Really? I thought my statement was spot on.
when you used terms like "weak" and "sinister" don't expect an outpouring of support that you were "spot on"
Really? I thought my statement was spot on.
when you used terms like "weak" and "sinister" don't expect an outpouring of support that you were "spot on"
i must have missed the kagen thing while i was reading about both scalia and thomas attending a dinner thrown by the law firm that is arguing the case against the health care act
here is your link. so you get to take out kagen, while the dems get to take out scalia and thomas. im pretty okay with that one
Wasn't looking for support actually. I simply stated something I feel history will weigh in on. I just don't think history will show Barack Obama as a very good President. I also think he will be seen as weak. That's my opinion of the future. You can disagree with that and that is more than fine. . . . I'll still call him weak no matter what your opinion is.
you completely ignored your use of the word sinister which has NO place and yet another example of you talking out of your ass
In addition what is your barometer in considering Obama "weak" while continuing to be a Bush apologist. Obama has spent most of his presidency combatting the steamrolling mess he inherited from W.
Sinister because of him doing the obamacare thing when we all knew what his true goal is/was.
and do tell us what you THINK that is
Thanks for telling me I talk out of my ass.
maybe when you develop the self-realization how much you are then you won't act like a wounded child when you get called out for some of the reaching baseless crap you post
I already explained why I think Obama is weak. Of course there are many more reasons why I think that but I have no desire to debate it with you.
of course not why debate when you can make outrageous statements and can't defend them
Bush wasn't good either, but he did have to deal with a Democrat controlled Congress for his last two years.
at last you stop making excuses while backhanded still blame the congress for old stupid is as stupid does shortcomings
He also allowed our debt to balloon 4.5 Trillion in 8 years. Obama has ballooned it almost 5 Trillion in 3 years with two of those years of Congress controlled by Democrats. 4 straight years Congress was controlled by Democrats.
ok easy question there big thinker . . .how much of our current debt is attributable to programs enacted under Obama's watch . . .get back to me on that after you do a little research
has he done enough IMHO to address government spending .. . no, my biggest beef is him not addressing the causes of our financial issues - i.e jobs and economic growth
despite all the partisan rhetoric , no matter how people spin it , government debt and spending is not the primary reason for our economic woes!
I won't be ever debating with you. Let's me make that clear right now.
then do us all a favor take your toys and go home
or better spend some time improving your job skills rather than blaming those pesky liberals for your underemployed status rather than taking responsibility for your life and whining about it on a sports board
I really believe you might want to think about buttoning it up a tad. Just a suggestion.
Do you realize that you're no better than Doug?then do us all a favor take your toys and go home
or better spend some time improving your job skills rather than blaming those pesky liberals for your underemployed status rather than taking responsibility for your life and whining about it on a sports board
Do you realize that you're no better than Doug?
If you want to put forth discussion, then do it, but you haven't. You've simply responded to doug's post. Guess what? If you don't like what he says, then put him on ignore. But damn, stop derailing this thread (and others) attacking him. Act like a fucking adult and discuss the topic.