In all seriousness, having seen the movie.. I really don't get it..
For example, one of the complaints is about L3 being a "feminist?" But L3
isn't a
feminist, she wants to be released from
bondage. That's more to do with the concept of
slavery than feminism; and I think a lot of people forget that both mechanical and human slavery exists in Star Wars.
But a robot protesting it's status of servitude to humans is not new in Star Wars lore. It'd be like people calling HK-47 an SJW if he were included in the film...
I'm not even sure how the term "SJW" applies to the rest of the movie except maybe to the
idea that Lando is pansexual ... but nowhere in the film is that ever remotely explored other than L3 saying that Lando was attracted to her, which is presented as laughable (even if true).
Nowhere do we see Lando acting out pansexuality in the sense of homosexuality in this film; which is what I think people were somehow afraid of.
Instead, Glover and the Kasdans (remember, Lawrence Kasdan
wrote Empire is co-wrote Solo with his son Jonathan) have remarked that to them pansexual simply means there are no boundaries on Lando's sexuality because he would have sex with a droid, an alien, and yes perhaps even someone of his own gender
(oh noes!) ...
I .. just can't see the problem with this? I honestly think it's laughable that so many adult men take exception to the fact that Lando might have fucked an alien or touched a dick in his lifetime.
Like really? Does that really ruin your childhood? C'mon man.. lol!
Solo wasn't great.. was barely good... But calling it "SJW" and saying it's "soy" (i.e. lacking in masculinity) is just ridiculous, don't you think?