• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

What could have been with Mickael Pietrus

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Silky Smooth

All-Star
Joined
Jun 15, 2008
Messages
8,577
Reaction score
5,531
Points
113
If he would of signed here instead of Orlando we would probably be set with this team and keep wally for cap relief. Pietrus can defend, hit a jumper, and is still very young. I know this has no meaning right now but just the thought of him here and not worrying about the height at the SG position would of been tremendous.

Just a thought!!:D
 
Re: What could of been with Mickael Pietrus

I really wanted to get Pietrus here in the offseason, he isn't an overly aggressive offensive player, but can create his own shot, which fits perfectly. He also has better size that Delonte and can defend 1 through 3 and sometimes 4 (I believe he played the 4 some in GS). Very athletic and a good defender as well.

He's only making the MLE, too.
 
king boobie is thatt a delonte west quote?
 
I wanted Piertris, but i dont get all the love at this point. He wouldnt provide us anything more than Delonte is providing now. Delonte is a much better shooter than Pietrus when playing sg, and his defense has suprised. Pietris would give us more length, but overall he wouldnt be a great improvement imo.
 
I have a thought Silky Smooth. Quit posting 600 trade ideas a day about every random scrub in the NBA.

I mean, just think how nice it would be if my RSS feed didn't constantly throw these garbage threads at me.
 
I have a thought Silky Smooth. Quit posting 600 trade ideas a day about every random scrub in the NBA.

I mean, just think how nice it would be if my RSS feed didn't constantly throw these garbage threads at me.

LOL funny thing is I barely post trade ideas anyways. Another thing you can do next time is not read any threads I make. PEACE!!
 
What if we landed KG or Ray Allen? What is we drafted Josh Smith instead of Luke Jackson? What if we had kept Kellena Azubuike from the summer league? What if JaVale McGee was still available when we picked last draft? What if we resigned Boozer?

What do all of these questions have in common? They are all meaningless because hypotheticals mean nothing. It's all in the past, and there is nothing that can change it. Why should we worry about some guy we didn't sign when we have a very good team that is in position to become even better?

These types of thing torture everyone that reads them because thinking about "what could have been" can drive a person mad.

You mentioned that this has no meaning, so why post it?
 
I can count 6 within the last month. Barely my ass.

I want you to find the 6 and post them in here. WTF is your problem. I did or said nothing to you for you to come at me like this. So you can just :gtfo:
 
We'll likely end up with someone much better than him at that spot anyway and for now you can't really argue with the results based on our current record. Whether not having a guy like him hinders us in the playoffs remains to be seen. Ferry still has plenty of time to get a defensive minded SG whether he is a starter or not. I also liked Childress a lot but again, I can't really complain about the current makeup of this team.
 
I want you to find the 6 and post them in here. WTF is your problem. I did or said nothing to you for you to come at me like this. So you can just :gtfo:

All I had to do was look at Page 1 of Trade Ideas, and 6 of them were started by you. As your normal idea tends to be just randomly post a thread about XXX player, and let everyone else figure out the stupid trades that could get them here.

For god sakes, you made a thread about Demetris Nichols. Demetris ****ing Nichols.

Post every play in the game threads if you're trying to boost your post count. But threads like this are absolutely pointless and make you look like a tool.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top