dark2332
Yeah, I’m thinking I’m back.
- Joined
- Jul 3, 2012
- Messages
- 10,807
- Reaction score
- 21,949
- Points
- 135
Yeah, actually, the more I analyze the Harvard chart, the more I realize that I firmly disagree with it based on true past NFL trades. I think Jimmy Johnson's chart is significantly more reflective of the trades we see.Funny thing is I actually looked at the Harvard draft chart for that. 3rd seemed to be a lot closer to equal value than a 2nd, but I could have been looking at it wrong. Also didn't see anything about a discount on future year picks, which is what could be throwing it off for me.
I mean, shit, according to the Harvard chart if we wanted to go from #12 to #2, it should mathematically only cost us #51.
As we know, that is not going to happen.
So great, now I am questioning everything I've ever known.
What I do know is, if Tampa Bay wanted 12 and came to me with 19 and a future 3rd, I'd tell them to fuck off and we will just take BPA at 12.