Jesus, this again. Look, we shot 12-44 from 3 in Game 3, a fluky and horrifyingly low percentage for us, while they shot 16-33, a hot percentage, and we were still winning with 50 seconds left in that game. If we win that game, it's 3-2, with every home team winning and Game 6 in Cleveland...we were a Korver 3 from the series being as tight as it could possibly be.
I get not being a homer, but I've seen way too many Cavs fans on this site being subjective not in favor of the Cavs, but AGAINST the Cavs. I've seen people say we still would have lost in 2015 if we had Love and Irving, even though we won 2 games, lost one in OT, and lost 3 others that were 5 point games or less in the 4th qtr, and then simply got exhausted because we had no bench because our bench was starting for injured starters. No objective basketball fan would make that claim...so why are some Cavs fans making that claim? I've seen Cavs fans say we would have lost in 2016 if Draymond played Game 5...the same Draymond that played 6 games in that series, and they went 3-3, meaning the Cavs were just as likely to win when Draymond played as the Warriors were (not to mention Love also missed a game, so that evens things out). And I've seen Cavs fans say we were "annihilated, destroyed, embarrassed" in 2017 even though, as I say above, we were a Korver 3 (or just a "bad" shooting game as opposed to a "horrifying" shooting game) away from that series being as tight as it could possibly be after 5 games (I've also seen Cavs fans say it took an all-time great offensive performance in Game 4 just to beat them once...no, it didn't...we won that game by close to 30, and could have missed 8 or 9 of those threes and not set any records and still beaten them...we didn't set records and beat them by only 1 point...plus we had Game 3 won even though our shooting was horrid).