Chris
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2008
- Messages
- 40,096
- Reaction score
- 26,423
- Points
- 135
PFF rated the Browns roster 32nd this year.
Pretty asinine
PFF rated the Browns roster 32nd this year.
PFF rated the Browns roster 32nd this year.
So you are saying I shouldn't bet my 401k on the Browns making the playoffs while I'm in Vegas this week?
How? The rosters hasn't really changed that much and roster improvement moves like Landry and Tyrod were negated some by JT retiring. Other teams drafted instant starters in the first 2 rounds and the Browns drafted projects that aren't going to help right away or will most likely struggle at first.Pretty asinine
5.5
Tied for worst with Arizona
I mean, Christian Kirk is pretty good, but I don't know that I'd call him a god.Arizona? Didn't they just draft football god?
Other teams drafted instant starters in the first 2 rounds and the Browns drafted projects that aren't going to help right away or will most likely struggle at first.
I don't think I have ever given a disagree, if I have it has been forever ago, but I was close on this one.
#1 Baker - Most likely will not play (A GOOD THING!)
#4 - Ward - Starter and impact
#33 - Corbett - Should be a starter
#35 - Chubb - Will definitely see carries. Can his leg hold up? Sure did when he came back from it at Georgia.
#67 - Thomas - GW has already stated he will be seeing snaps. He will play.
W/e pick Callaway was in the 4th - If he can keep his head straight, he was viewed by almost every "scout" as the best WR in the class. Going to have a major impact? Most likely not. But I don't see why he couldn't on the return game.
That's basically every single pick in the first 4 rounds that will be seeing action/starting. How will they do? No one knows how ANY of the picks by ANY team will do.
What other team completely killed it, as you are pointing to, INSTANT starters, over us? Only ones I can think of off the top of my head may be Broncos, Giants, maybe throw in Patriots?
How? The rosters hasn't really changed that much and roster improvement moves like Landry and Tyrod were negated some by JT retiring. Other teams drafted instant starters in the first 2 rounds and the Browns drafted projects that aren't going to help right away or will most likely struggle at first.
I don't think I have ever given a disagree, if I have it has been forever ago, but I was close on this one.
#1 Baker - Most likely will not play (A GOOD THING!)
#4 - Ward - Starter and impact
#33 - Corbett - Should be a starter
#35 - Chubb - Will definitely see carries. Can his leg hold up? Sure did when he came back from it at Georgia.
#67 - Thomas - GW has already stated he will be seeing snaps. He will play.
W/e pick Callaway was in the 4th - If he can keep his head straight, he was viewed by almost every "scout" as the best WR in the class. Going to have a major impact? Most likely not. But I don't see why he couldn't on the return game.
That's basically every single pick in the first 4 rounds that will be seeing action/starting. How will they do? No one knows how ANY of the picks by ANY team will do.
What other team completely killed it, as you are pointing to, INSTANT starters, over us? Only ones I can think of off the top of my head may be Broncos, Giants, maybe throw in Patriots?
I don't think I have ever given a disagree, if I have it has been forever ago, but I was close on this one.
#1 Baker - Most likely will not play (A GOOD THING!)
#4 - Ward - Starter and impact
#33 - Corbett - Should be a starter
#35 - Chubb - Will definitely see carries. Can his leg hold up? Sure did when he came back from it at Georgia.
#67 - Thomas - GW has already stated he will be seeing snaps. He will play.
W/e pick Callaway was in the 4th - If he can keep his head straight, he was viewed by almost every "scout" as the best WR in the class. Going to have a major impact? Most likely not. But I don't see why he couldn't on the return game.
That's basically every single pick in the first 4 rounds that will be seeing action/starting. How will they do? No one knows how ANY of the picks by ANY team will do.
What other team completely killed it, as you are pointing to, INSTANT starters, over us? Only ones I can think of off the top of my head may be Broncos, Giants, maybe throw in Patriots?
I did not kill the Browns draft. CB is the hardest position to transition to outside of QB, Chubb will be third on the depth, Corbett is raw and is no lock to play but shows promise. How has this roster dramatically improved from last year that should increase the win total from 0 to 5 or 6 if Hue does his job? That was the debate. This is still one of the worst rosters in the NFL.
I don't think I have ever given a disagree, if I have it has been forever ago, but I was close on this one.
#1 Baker - Most likely will not play (A GOOD THING!)
#4 - Ward - Starter and impact
#33 - Corbett - Should be a starter
#35 - Chubb - Will definitely see carries. Can his leg hold up? Sure did when he came back from it at Georgia.
#67 - Thomas - GW has already stated he will be seeing snaps. He will play.
W/e pick Callaway was in the 4th - If he can keep his head straight, he was viewed by almost every "scout" as the best WR in the class. Going to have a major impact? Most likely not. But I don't see why he couldn't on the return game.
That's basically every single pick in the first 4 rounds that will be seeing action/starting. How will they do? No one knows how ANY of the picks by ANY team will do.
What other team completely killed it, as you are pointing to, INSTANT starters, over us? Only ones I can think of off the top of my head may be Broncos, Giants, maybe throw in Patriots?
Where would you rank this roster out of 32?Wasnt worth my time, really.