FrontPageNews
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2016
- Messages
- 19,251
- Reaction score
- 15,655
- Points
- 123
I think IT could at least run the team when Lebron goes to the bench.
I agree with you, however, the NBA sports writers by making IT all NBA 3rd team would disagree with youNo matter how much we hate Kyrie right now, saying IT is remotely close to Kyrie is asinine.
I think IT could at least run the team when Lebron goes to the bench.
Sorry, but there are just some comparisons where stats don't tell the whole story. IT bloated his status by chucking up 20 shots a game on a team that really had no legitimate 2nd scorer. Kyrie is a top 3-5 PG for most everyone. IT is maybe a top 10 to half of them... not to mention what do we do when he wants a max? Getting IT has to mean he is a 1 year rental. So if we don't get Brown, this pick better be the Brooklyn pick.
Believe it means the Celtics have to send out that much...
Huh? Kyrie put up more shots per game last year then I.T.? And just like you said, I.T. was the only scoring option?
We could do a lot worse than this deal. I'd rather keep Kyrie in the end but doesn't seem likely.
Points per shot in 2016-17:
Thomas (1.49)
Irving (1.27)
Clearly Thomas didn't just bloat his stats by taking more shots. He was actually more efficient.
OR, Kyrie ONLY scored .2 less than the a main offensive threat despite being surrounded by 2 all-stars who averaged 20 ppg or more.Yep. Despite being the 'only scoring option' he actually averaged .2 points more per field goal attempt than Kyrie did. So being the focal point of opposing defenses, he was more efficient than Kyrie.