• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

POLL: David West vs. Antawn Jamison vs. Troy Murphy

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Who would be the best option?


  • Total voters
    333

GoGetta

In the Rotation
Joined
Nov 13, 2009
Messages
833
Reaction score
737
Points
93
recent reports on realgm say Hornets might have to deal David West and i'm sure ferry is considering it seeing as hes the PERFECT pf beside LeBron and Shaq. of course we've heard the names of Jamison and Murphy too.

Explain your reasoning.
 
David West.

Troy Murphy is slow.
Antwan is like what? 34?
 
And now West is regarded as a bonehead and already past his prime according to Hornets fans. Each has their own ups and down. Can't pick yet. The possibilities of good offensive and defensive plays with these guys are endless.
 
I think West would provide what we need on offense and is also a bit tougher on the defensive end than Jamison or Murphy. Murphy is the best shooter, but Jamison is the best overall offensive player.

Murphy is slow on defense, Jamison and West are both short relative to KG and Gasol.

The only PF that is absolutely perfect is Bosh, with STAT being basically perfect.

All we really need at the PF position is tough defense against the likes of KG and Gasol and the ability to knock down open jumpers (and finish at the rim). We really don't need a Bosh, just a Bosh-lite. Not sure who that is though (LMA?)
 
This is a no-brainer: David West. And it's not even close.

You're talking about a 2-time All-Star who is still in the prime of his career and in just his seventh season in the league. He's a far more versatile scorer than Murphy. Jamison has a better game, but he's also four years older. Even in what some consider a "down year" for West, he's still getting 17 and 7. I'll take 17 and 7 from our PF position right now going away.

Also, West is the only guy among the three that warrants giving up J.J. Hickson. You can't give up Hickson for Murphy b/c Murphy isn't THAT much of an upgrade. You can't give up Hickson for Jamison b/c Jamison is like a decade older than Hickson. But West...you're talking about a bonafide All-Star power forward who can really elevate this team to new heights this year and beyond. His midrange shot from 15 feet will be butter for this team in the playoffs all day, and the Cavs will actually have somebody else who can consistently create his own offense come playoff time.

This is a complete no-brainer.
 
I like David West's contract(kind of, not really)and the fact that his jumper is the epitome of consistent.

However, I've read multiple connected people talk about how CP3 doesn't even like David West. He can't shoot the three, and he has a tendency to disappear and struggle immensely against bigger fours and length really bothers him. He struggles to create for himself although he is crafty in the post at times. He can get to the line a bit as well, but nothing amazing.

I'm going to take Jamison. Even though at times he can be streaky from beyond the arc(he is less streaky inside the arc), I'll take the risk. He's also older, not quite as long of a contract but close. That has to be taken into consideration.

For me, I'm going to still go with Jamison. For one, I think it'll take less to get Jamison. I think we can get Antawn with Z and maybe a pick once Washington decides its time to blow it up. David West is going to cost J.J. Hickson, and we may have to take on either Peterson or Posey as well(Posey might not be a horrible thing) and I also thing NOH is less likely to agree to buy Z out and let him return, they could use a big skilled body who can shoot and hit the glass for 20 minutes a night...Washington has no use for him.

Now for their games...they're both of similar size. Jamison might be a bit longer, West has some more bulk. West may or may not be better defensively. He can't guard "stretch-4"s very well, and has trouble when people get physical with him or when they just plain have size/strength on him. Jamison doesn't guard anybody, but it's less about ability and more about not giving a shit. I think we could mask him efficiently, much like we did with Mo. not to mention his offensive role would be less prominent, so he'd have more energy for the defensive end.

Now like I said, West gets really frustrated by physical or long/strong defenders. Jamison not so much, Jamison is very crafty with his moves and has a plethora of ways to put the ball in the basket...West has really just got a jump-shot and a mediocre post-game.

West should be a better ebounder than he is, although he has been at time.s.he's streaky in that area. Jamison is always a pretty solid rebounder and tends to do well on the offensive glass(particularly tipping in his own misses).

Ultimately I think Jamison is a guy we can give the ball to and have go to work in important games/situations. West isn't, he's a guy who can come through if LeBron goes to work for him and sets him up in crunch time.

Give me Antawn.
 
I'm going to take Jamison. Even though at times he can be streaky from beyond the arc(he is less streaky inside the arc), I'll take the risk. He's also older, not quite as long of a contract but close. That has to be taken into consideration.

Jamison has a contract for the 2011/2012 year, making $15M.

West has a player option for 2011/2012, worth $7.5M.
 
Jamison

Why?

He is the best of the 3. All 3 of them are pretty old so that is what that is. Jamison is best out of the 3 to be a #2 option as well.
 
Jamison

Why?

He is the best of the 3. All 3 of them are pretty old so that is what that is. Jamison is best out of the 3 to be a #2 option as well.
How can you say that all 3 of them are "pretty old" when two of the guys aren't even 30 yet?

Contract-wise, West is also without a doubt the best choice. His contract is frontloaded, so his salary for next year will actually DECREASE. You can't beat that. Plus, he has a player option for $7.5 million for 2011-12 at just $7.5 million. It would be a win-win whether he picked that option up or declined it. If he doesn't, then it's more money to play with that offseason. If he does, you're keeping a 31-year old power forward in his prime at the NBA equivalent of chump change.

Jamison is four years older and has a contract that goes through 2011-12, when he'll be 36! Also, he'll be making $15 million then.

Murphy's good and seems like a good fit, but he's not in the class of the other two guys. With West and Jamison, we're talking about All-Stars. And based on contract and age, give me West over Jamison any day.
 
Jamison has a contract for the 2011/2012 year, making $15M.

West has a player option for 2011/2012, worth $7.5M.

I always confuse West and Okafor's contract length, thanks for the correction.

I still take Jamison.
 
"Other"

The reason being I don't know yet what the Cavs may need come the middle of February, and neither do the Cavs. We may not need to trade at all. Remember Powe? Including JJ, Powe gives us 5 bigs. 4 of them are very proven bigs who can affect the outcome of a seven game series in a big way.

I'm not voting for any of those unless I know for sure who or what or if we need anyone at all.
 
statistically Jamison and West are pretty close. Jamison averages 3.6 points and .8 rebounds more than West but that can be attributed to him playing 2 more minutes per game. their field goal percentage is dead even but west gets the edge on FT percentage and 3-point percetage. he also averages more assists than Jamison even though he plays on a team where Chris Paul dominates the ball. he is also younger and less injury prone than Jamison. i pick West.
 
Count me in on Jamison.People keep looking up his age rather than watching him run like a deer and he is non stop movement.Show me where his numbers have taken a serious decline and then I will say that he is on a downhill slide,you won`t find them.He has the outside shot,is crafty around the hole,rebounds well and is a classy guy.
Get her done.
 
I always confuse West and Okafor's contract length, thanks for the correction.

I still take Jamison.

Jamison all the way. He just provides something that West and Murphy don't. Versatility. He's like Odom in a way, great ball handling for a big and can create for himself. Jamison thanks.
 
statistically Jamison and West are pretty close. Jamison averages 3.6 points and .8 rebounds more than West but that can be attributed to him playing 2 more minutes per game. their field goal percentage is dead even but west gets the edge on FT percentage and 3-point percetage. he also averages more assists than Jamison even though he plays on a team where Chris Paul dominates the ball. he is also younger and less injury prone than Jamison. i pick West.

I think his three point % is a little misleading,he is 4-11 and doesn`t shoot it very often and is a .279% for his career compared to .347% for Antawn.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top