Tocov, honestly, none of this is true.
1) They are not super short.
Curry is 6'3, Klay is 6'7 at the SG (tall), Iggy is 6'6 at the SF (avg), Durant is 6'10 at the SF/PF (tall), Green is 6'7 at the C (short). That's not a "short" lineup, it's a "small" lineup since you're playing 5 guards. But "small" and "short" are being confused and cluttered.. Playing small doesn't mean you're running out 5 short players.
2) They are NOT soft.
Curry is a good defender; he just can't defend Kyrie Irving.
Klay Thompson is a DPOY level defender at multiple positions.
Iggy is a DPOY level defender at multiple positions.
Durant is an All-NBA level defender.
Green is a DPOY level defender at multiple positions.
People saying they are "soft" are confused or don't know the personnel.
3) Zero perimeter players?
This... makes absolutely no sense.
All 5 of their starting lineup are "perimeter players." Steph Curry isn't a perimeter player?
What's going on in here?
4) They did NOT get worse on defense.
This keeps getting repeated. The Cavs picked apart Curry/Ezeli/Bogut/Varejao on the PnR. The Warriors had to play a big to rebound, but it didn't work.
Durant is a better defender than Barnes, and while Bogut is a better rim protector, you're better off with Green playing center for the majority of the game regardless.
Yes, rim protection wise, they are worse. Perimeter defense wise they are better. Net net they are a much better team.
Let's stop pretending people; instead, we'd be better off focusing on stategy and potential trade partners, etc.