I suppose you can make the logical extreme but I cant?
Depends on what the other person says, doesn't it? Here's the specific comments to which I was responding when I mentioned Josh Gordon:
At the end of the day I'm firmly on the production > intangibles train 10 times out of 10.
If someone is going to make an absolutist statement, then it's perfectly fair to use an extreme example to prove them wrong. I actually added a second one as well -- Antonio Brown -- and
@CBBI jumped right on that and said "sure".
I've never said
anything close to "I'll take intangibles over production 10 times out of 10", or even "intangibles are more important then production". My whole point is that
part of what Landry contributes are experience and a positive veteran presence, and that probably helped our younger receivers improve so much as the season went on. I think it was
@jking948 who pointed out a few days ago how some of the younger receivers run blocked surprisingly well also. I'd suspect that seeing the vet veing willing to stick his nose in there on some running plays probably encouraged them to do so as well.
There also was this statement:
Personally? I believe "leadership and intangibles" from players who aren't QBs is dramatically overstated in importance.
Which I also believe is fundamentally wrong. A guy like Jamal Lewis set the tone for those otherwise rather pathetic Ravens' offenses when they won their Super Bowl. Some offensive linemen do the same thing, and I see no reason why a veteran presence in the receiver room can't have a major impact as well, especially if you otherwise have a lack of experience.
Of course, I also think the value of that decreases over time -- as your other receivers mature and learn to do things the "right way", you don't need the same degree of veteran leadership, and it's not worth the extra money. But at a point in time where we had shitloads of cap space we couldn't otherwise use, and a very raw/green group of receivers, I think it was money well spent.
But I don't expect him to be here on that same contract in 2 years, nor should he be unless his production shoots up.