Hurl Bruce
Logmaster
- Joined
- Apr 21, 2005
- Messages
- 14,687
- Reaction score
- 25,983
- Points
- 135
Well at least now we have a concrete date for when he'll be back
If he isn't back then Josh and his agent are definitely on drugs.
Well at least now we have a concrete date for when he'll be back
Well at least now we have a concrete date for when he'll be back
Take your time in Florida for just a bit more, Josh.
View: https://twitter.com/ProFootballTalk/status/1026100332508663808
Sounds like Lane is wrong.What the hell is going on?
To summarize, PFT said what they said above, and Lane Adkins said the Browns put Josh on the "Did Not Report" list because of the reason related to keeping him longer; however, the Browns are saying they aren't changing his RFA status even if he doesn't report Tuesday.
What the hell is going on?
Why would you extend someone that you have under very cheap team control for multiple more years?Yeah I don't believe the Browns are going to force Gordon's hand just to mess around with his free agency status in a year.
Hopefully it doesn't even matter, and this season he balls out so much the Browns sign him to an extension.
I have to wonder, considering all the help and support the Browns have shown Josh, that he would be inclined to give them a favorable deal. Maybe a deal that makes sense for both sides, where the Browns feel comfortable giving him guaranteed money, just as long as Gordon remains clean and out of trouble.
Not sure exactly if that type of language can be put in a contract, though.
So like...what's going on with this guy?
So like...what's going on with this guy?
I believe that he passed a deadline that makes him a Brown for an additional year. The outcome is: he plays great this year and we restructure for a long term deal, but us forfeiting another year of cheap josh Gordon is certainly leverage to bring the contract value down.