy with Shaq?

 

[AvonCavsFan]

as for the Orlando series... that's been dissected here countless times. The Cavs obviously didn't have the right personnel. then they went out and addressed that problem. So now comes the eating of the pie.

What was obvious to me is we played our 6'3" shooting Guard on their 6'10 SF and our 6'8 SF on their PG, then we complained about the match-up. I wish we had just played Delonte on their PG to lock him up and Lebron on Hedo to lock him up. Our best lineup against the Magic played very little in that series. And our front office seems to have agreed by the comments W&G has made.

And this year he has "learned"...or is it that he has been told you need to do these things or else? Which one is it?

 

[Randolphkeys]

I thought you were better than making personal attacks at 3am on a school night, jon.

 

[MoFlo]

Pretty good choice there, given in your last reply to me you somehow came to the conclusion that if Mike Brown whitewashes his comments to protect his trust with the players, that everything he says can't be trusted.

You know how I feel about the situation, I'm not going to keep repeating myself for the hell of it, only for it to fall on deaf ears & have you break everything down again & try to have me say something I didn't really mean, go on to try to prove your point another way to another poster when they point out the same thing I did, but in a better way..

I know, you'll probably go back & look at what I said, quote it, break it down & try to prove yourself right again, but I really couldn't care less at this point.. If you really need to do that, Jon, be my guest, I don't need to "win" that badly.. And honestly, nobody else would give a shit either..

So you win Jon.. You are always right, nobody can hold a candle to you, I give up..

Now I'm done

 

[Jon]

I thought you were better than making personal attacks at 3am on a school night, jon.

I am, that's why I didn't make a personal attack. Rather I called you out for trolling. Pretty sloppy at that:

Appeal To Anonymous Authority:

an Appeal To Authority is made, but the authority is not named. For example, "Experts agree that ..", "scientists say .." or even "they say ..". This makes the information impossible to verify, and brings up the very real possibility that the arguer himself doesn't know who the experts are. In that case, he may just be spreading a rumor.
The situation is even worse if the arguer admits it's a rumor.​

 

[Jon]

You know how I feel about the situation, I'm not going to keep repeating myself for the hell of it, only for it to fall on deaf ears & have you break everything down again & try to have me say something I didn't really mean, go on to try to prove your point another way to another poster when they point out the same thing I did, but in a better way..

You asked me a question about something I said that you didn't think made sense, I answered it. If you didn't want to know the answer, then you shouldn't have asked.

The extra blathering is something people tend to do when they've argued themselves in to a corner and are trying to save face, rather than just say "I see", and move on to other points.

Oh well.

I had higher hopes for you.

 

[Nicky]

If "we" can't play nice, then this thread is a goner. Enough for the personal attacks and your Vendettas, let's get back on track please.

 

[Pioneer10]

Yeah Mike Brown has definitely "proved" he's as good if not better then Adelman