The Trump Administration (just Trump) Thread

[David.]

Maybe this can save some time here

 

[AZ_]

Find me someone who has.

With regards to what, Trump's nefarious policy toward Russia?

That he hired Mike Flynn to head NSA knowing he was under investigation, lied about it and the White House spent three weeks covering for him before finally firing him?

That Donald Trump told James Comey to back off the investigation into Michael Flynn?

That his son-in-law lied on his SF86 security clearance form?

That Jeff Sessions said he never met with Russian officials, but then he did, but he wasn't a part of the campaign, except he was.

That a special counsel has been investigating the President?

If the question is whether there is proof that there was willful collusion, with motive to harm the United States, I'd agree there is no and will be no proof of such an accusation.

But to whine about outlet's covering Trump's nefarious dealings with Russia? This is quite literally their job...

He is the producer at a company whose job is literally only to slam Trump, he hasn't seen any. He explicitly adlknowledges that if there were anything, he would have seen it. And if there were anything good, it would have been leaked.

He hasn't seen any evidence in the research he's been doing as a Supervising Producer for CNN Health?

No shit.

Turns out the janitor hasn't found any evidence either, but Project Veritas isn't falsely portraying him to be an expert on matters that he's not an expert in.

Come on man, this couldn't be any more black and white. He's admitting theres nothing and that hes playing you guys for ratings, candidly . This may be the only time you should actually trust CNN and the opposite is happening. This is his job and he's saying it looks like a bunch of bullshit, ver batim.

This was already answered above, people are copping out behind terms like "collusion" and ignoring the negligence shown on behalf of the administration.

And it is good ratings, because it's fucking terrible politics that should and will continue to be covered.

 

[pl4tinum]

I wonder what Reality Winner is up to right now.

 

[Binkster]

I thought Republicans hated handouts...?
View: https://twitter.com/nataliewsj/status/879681232698822660


People like Jason Chaffetz will no doubt rot in hell someday. Chaffetz (makes $174k/year) criticizes minimum wage workers to forfeit their iPhones to afford medical care but he wants an extra $2,500/month funded by taxpayers?

Huh? Can Republicans even support this kind of behavior?

 

[Huber.]

 

[AZ_]

I truly can't get over people posting this video in spite of how blatantly misleading it is.

These same people consistently complaining about fake news and bias.

 

[Huber.]

I truly can't get over people posting this video in spite of how blatantly misleading it is.

These same people consistently complaining about fake news and bias.

Embarrassed you buy into the CNN ratings game?

 

[caf]

With regards to what, Trump's nefarious policy toward Russia?

That he hired Mike Flynn to head NSA knowing he was under investigation, lied about it and the White House spent three weeks covering for him before finally firing him?

That Donald Trump told James Comey to back off the investigation into Michael Flynn?

Speaking of Flynn... This anonymous source (and therefore 100% credible) had this to say.

“The Flynn leaks were nothing short of political,” one FBI employee said, noting the specific contents of the conversation were known by only a handful of government officials when they leaked. “The leaks appeared to be targeted to take Flynn out.”

Eventually the probe on Flynn moved beyond Russia to questions about whether he properly disclosed foreign payments affecting his security clearance.

http://circa.com/politics/accountab...ainst-michael-flynn-by-launching-russia-probe

 

[AZ_]

Speaking of Flynn... This anonymous source (and therefore 100% credible) had this to say.

http://circa.com/politics/accountab...ainst-michael-flynn-by-launching-russia-probe

This should come as no surprise, as the source was probably aware that he was vulnerable to blackmail while serving the government.


I'm not sure how you ended up on the side of defending someone who was a paid agent of another country, writing op-eds that publicly voiced his paid support of a softer stance on said country.

Someone who lied about communications with Russian officials, another country which paid him handsomely in between government stints.


The Trump administration tried to carry the water on this for three weeks before finally realizing it was a horrendous idea to hire him in the first place and casting him off.


You have to wonder, had these leaks not happened if he'd still be serving the country and making decisions based on his financial interests to other nations.

 

[AZ_]

And again, these people have the audacity to speak on media accuracy.

 

[Binkster]

CNN's Health Supervisor commenting on political coverage he has no part in. Damning stuff.

Thanks for framing it in a way that you can use to your advantage, though. Impressive gymnastics once again.

 

[AZ_]

Embarrassed you buy into the CNN ratings game?

It provides ratings because it's nefarious action on behalf of a presidential administration.


Just as it was ratings when a certain Democratic candidate was dealing with emails, or Benghazi.

Oddly your complaints with regards to the ratings trap were silent.

 

[Huber.]

CNN's Health Supervisor commenting on political coverage he has no part in. Damning stuff.

Thanks for framing it in a way that you can use to your advantage, though. Impressive gymnastics once again.

Is that how they're spinning this one?

It provides ratings because it's nefarious action on behalf of a presidential administration.


Just as it was ratings when a certain Democratic candidate was dealing with emails, or Benghazi.

Oddly your complaints with regards to the ratings trap were silent.

Because that wasn't made up events. It warranted high ratings. (only not from CNN)

 

[Binkster]

Is that how they're spinning this one?

No, no. You see, that's the man's title. He's the Health Supervisor and has been listed as such for some time on their website.

Surprisingly zero spin!

Politics typically deals more in the goings-on of Washington D.C., legislature, and the President's dealings. Whereas health more pertains to the study of disease, medical advance, etc.

 

[AZ_]

Because that wasn't made up events. It warranted high ratings. (only not from CNN)

Mmm okay, which stories have been "made up," specifically.

Which events actually did not happen?