MD13
Formerly howler1313
- Joined
- Jun 27, 2009
- Messages
- 7,266
- Reaction score
- 15,024
- Points
- 123
The way you're approaching the pick with your love for Jamin Davis is just completely the opposite of the way analytics approach the draft. The draft is by nature an inexact science, so analytics are all about maximizing value by establishing guidelines to mitigate risk and maximize reward.I get the history lesson, and yeah he lined up in the box 463 snaps vs 119 in the slot last season. He was used effectively but his full ability has not been tested. He can imo far exceed any concerns due to less tape in coverage. He proved he has the freak athletic upside to become an elite LB running a 4.37 40 (100th PCTL)at 234 lbs. a 42" vert(100th PCTL) and an 11' broad (99th PCTL). another season as a starter and he is a top 10 lock. If they don't take him it's cause he gone already if they know whats good for 'em.
Would Jamin Davis be a no-brainer pick if you know that he'll become a 10-time all pro at LB? Absolutely. But there's a ton of data out there that NFL teams are pretty good at identifying talent pools (1st round, 2nd round, etc) but they're pretty poor at identifying the outliers inside those pools, hence why trade ups always seem to go against the team trading up. I don't see the Browns using their top pick on what is quantitatively a lower impact position (caps the ceiling) on football games given all we know about the way the FO operates. The only reason I'm not crossing off Davis completely is because his athletic testing numbers are such an outlier, but I'm still very doubtful.