- Joined
- Oct 3, 2019
- Messages
- 10,336
- Reaction score
- 29,658
- Points
- 135
The Cavs get a day off without travel and a chance to review Game 1 and made some adjustments.
“You go from [playing] a team that didn’t shoot a ton of 3s to a team that wants to shoot a whole bunch of 3s,” Bickerstaff said. “It’ll take us a little bit of time to just kind of adjust. I think tonight was that night. We’ll watch it, we’ll study it, we’ll break it down some more, get more reps at it and go at it again on Thursday.”
Bickerstaff talked about the need to react quicker on defense and force the Celtics off the 3-point line. Fully 50% of the Celtics shots in Game 1 were 3’s.
Just have to be earlier in our technique and make them put the ball on the floor and try to make them take more 2s. - JBB
But is that even possible with so much emphasis on limiting paint points? Can the Cavs simultaneously guard the interior and contest on the perimeter? - Chris Fedor
“That’s what we’re all trying to figure out,” Strus said.
One of the keys going into Thursday’s Game 2 is trying to turn the plethora of catch-and-shoot triples into off-the-dribble jumpers, with an organizational belief that it will cause Boston’s efficiency to drop. - Chris Fedor
I’m skeptical that making them shoot 3’s off the bounce will result in more misses, but the Cavs are going to try.
It’s kind of the opposite of last series, so it’s understanding where it’s going to come. You were protecting the paint, protecting the paint for seven games, hammering it home. Now you’ve got to get out to guys and it’s not just like it’s two guys. It’s really one through 15. - Max Strus
In addition to defense, better offense has to be part of the equation.
“We got 40 3s up. We only hit 11. We’re getting the looks. I think the biggest thing now is just being able to hit and knock them down.” - Donovan Mitchell
The problem with that is the Cavs are not good 3-point shooters, ranking 19th in 3-point percentage during the regular season. That’s against the entire league. Against elite defenses they’re worse. They only shot 26% on 3’s against Orlando.
One thing that has bothered me this year is the Cavs ranked 10th in 2-point percentage and 19th in 3-point percentage, so you’d think they would emphasize the 2 and take whatever open 3’s were available in the flow of the offense. But the Cavs ranked 7th in 3-point rate - they went out of their way to force up 3’s even though they are below average at long range shooting.
I assumed they figured that if they just keep hoisting them they’ll be a lot better by the playoffs. It didn’t happen.
I don’t see how a team becomes better outside shooters in the middle of a playoff series.
The Cavs know what they need to do. On defense they want to stay closer to the 3-point shooters, reduce the catch-and-shoot 3’s, and force them to shoot 3’s off the dribble and also more 2’s.
On offense the Cavs need to hit their open shots. They missed 31 three-pointers in Game 1. Some were contested with the clock expiring, but others were wide open that they simply missed. They also missed a number of open mid-range jumpers.
Against the most efficient offense in NBA history you need to score a lot to have a chance. The Cavs simply need to hit more open 3’s. When they beat the Celtics in March the Cavs were 20-for-42 on 3’s, or 47%. It’s going to take shooting like that to have a chance against the best offense the league has ever seen.
But they also need Mobley to make those little jump hooks right in front of the rim. He has no touch on those shots; he just kind of shoves the ball at the rim and hopes it bounces in. He needs to develop a reliable jump hook right now, but again, you can’t do that in the middle of the playoffs. He should have been working on a killer jump hook all season instead of shooting thousands of 3’s, which aren’t going him any good now.
The Cavs don’t need to win Thursday but they need to make progress. Tristan Thompson said that in the 2016 finals it took them two games to figure out how to defend the Warriors, but once they did they took four of five.
“You go from [playing] a team that didn’t shoot a ton of 3s to a team that wants to shoot a whole bunch of 3s,” Bickerstaff said. “It’ll take us a little bit of time to just kind of adjust. I think tonight was that night. We’ll watch it, we’ll study it, we’ll break it down some more, get more reps at it and go at it again on Thursday.”
Bickerstaff talked about the need to react quicker on defense and force the Celtics off the 3-point line. Fully 50% of the Celtics shots in Game 1 were 3’s.
Just have to be earlier in our technique and make them put the ball on the floor and try to make them take more 2s. - JBB
But is that even possible with so much emphasis on limiting paint points? Can the Cavs simultaneously guard the interior and contest on the perimeter? - Chris Fedor
“That’s what we’re all trying to figure out,” Strus said.
One of the keys going into Thursday’s Game 2 is trying to turn the plethora of catch-and-shoot triples into off-the-dribble jumpers, with an organizational belief that it will cause Boston’s efficiency to drop. - Chris Fedor
I’m skeptical that making them shoot 3’s off the bounce will result in more misses, but the Cavs are going to try.
It’s kind of the opposite of last series, so it’s understanding where it’s going to come. You were protecting the paint, protecting the paint for seven games, hammering it home. Now you’ve got to get out to guys and it’s not just like it’s two guys. It’s really one through 15. - Max Strus
In addition to defense, better offense has to be part of the equation.
“We got 40 3s up. We only hit 11. We’re getting the looks. I think the biggest thing now is just being able to hit and knock them down.” - Donovan Mitchell
The problem with that is the Cavs are not good 3-point shooters, ranking 19th in 3-point percentage during the regular season. That’s against the entire league. Against elite defenses they’re worse. They only shot 26% on 3’s against Orlando.
One thing that has bothered me this year is the Cavs ranked 10th in 2-point percentage and 19th in 3-point percentage, so you’d think they would emphasize the 2 and take whatever open 3’s were available in the flow of the offense. But the Cavs ranked 7th in 3-point rate - they went out of their way to force up 3’s even though they are below average at long range shooting.
I assumed they figured that if they just keep hoisting them they’ll be a lot better by the playoffs. It didn’t happen.
I don’t see how a team becomes better outside shooters in the middle of a playoff series.
The Cavs know what they need to do. On defense they want to stay closer to the 3-point shooters, reduce the catch-and-shoot 3’s, and force them to shoot 3’s off the dribble and also more 2’s.
On offense the Cavs need to hit their open shots. They missed 31 three-pointers in Game 1. Some were contested with the clock expiring, but others were wide open that they simply missed. They also missed a number of open mid-range jumpers.
Against the most efficient offense in NBA history you need to score a lot to have a chance. The Cavs simply need to hit more open 3’s. When they beat the Celtics in March the Cavs were 20-for-42 on 3’s, or 47%. It’s going to take shooting like that to have a chance against the best offense the league has ever seen.
But they also need Mobley to make those little jump hooks right in front of the rim. He has no touch on those shots; he just kind of shoves the ball at the rim and hopes it bounces in. He needs to develop a reliable jump hook right now, but again, you can’t do that in the middle of the playoffs. He should have been working on a killer jump hook all season instead of shooting thousands of 3’s, which aren’t going him any good now.
The Cavs don’t need to win Thursday but they need to make progress. Tristan Thompson said that in the 2016 finals it took them two games to figure out how to defend the Warriors, but once they did they took four of five.