• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

2017-2018 Boston Celtics: No Irving! No Hayward! No Brooklyn Pick!

Do Not Sell My Personal Information

Regrade the finalized trade

  • A+

    Votes: 20 8.0%
  • A

    Votes: 70 27.9%
  • B

    Votes: 74 29.5%
  • C

    Votes: 39 15.5%
  • D

    Votes: 18 7.2%
  • F

    Votes: 30 12.0%

  • Total voters
    251
what you are describing here is epic incompetence and stupidity by the front office resulting in a crappy trade and leaving value on the table that we could ill afford to lose.

This is also the story Windhorst tells in his comparison of how a good organization (San Antonio) handles a trade demand vs how we handled it -- http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...onio-spurs-handled-trade-demands-worlds-apart. Warning: don't read unless you have a strong stomach.

I don't see how you can accuse Griff of epic incompetence for exploring the trade market for preliminary talks gauging what he could get for Kyrie. I realize you have a vendetta that you're not going to let go, so whatever, I guess.


I like the idea Windhorst ran with but ultimately, and he knows this better than anyone, there is a lot more to it than just the way the organization is run. Kyrie did a lot of things to ensure he got his way that LaMarcus didn't do. LaMarcus didn't promise to hold out, LaMarcus didn't say he would never sign another contract with the Spurs and would leave them with 0 compensation. And also the LeBron factor didn't exist in San Antonio...

So while it was a cute idea, it's comparing situations that shouldn't be compared.
 
I don't see how you can accuse Griff of epic incompetence for exploring the trade market for preliminary talks gauging what he could get for Kyrie. I realize you have a vendetta that you're not going to let go, so whatever, I guess.


I like the idea Windhorst ran with but ultimately, and he knows this better than anyone, there is a lot more to it than just the way the organization is run. Kyrie did a lot of things to ensure he got his way that LaMarcus didn't do. LaMarcus didn't promise to hold out, LaMarcus didn't say he would never sign another contract with the Spurs and would leave them with 0 compensation. And also the LeBron factor didn't exist in San Antonio...

So while it was a cute idea, it's comparing situations that shouldn't be compared.

I certainly was not accusing Griff of incompetence for exploring Kyrie trade ideas. That was a reasonable thing to do. I was accusing the entire organization of epic incompetence for complely botching their relationship with perhaps the second most important/talented player ever to play for the Cavs. Which they did before, during, and after his trade demand. Firing Griff abruptly and out of the blue, when he seems to have had the best relationship with Kyrie, appears to have been one contributing factor to that.

Front office people are paid millions of dollars to judge talent and manage relationships with talent. If you botch your relationship with your players so badly that you can't even get them to sit down and have dinner with you when they want to leave, that's fucked up. The Cavs failed to understand Kyrie's dissatisfaction in advance, when they still could have traded him for more equivalent value, they failed to play softball properly (unable to appeal to him effectively enough to get him even to talk to them), they failed to play hardball properly (unable to assert a threat to either not trade him on his schedule or trade him to a team he didn't want to go to), they failed to negotiate the trade properly. That's a pretty comprehensive set of failures.

Your continued argument that the Cavs were helpless in the face of Kyrie's determination to leave, that they had to let a 24 year old alpha them, walk all over them, and treat them like pussies, even though THE CAVS HELD ALL THE CARDS AND WE WOULD HAVE LOST LITERALLY NOTHING ON THE COURT HAD HE HELD OUT is completely mystifying.
 
I certainly was not accusing Griff of incompetence for exploring Kyrie trade ideas. That was a reasonable thing to do. I was accusing the entire organization of epic incompetence for complely botching their relationship with perhaps the second most important/talented player ever to play for the Cavs. Which they did before, during, and after his trade demand. Firing Griff abruptly and out of the blue, when he seems to have had the best relationship with Kyrie, appears to have been one contributing factor to that.

They didn’t fire Griff out of the blue. It was truly a mutual thing. Griff walked as much as Dan didn’t re sign him. Griff also dug his own grave by shit talking Dan to other teams around the league in the final year he was here. Not sure I could have given Griff the money and power and titles he demanded if I knew he was bashing me to our peers behind my back because we had some fundamental disagreements. Would you want to keep, promote and give a raise to an employee of yours under those circumstances?

Maybe you say since it still may be better for the team...make the sacrifice. I dunno. Easy thing to say.

Also, I can say with 100% certainty Kyrie Irving was going to request a trade whether it was Griff, Dan, Billups, or the ghost of Red Auerbach at that meeting. Remember..Kyrie was pissssed about his name being in trade talks...talks orchestrated by his best buddy Griff!!

Now...if we had retained Griff or had a clearer plan in place maybe that meeting and request happens two weeks sooner which maybe changes the available trade targets...that is a fair criticism 100%.

Front office people are paid millions of dollars to judge talent and manage relationships with talent. If you botch your relationship with your players so badly that you can't even get them to sit down and have dinner with you when they want to leave, that's fucked up.
Huh? What? The Cavs couldn’t get Kyrie to have dinner? Where did you hear this? Lol. Because they had plenty of communication with Kyrie post trade request.


The Cavs failed to understand Kyrie's dissatisfaction in advance, when they still could have traded him for more equivalent value,

They knew he was unhappy at times, but at the same time were they supposed to trade him during their title defense? Are you seriously suggesting that?

Sure, yeah they could have traded him in the few weeks between the Finals loss and request...thy actually had talks about it but the talks never got serious. But Kyrie could have also made his request three weeks earlier...this goes two ways.

they failed to play softball properly (unable to appeal to him effectively enough to get him even to talk to them),

Again...what? No...just...lol

they failed to play hardball properly (unable to assert a threat to either not trade him on his schedule or trade him to a team he didn't want to go to)

They evaluated the situation and determined playing hardball wasn’t a better option. We can argue this all day but Kyrie and his people did a great job leveraging and threatening the Cavs into a situation where they felt they had no choice.

This isn’t a situation where Kyries value today would be higher than it was this summer if he held out for two months and then came back digging it and causing locker room drama.

And Dude...teams he didn’t want to go to pulled most of their serious assets off the table because he would contact them and threaten to leave in 2019. So the Cavs should have taken less out of spite?? Cmon now.


they failed to negotiate the trade properly. That's a pretty comprehensive set of failures.

That’s YOUR opinion, to be clear.







Your continued argument that the Cavs were helpless in the face of Kyrie's determination to leave, that they had to let a 24 year old alpha them, walk all over them, and treat them like pussies, even though THE CAVS HELD ALL THE CARDS AND WE WOULD HAVE LOST LITERALLY NOTHING ON THE COURT HAD HE HELD OUT is completely mystifying.

You’re putting your head in the sand in terms of who had all the cards like you don’t understand the idea of player empowerment and how it’s changed the league and situations like this.

Nothing to lose? Try significant amounts of trade value with every passing week as the season went on... if you don’t see that...I don’t know what to tell you man.
 
what you are describing here is epic incompetence and stupidity by the front office resulting in a crappy trade and leaving value on the table that we could ill afford to lose.

This is also the story Windhorst tells in his comparison of how a good organization (San Antonio) handles a trade demand vs how we handled it -- http://www.espn.com/nba/story/_/id/...onio-spurs-handled-trade-demands-worlds-apart. Warning: don't read unless you have a strong stomach.

I read the article and promptly projectile vomited.

I can’t believe Dan screwed up the management and coaching situation that bad again, after LeBron basically volunteers to come back. Going into the 2017 offseason with no GM in place, and a boob for a coach, was basically inexcusable. Someone has to be in a position to understand where Kyrie was and either repair the relationship, play hardball, or get value for him. The Cavs FO and coaching staff did NONE of those things.
 
@everyone who doesn’t believe IBWT
@everyone who says we should have forced him to play
@LeBron James


Not even happy about being all over this for months. Kyrie is such a cunt that I don’t even enjoy outscooping everyone on this.

Who the fuck wants someone like that on your team...
 
Isaiah Thomas: Cavs Problem Now !
 
Early in the game but Kyrie is shredding the Warriors right now...
 
Kyrie knows that building as well as the Warriors do and it’s showing... His personal playground..
 
Kyrie is a bad man. Basically beating Golden State by himself.

It's depressing as fuck he's no longer here.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top