doughboy90650
Fisher for 3 ??? BANG
- Joined
- Jul 5, 2009
- Messages
- 1,809
- Reaction score
- 989
- Points
- 113
SC is in a rebuilding year so to say and I really do not think they should be ranked as high as they are ..... the only reason they are up that high is because of the pre-season polls, which shouldn't be taken til the 6th or 7th week of the season ..... by that time you should weed out the crap from the cream ....
I mean, the "voters" had Mississippi and California ranked in the top 10 and had them dominating the college football world and both teams got spanked. And any system where the champ is not determined on the field is not legit .........
the only way to really get the system changed is to stop attending or watching college football. if the chancellors saw the declined revenue and the sponsor did as well, guaranteed, there would be a playoff system within the next few years easily. The smaller schoolsl have a playoff system and they're student athletes; so don't tell me that shit can't work......
I mean, the "voters" had Mississippi and California ranked in the top 10 and had them dominating the college football world and both teams got spanked. And any system where the champ is not determined on the field is not legit .........
the only way to really get the system changed is to stop attending or watching college football. if the chancellors saw the declined revenue and the sponsor did as well, guaranteed, there would be a playoff system within the next few years easily. The smaller schoolsl have a playoff system and they're student athletes; so don't tell me that shit can't work......