• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Week 6: 49ers @ Browns

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Just finished watching the game. Thank god they don’t review penalties. Those last two on our final drive to go up. Yikes
The hold was ticky-tack, but the defenseless reciever was textbook. I've seen a lot of people complaining about it all over without actually knowing the rule.

Defenseless posture definition below:
  1. A receiver attempting to catch a pass who has not had time to clearly become a runner. If the player is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent, he is no longer a defenseless player
Prohibited action:

  1. illegally launching into a defenseless opponent. It is an illegal launch if a player (i) leaves both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into his opponent, and (ii) uses any part of his helmet to initiate forcible contact against any part of his opponent’s body. (This does not apply to contact against a runner, unless the runner is still considered to be a defenseless player, as defined in Article 7.)
 
The hold was ticky-tack, but the defenseless reciever was textbook. I've seen a lot of people complaining about it all over without actually knowing the rule.

Defenseless posture definition below:
  1. A receiver attempting to catch a pass who has not had time to clearly become a runner. If the player is capable of avoiding or warding off the impending contact of an opponent, he is no longer a defenseless player
Prohibited action:

  1. illegally launching into a defenseless opponent. It is an illegal launch if a player (i) leaves both feet prior to contact to spring forward and upward into his opponent, and (ii) uses any part of his helmet to initiate forcible contact against any part of his opponent’s body. (This does not apply to contact against a runner, unless the runner is still considered to be a defenseless player, as defined in Article 7.)
Amazing how the broadcast crew didn’t understand the defenseless rule and argued there should have been no penalty.
 
Amazing how the broadcast crew didn’t understand the defenseless rule and argued there should have been no penalty.
Olsen's bias showed more than once.

I get it. The play was bang-bang, but it's the definition of the rule. Blatantly arguing against it only creates fan discontent and boosts social media activity. If the broadcast explain the rules, or that jerk off Dean Blandino did; you'd see far less upset people.
 
Olsen's bias showed more than once.

I get it. The play was bang-bang, but it's the definition of the rule. Blatantly arguing against it only creates fan discontent and boosts social media activity. If the broadcast explain the rules, or that jerk off Dean Blandino did; you'd see far less upset people.
Right. The announcers sounded like they were referring to college's targeting rule or something.
 
Best possible outcome in all ways,

Our defense wins us the game with some luck and bad calls that actually went our way.

Walker looks not so good so zero QB controversy...i cant reiterate enough how important both points are with 250 million owed ot Watson.

And no additional injuries!
 
Olsen's bias showed more than once.

I get it. The play was bang-bang, but it's the definition of the rule. Blatantly arguing against it only creates fan discontent and boosts social media activity. If the broadcast explain the rules, or that jerk off Dean Blandino did; you'd see far less upset people.

Blind ignorant rage

In politics and football

Hallmark of the age
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top