BimboColesHair
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2011
- Messages
- 22,779
- Reaction score
- 59,455
- Points
- 148
That's probably true, but there isn't much to go by and any of the top talents could have posted those numbers in such a small sample. I would think, and I'm probably wrong, there a numerous other things that have more influence. Size, speed, EV's, contact %, SO/BB and a few other metrics we typically look at have to have some influence.
How much projection goes into a pick?
But none of them did, and that's why it's a big deal even though it's just 50 PAs. Bazzana, Montgomery, Wetherholt, any of these guys at the top of the draft who played in the Cape this past year, did not post bad numbers. Only Condon. So it becomes a question on Condon but not those 3. It's not a good or a bad thing, it's just 1 more thing that needs checked off on and 1 more thing to add on to the evaluation process that decision makers have to feel comfortable about.
And there are a ton of things that have more influence. The Cape is only part of the evaluation process. Teams aren't making decisions based off of Cape performances alone. But they do know poor Cape performance typically isn't a means to professional success.
Projection is more for HS players than it is for college players. Idea now at the top of the draft if you go college player is to get someone who is good now and can run through the minors in 8-18 months and be an immediate impact in the MLB. Guys like Neto, Schanuel, Langford, Cowser, etc.