The Oi
Ahhhh chachachacha
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 50,912
- Reaction score
- 77,185
- Points
- 148
Something tells me there's a guy in here that would be more than happy to poison his well.
Why the fuck is he shirtless?
Something tells me there's a guy in here that would be more than happy to poison his well.
Did anyone ask Robert Lee what he actually thinks, ESPN tried to prevent him from becoming a meme.
Unfortunately that didn't work.
In any event, he'll likely get to cover a better game than fucking Virginia.
ESPN said it was a joint decision; he was just moved to a different broadcast..
At first I was thinking it was bullshit; but after hearing ESPN's side of the story, I get why they did it.. People are acting like this guy was disenfranchised. He just called a different game.
It's obvious why/how this is being used though.
ESPN said it was a joint decision; he was just moved to a different broadcast..
At first I was thinking it was bullshit; but after hearing ESPN's side of the story, I get why they did it.. People are acting like this guy was disenfranchised. He just called a different game.
It's obvious why/how this is being used though.
What was the rational?
AFAIK, my understanding is that both ESPN and the guy, Robert Lee, just didn't want him to become some kind of meme or sideshow at that specific moment.... I don't think they figured anyone would even know... So, AFAIK, they just had him swap with another broadcaster and he covered a different game that day.
It sounds absurd when you first read about it.. like .. c'mon... But I get the idea of both Lee and ESPN not wanting to become part of the story.... If they had like, dismissed this dude or he somehow wasn't going to be in the same job, that'd be insanely offensive. But all they did, again AFAIK, was just swap one game.
“We collectively made the decision with Robert to switch games as the tragic events in Charlottesville were unfolding, simply because of the coincidence of his name,” ESPN said in a statement.
“In that moment it felt right to all parties. It’s a shame that this is even a topic of conversation and we regret that who calls play-by-play for a football game has become an issue.”
With respect to the Robert Lee story, it wasn't Lee who went to ESPN -- it was ESPN (who employed Lee and whom he had every reason to want to keep happy) who initiated the whole change of assignment by going to Lee and "suggesting" the change.
Their own statements contradict any claim that this was just about "protecting" Lee himself:
"Collectively" made the decision? So they didn't just leave it up to Lee. Which of the parties who engaged in "collectively" making that decision had the more powerful position?
All parties? But I thought this was just about how Lee felt? So who were the "other parties" for whom this just "felt right"?