Jack Brickman
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Aug 12, 2012
- Messages
- 38,456
- Reaction score
- 61,544
- Points
- 148
To boot, we have a minimum we have to spend anyways, so it isn't even costing Haslam any actual dollars, necessarily.
I can get the argument that since teams aren't allowed to trade cash for a pick, it circumvents the CBA in spirit. And maybe they should create a rule that makes this type of trade harder. But it was legal, and was an obvious benefit for the Browns.
Yeah, but who gives a shit if it circumvents the CBA in spirit? It doesn't in practice, and that's all that matters. I don't think the Browns exploited a loophole. I think they wisely took a page from the NBA's book and ate a bad contract for a pick, as bad teams with tons of cap space should have been doing in the NFL for years.