Racial Tension in the U.S.

[David.]

Not 5 Antifa groups...5 "Antifa linked groups". And we're taking The Gateway Pundit's word (see below) for it that they're linked to antifa. And none of the 5 "antifa linked groups" even admitted to taking donations.

Nothingburger.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/the-gateway-pundit/

freedomoutpost.com/mediabiasfactcheck-com-is-about-as-biased-as-it-gets-heres-what-they-arent-telling-you/

http://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/

this is why these are bullshit. they are literally not worth using. they dont address a single argument, they just poison the well. Entirely irrelevant to the arguments positied, which should be judged on their own merit. Not the source.

 

[The Human Q-Tip]

EXPOSED: Hillary Clinton Moved 800K From Her Campaign To Help Fund ANTIFA

Clinton transferred $800,000 from her failed 2016 presidential campaign to Onward Together shortly before announcing the group’s launch in May, documents the campaign filed with the FEC reveal.

Now, today, it has been revealed by Offended America exactly where that money is going:

Daily Caller reached out to five different Antifa linked groups, and only one was willing to deny donations from Onward Together. Soros-linked group, Indivisible, denied receiving financial support from Clinton or Onward Together.




http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/201...clinton-moved-800k-campaign-help-fund-antifa/

Oh hell, considering the conspicuous silence from her or her campaign last summer regarding the efforts to shut down Trump rallies, I'd bet the house they were providing support to such groups/violent activists. Easy enough to do of you go through enough entities, and untraceable.

I'd be shocked if her new group isn't doing the same thing, and that isn't dependent on this story.

 

[The Human Q-Tip]

Join me and OptimusPrime on the dark side!

Son, I was reading Hayek and Rand before either of you were born.

(Now you know how Kyrie felt)

 

[MediumBaller]

freedomoutpost.com/mediabiasfactcheck-com-is-about-as-biased-as-it-gets-heres-what-they-arent-telling-you/

http://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/

this is why these are bullshit. they are literally not worth using. they dont address a single argument, they just poison the well. Entirely irrelevant to the arguments positied, which should be judged on their own merit. Not the source.

Man I remember when hillary would shriek about the fact checkers during the debates. No attempt to debate anything, just demanding that people "fact check." So annoying.

 

[AZ_]

But Antifa isn't part of the democratic party! They just only show up to stop conservative speeches with violence or threats of violence and never Liberal ones and they take money from prominent liberal political leaders. They're apolitical I tell you! Nothing to see here.

There's literally nothing to see.

You're okay believing this without any sources or listing of the groups involved?

Is this the standard were adhering to now?

 

[AZ_]

freedomoutpost.com/mediabiasfactcheck-com-is-about-as-biased-as-it-gets-heres-what-they-arent-telling-you/

http://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/

this is why these are bullshit. they are literally not worth using. they dont address a single argument, they just poison the well. Entirely irrelevant to the arguments positied, which should be judged on their own merit. Not the source.

There you have it.

Hillary Clinton is funding Antifa groups we can't name, with no sources saying she has, no proof of confirmation, no evidence of what groups she provided money to.

Case closed.

 

[TyGuy]

Son, I was reading Hayek and Rand before either of you were born.

(Now you know how Kyrie felt)

Do you have a pair of shoes older than us?

 

[Nathan S]

freedomoutpost.com/mediabiasfactcheck-com-is-about-as-biased-as-it-gets-heres-what-they-arent-telling-you/

http://www.justfactsdaily.com/media-bias-fact-check-incompetent-or-dishonest/

this is why these are bullshit. they are literally not worth using. they dont address a single argument, they just poison the well. Entirely irrelevant to the arguments positied, which should be judged on their own merit. Not the source.

The gateway pundit claimed that those five groups were linked to antifa without citing any evidence. In deciding whether or not to just take their word for it, it's worth considering that they're known to have an extreme-right bias, right?

 

[David.]

Son, I was reading Hayek and Rand before either of you were born.

(Now you know how Kyrie felt)

Woke. Idgaf. You're just an exterior anachronism.

 

[pr26]

The gateway pundit claimed that those five groups were linked to antifa without citing any evidence. In deciding whether or not to just take their word for it, it's worth considering that they're known to have an extreme-right bias, right?

Hey man , don't discredit sources like the libs. Just join in.

 

[David.]

The gateway pundit claimed that those five groups were linked to antifa without citing any evidence. In deciding whether or not to just take their word for it, it's worth considering that they're known to have an extreme-right bias, right?

No. You and I have been over this at least a half a dozen times. The source is not the content. The source is utterly irrelevant as to the content and arguments presented. You don't just get to pull a site that attempts to discredit everything a publication writes to refute every argument. It's illogical.

I just poisoned that sites well with another site. By your logic, your site is now discredited according to two other sites. And no argument has actually been addressed using these sites. We can go back and forth on this all day without accomplishing anything. It's not an argument.

 

[Nathan S]

No. You and I have been over this at least a half a dozen times. The source is not the content.

Alright...next time a far-left website makes an unsubstantiated claim I better not hear a peep out of you

 

[David.]

Alright...next time a far-left website makes an unsubstantiated claim I better not hear a peep out of you

Bro believe me, I call it out when we do it too. Az made a point of calling someone out over here and I did. I don't say a peep about cnn etc in totality. The source isn't the argument, that's a principle

 

[pr26]

Bro believe me, I call it out when we do it too. Az made a point of calling someone out over here and I did. I don't say a peep about cnn etc in totality. The source isn't the argument, that's a principle

When Sam The Bullshit Whisperer posts a trade rumor....do you get excited or wait for a more reputable source to confirm?

 

[OptimusPrime]

When Sam The Bullshit Whisperer posts a trade rumor....do you get excited or wait for a more reputable source to confirm?

Now, I didn't read the article because I don't give a fuck anyway, but did it cite any sources to back up their claims? If they did, then it doesn't matter who wrote the piece, you can find out for yourself if it's true. If they didn't, then it's worthless. I'm assuming that's what Dave is talking about.