• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

The "What are you playing now?" Thread

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Definitely didn't want to come off as ganging up, bro.. FWIW, I appreciate your opinion...

It's fine, I just don't like arguing in circles on forums, it burns me out after several exchanges because nobody ever gives any ground and when it's me versus multiple posters and it's just you guys high fiving each other, meh. Just a waste of my time. Like I said I've made my opinion as clear as I can possibly articulate. I'll answer any other questions or whatever but I'm done arguing about it.

To your question, if I loved a game but thought its story missed the mark I'd probably give it around an 8. To me that's about what Far Cry 5 is. Maybe like between a 7.5-8.0. I'm a fan of the franchise though, and I completely understand it isn't for everyone which is why I totally get Jack's qualms about the series as a whole.
 
It's fine, I just don't like arguing in circles on forums, it burns me out after several exchanges because nobody ever gives any ground and when it's me versus multiple posters and it's just you guys high fiving each other, meh. Just a waste of my time. Like I said I've made my opinion as clear as I can possibly articulate. I'll answer any other questions or whatever but I'm done arguing about it.

Right, I get how that can be frustrating... Besides, I'm not sure we really disagree all that much here. I get how a 6.5 is a low rating for a good game; and you get how the game could get dinged for not having a compelling story that fits the setting... That's pretty much the whole discussion. :chuckle:

To your question, if I loved a game but thought its story missed the mark I'd probably give it around an 8. To me that's about what Far Cry 5 is. Maybe like between a 7.5-8.0. I'm a fan of the franchise though, and I completely understand it isn't for everyone which is why I totally get Jack's qualms about the series as a whole.

Don't disagree with any of this.. If all we disagree about at this point is what rating the game should've gotten by a matter of degree, then, that's not much of a disagreement.
 
Saw that they released The Curse of Monkey Island on Steam.

That's a buy. One of my favorite games of all time.
 
Is the main character a woman or LGBT?
















:chuckle: j/k... ;)

Thought about saying something about how I'm not sure GoW will make a grand statement about the political climate of the mythical Norse world Kratos inhabits, but decided against it. :D
 
FWIW, I've always liked the stories in Far Cry games so you guys are all wrong. I don't know enough about 5 because I just started, but the villains and locales have always been interesting, and I was always invested in the character's survival. It's not MGS or Witcher, but it's definitely fun enough. Always finished these games without feeling bored. Maybe I just really enjoy liberating outposts and unlocking radio towers. :confused:
 
I know its 4 years late, but Dragon Age Inquisition is really good. The side quests do not feel tedious and that's probably the first time since Skyrim I can say that. Sooo much better than the 2nd Dragon Age. So if you played the 2nd and were turned off by the franchise, this one is worth playing.

The big issue with it isn't really a fault of its own, but The Witcher 3 came out about 6 months later and felt like it was made 10 years in the future. Both are very similar games and DAI got a ton of accolades when it came out (I'm kind of like @Jack Brickman with the criticisms and I'd rate it in the good not great range), but 6 months later it's like the gaming community as a whole just forgot about it.
 
The big issue with it isn't really a fault of its own, but The Witcher 3 came out about 6 months later and felt like it was made 10 years in the future. Both are very similar games and DAI got a ton of accolades when it came out (I'm kind of like @Jack Brickman with the criticisms and I'd rate it in the good not great range), but 6 months later it's like the gaming community as a whole just forgot about it.
Witcher 3 has ruined the rpg genre for me. Set the bar so high, everything else seems like a Playstation 1 game. lol
 
Witcher 3 has ruined the rpg genre for me. Set the bar so high, everything else seems like a Playstation 1 game. lol

It's not just the graphics, which were excellent. It's the incredible way they set up quests, characters and storylines that really brings the world around you to life. A+ game design, some of the best ever.
 
DA: I from what I played still feels like a game I want to play even after The Witcher 3, which is probably my favorite game of all time.
 
FWIW, I've always liked the stories in Far Cry games so you guys are all wrong. I don't know enough about 5 because I just started, but the villains and locales have always been interesting, and I was always invested in the character's survival. It's not MGS or Witcher, but it's definitely fun enough. Always finished these games without feeling bored. Maybe I just really enjoy liberating outposts and unlocking radio towers. :confused:

The villains are usually interesting, but that can only keep you going for so long. The problem is that the main characters are either just entirely nonexistent (like in FC5 and, if I recall correctly, FC2), or they're just utterly boring and barely there (FC3 and FC4). To be fair, this is a problem that hinders the industry as a whole, as very few developers seem to be able to effectively develop compelling main characters in their games. There seems to be far too much of a sense that the player needs to develop their own character, and I think that's largely a mistake, especially in non-RPGs where character customization is limited and/or largely pointless.

Witcher 3 is a perfect example of how you craft a game with an actual protagonist that is a fully developed character, but still allow the player to develop the character over the course of the game as well. Geralt is Geralt, but exactly how Geralt acts in any given situation is up to you, the player. You can choose to be an asshole or you can choose to be a good guy, or you can fall somewhere in between, and the decisions you make throughout add up to determine what ending you get. Now, do I expect every game to be that deep with its main character? No, of course not. But I think more games need main characters like Geralt who are actually interesting and compelling rather than silent protagonists who, by and large, add nothing to games.

This idea that we need a silent protagonist as our character in games so we can become said character is incredibly misguided, and I think it often comes down more to developer laziness than any actual purpose. It can make sense in an RPG where you build your character from the ground up and spend the entire game deciding what kind of character he/she will be, but it makes much less sense in a narrative, mostly linear game. And even in RPGs, I'd like to think the Mass Effect trilogy showed us all that, even in a game where you create your own character, it adds to a game significantly when your character actually gets compelling dialogue and good voice acting. Why does Far Cry 5 need a silent protagonist? It makes no sense. Your character is a cop. Why not make him or her an actual, developed character rather than a silent nobody? I doubt it would make the game anything other than better.

Hell, your FC5 character doesn't even have a fucking name, which is insanely lazy.
 
Bought MLB: The Show....


....but Fortnite is still ruining my fucking life.
 
The villains are usually interesting, but that can only keep you going for so long. The problem is that the main characters are either just entirely nonexistent (like in FC5 and, if I recall correctly, FC2), or they're just utterly boring and barely there (FC3 and FC4). To be fair, this is a problem that hinders the industry as a whole, as very few developers seem to be able to effectively develop compelling main characters in their games. There seems to be far too much of a sense that the player needs to develop their own character, and I think that's largely a mistake, especially in non-RPGs where character customization is limited and/or largely pointless.

Witcher 3 is a perfect example of how you craft a game with an actual protagonist that is a fully developed character, but still allow the player to develop the character over the course of the game as well. Geralt is Geralt, but exactly how Geralt acts in any given situation is up to you, the player. You can choose to be an asshole or you can choose to be a good guy, or you can fall somewhere in between, and the decisions you make throughout add up to determine what ending you get. Now, do I expect every game to be that deep with its main character? No, of course not. But I think more games need main characters like Geralt who are actually interesting and compelling rather than silent protagonists who, by and large, add nothing to games.

This idea that we need a silent protagonist as our character in games so we can become said character is incredibly misguided, and I think it often comes down more to developer laziness than any actual purpose. It can make sense in an RPG where you build your character from the ground up and spend the entire game deciding what kind of character he/she will be, but it makes much less sense in a narrative, mostly linear game. And even in RPGs, I'd like to think the Mass Effect trilogy showed us all that, even in a game where you create your own character, it adds to a game significantly when your character actually gets compelling dialogue and good voice acting. Why does Far Cry 5 need a silent protagonist? It makes no sense. Your character is a cop. Why not make him or her an actual, developed character rather than a silent nobody? I doubt it would make the game anything other than better.

Hell, your FC5 character doesn't even have a fucking name, which is insanely lazy.

I understand the perspective, but I'm not yet sure about how I feel about nameless cop guy that doesn't talk (Hey, they call him "rook" repeatedly!). Don't think it was lazy... just an artistic choice for immersion. Again, jury still out on how immersed I'll feel.

Witcher 3 is so untouchable that it's hard to even compare anything to it... not even fair. Is there another Witcher in the works btw?
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top