• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

2017 NBA Playoffs

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
So, does Zaza get series MVP?

Fuckstick. Rot in hell. May everything become more itchier for you.
 
This is bull shit I've watched 2 good basketball games since April 1st


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
 
I think some people already touched on this subject earlier but personally I don't know if two teams being this dominant over the course of the postseason is good for the league. Obviously I'm glad one of the teams is my team but I just can't remember many postseasons where teams were just dominated like this so often. I definitely don't want to take this run which has easily been the best run of basketball in Cavs history for granted, but I don't know it just feels odd not being the stormtroopers in someone else's triumph.
 
Durant is so fucking worse than LeBron. By a mile.
 
randymoss1881 said:
This is bull shit I've watched 2 good basketball games since April 1st
Click to expand...

All 4 pacers/cavs games were good.

Cavs won by 1 pt in game 1, and the pacers were within 4 pts or fewer in the last 30 seconds of the other 3. All super-close, competitive games that could have gone either way. Heck, the pacers led with 90 seconds left in game 4. That was the most evenly matched series Ive seen in awhile, despite the sweep... What makes a good game in your book?
 
Last edited:
23Lebron said:
Cavs won by 1 pt in game 1, and the pacers were within 4 pts or fewer in the last 30 seconds of the other 3. All super-close, competitive games that could have gone either way. Heck, the pacers led with 90 seconds left in game 4. That was the most evenly matched series Ive seen in awhile, despite the sweep... What makes a good game in your book?
Click to expand...

Tonight's game wasn't that bad. Spurs were competitive and fought. All you can ask for.
 
LMA plays so small.

All of five boards.
 
Pop should've played Kawhi, Kawhi said he wanted to play so hes obviously good enough to play.
Worst case scenario he twists again and goes out, he has the entire fucking off season and the start of the regular season to heal it if need be.

I really don't get this decision, Its the playoffs pop wtf are you doing throwing the white towel, Such a shame we we're denied a Spurs Cavs finals, fuck Zaza because with a healthy Kawhi Spurs finish them off in 5 games after breaking the doors off them in game 1.
 
K1rieIrving>AllOtherPG's said:
Pop should've played Kawhi, Kawhi said he wanted to play so hes obviously good enough to play.
Worst case scenario he twists again and goes out, he has the entire fucking off season and the start of the regular season to heal it if need be.

I really don't get this decision, Its the playoffs pop wtf are you doing throwing the white towel, Such a shame we we're denied a Spurs Cavs finals, fuck Zaza.
Click to expand...

They did this with Tim Duncan back in the day. Spurs value long term career and health over a series. You don't mess with an ankle that has been sprained multiple times.
 
K1rieIrving>AllOtherPG's said:
Pop should've played Kawhi, Kawhi said he wanted to play so hes obviously good enough to play.
Worst case scenario he twists again and goes out, he has the entire fucking off season and the start of the regular season to heal it if need be.

I really don't get this decision, Its the playoffs pop wtf are you doing throwing the white towel, Such a shame we we're denied a Spurs Cavs finals, fuck Zaza.
Click to expand...
Pop knows even with a 70% Kawhi, they’re not beating the Warriors in a series when they were already down 2-0. They might have managed to win a game or two, but they wouldn’t win the series.

It wouldn’t be worth it if they played Kawhi through it and he ended up having career-long ankle issues as a result.
 
Ruggeder said:
To fix this would require a team to be allowed to have one "designated player" who is a star. No team can have more then one unless they draft someone who would be good enough to be one on another team. No team can trade for designated players unless there designated player leaves on the trade. That creates parity and rewards drafting and scouting.
Click to expand...

Nah, you just take away the max salary.
 
Czvosec said:
Nah, you just take away the max salary.
Click to expand...
The problem with no max salary is LeBron would take up approximately 99% of the salary cap.

Unless you’re saying abolish the salary cap as well.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-15: "Cavs Survive and Advance"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:15: Cavs Survive and Advance
Top