Style said:Famous Amos will be famous, playing in the NFL some day. He's just a red shirt frosh, but his time is coming.
He shut down Manningham in a high school all star game. That's when I first started hearing how good he was. Since then, I've heard the coaches were raving about him in practice during his red shirt year, and now I've actually gotten to see him play, as he's in the regular rotation, and he looks good to me.
Maybe, but Donald Washington is ahead of him this year, so my guess is Washington gets Smith's spot and Amos gets Washington's spot. Kurt Coleman (true frosh, special teamer) is also a player and will be in the mix.cavincali said:You think he takes over for Antonio Smith I believe, the guy with the dreads.
Other than having good size, Lauranitis is not an amazing athlete (and could never play CB at this level); however, he has tremendous instincts, is always around the ball, and just makes plays. This is just like Chris Speilman (although Speils was smaller), and b/c they went to the same school people always make the comparison. He's also very good in pass coverage likes Speils.cavincali said:And some of you might scratch your head but I dont think Lauranitis is what everyone is making him up to be. He is good, but not amazing.
Stud. Wilson and Rose are also studs (although not yet at Gholston's level). The Buckeyes are set at DE for the next couple years.cavincali said:Style whats your thoughts on Vernon Gholston
http://ohiostate.scout.com/2/594635.htmlWhat do you tell a Buckeye player after he just played the “Game of the Century”, sold out physically and has achieved a life-long goal? “Good one, son. Now let’s do it again. And it counts this time”.
Lots of others have expressed similar stances. Our man at the betting line, Nevada Buck said:
“Rematch??? Put me in the camp that believes from the bottom of my heart that Michigan was very very fortunate that this game didn't get out of hand. To lose the turnover battle three to zero and still win is amazing. To lose the type of turnovers that we did, and when we did, and still win is even more amazing. Michigan had their shot--they lost---bring on the next victim.”
Even Eagle Scout Charles Babb took umbrage with the notion:
“I think a rematch is terrible. How do you get these young men to have the same motivation as UM if a rematch is demanded by the talking heads? Barton had a cigar and champagne with teammates, Ginn was crying, Smith was thrilled. They won but are going to be told that win didn't matter?”
Sports Illustrated, the arbiter of all taste and opinions in the land of sport said:
".....my satellite dish must have been sending me a different Ohio State-Michigan game than the rest of the nation.
For everyone talking about what a "classic" game it was and how a rematch would be the best match-up in the national title game, here comes the cold water. The game wasn't that close. The Wolverines had a strong opening drive before the Buckeyes showed they were the far superior team. Even with all of that good fortune, Michigan was still down 11 points late in the fourth quarter before being allowed to score a touchdown that put a pretty face on a lopsided loss.”
This isn’t Don King putting on a heavyweight farce. This is championship level college football. Were there rematches after Shawn Springs slipped in ’96? Or after a number of the fluke-ish Michigan wins in the ‘90’s that cost us national championships? I don’t think so. And a “re-match” this year? For what?
I don’t think so…
He went on to say that he hasn't been this big of a Trojan fan since he was single! :chuckles:I am a traditionalist. The OSU Michigan game is all about winner takes it all, loser goes home. From 73 – 75 Michigan lost 2 games and tied one and stayed home for the Holidays as OSU went to the Rose Bowl. From 1995 – 1996 OSU lost 2 regular season games and missed out on the National Title. It is all about the finality of the game. You have to wait another year to beat them – this type of desperation makes the game so much fun as a spectator and player. To replay the game cheapens it and takes away the importance of the first game. So, no, I would not want a rematch even if OSU lost by one point on a controversial play. No rematch!
That said, I believe we would win by a much larger margin if they did play again. We gave them 10 points and the officials helped to keep it close. Troy Smith is indeed a Buckeye legend of Archie proportions!
Style said:One of my most trusted Buckeye confidants said it beautifully in an email to me earlier:
He went on to say that he hasn't been this big of a Trojan fan since he was single! :chuckles:
http://ohiostate.scout.com/2/594635.htmlBig game tricks and treats…How often do coaches draw up “special plays” only too see them come down like the veritable house of cards? The situation has to be right, the deception has to be appropriate and the execution (gulp) has to be first rate.
The classic of its kind was seen in the annual whipping of the Wolverines, pulled off so well that it might not have been as fully appreciated as it should have been. You remember the play – fake the ball into the line on second and short, then go for the home run ball to Teddy Ginn. Perfect.
But just how perfect was it? First, they had to plan for the exact time that it played into Michigan’s and Ohio State’s scouted “tendencies”. That would be a short down and Chris Wells had to come onto the field – their short-down back. Then, with everything in place, they broke the huddle in a sprint, as if to say that they were going to power their way to short yardage or “trick” the Michigan boys with a fast count. That kept the defense off-balance and brought everyone in a bit. But the piece of pure genius? Lining Ted up as a tight end. That’s right – he was lost in the detritus of the short yard players. Then – bang – he was out in the open and running for the promised land.
The pass had to be there, and it was – a little short but on the mark. And there you have it. Trickeration at its finest. Perfectly planned and executed – one of the biggest plays of the year in the biggest game of the year…
* * * * *
And how ‘bout that Beanie when they actually gave him the ball…I was going to write up a Grantland Rice-type opus to sing the praises of that fantastic burst Beanie put on to crack the vaunted Michigan D. Not only did I find myself not nearly in GR’s league, but I also found an already-written paean to that play on our own message boards! Here is a thrilling personal description of a thrilling play:
“I've just watched the run about 15 consecutive times, and I literally cannot get enough. He was quick on the spin -off of Crable!- and his burst through the hole was so freakin' explosive. You can hear Barton's block, Wells showcases a nice stiffarm and.... GOODBYE! His speed was impressive. Wells will make his own mark here, but I remember everyone wanting to compare him to Clarett. We know Maurice was special, but he didn't have that kind of speed.
And then, did anyone notice that, while celebrating in the end zone, Chris still had the ball tucked away? LOL ... Freakin' great. You could tell he's been working on and thinking about hanging on to the ball. He didn't seem to want to let go of it.
Then, the shots in the stands, fans jumping up and down, a huge flag waving in the air, Michigan fans with looks of disbelief - Gives me goose bumps, even after the 15th time of seeing the video.
THEN, the camera shows Wells coming off the field and right into the arms of Eddie!! GOOSEBUMPS!! I'm so happy that Eddie goes to these games and gets so pumped up with the players. What a great influence and positive role model.
AND THEN, just seeing how pumped Chris was as all the other players smacked his pads, high fives, etc. GOOSEBUMPS!! And I just love when he gets to "big brother" Pittman and the look they exchange. How good has Pittman been for Wells?! What a freakin' combo!!
Sorry, I just don't want to come off this high and there was so much going on in those few seconds. Gotta love it!!”
I do love it. And thanks for the memories. Truly, an “instant classic”…