FrontPageNews
Hall-of-Famer
- Joined
- Nov 14, 2016
- Messages
- 19,279
- Reaction score
- 15,692
- Points
- 123
RJ was great in the finals. Much better than love. I don't like Lue but that's the last thing I'd criticize him about.
Richard Jefferson should of never started game 4.Just did cos I have the entire series on my desktop. Still don't know what you mean hence why I asked. Score tied 69-69 nearing the end of the 3rd, Love is on the floor from then till we lose control of the game. He plays with commendable effort but we get seriously outhustled and our defense at that point still could not stop them.
I also think you're unfair because Jefferson was a big reason we could match up with them and part of the reason we still played well even with Love's foul trouble in game 6. If anything Lue's trust in RJ proved a turning point
That was pretty on. I suggest you read further to understand why I used his name.
I read the whole post. You lost me (in terms of supporting your post) when you mentioned Brown. Lue isn't afraid to shuffle his rotation when players are playing like shit. That's why you saw guys like Delly, Frye and Moz riding the pine in the NBA finals. It's why you saw DeAndre Liggins starting for JR at one point in the season and Shump at another.
Letting players play through their struggles throughout the course of a single game rather than sitting them or calling a timeout is likely something he learned from playing for Phil Jackson, who used to make the Bulls and Lakers play through their struggles instead of calling for a break in the action. It's not a bad move when you have a team littered with championship vets, which the Cavs possess.
No coach should go un-criticized nor am I advocating for that, but in no way, shape or form is Lue similar to Mike Brown. That's your frustration from watching them give up 130 points and playing LeBron 39 minutes, which is fine to be frustrated over, but Lue is doing fine considering the circumstances he's faced throughout the season.
When it happens more than 10 times in a season and LeBron is close to leading the league in minutes, it becomes a trend. How many times have we lost a lead this season where we had the game in the bag and made it close? And fast too... That's on the coach.
For all the talk about LeBron's minutes, he's still playing the 3rd fewest mpg of his career while getting scheduled rest games. Given all of our injuries, and the loss of some depth in free agency, I think it's understandable that his minutes would see a slight uptick this year.
A trend? I disagree. I chalk up to:
1) Not having a full roster with a consistent rotation since JR got hurt.
2) Having a lot of roster turnover in the last two months
3) Players getting sick / needing rest
4) Regular season boredom
There is zero question that the Cavs have elevated their game each of the last two seasons come playoff time and I fully expect that to happen again. That's why I don't get the over-analyzing and overreacting. It's not about what's going on right now with this time. Get back to me in six weeks.
Ty Lue took over someone elses team and used the game plans and approach that .
The title win doesnt happen without Lue. Blatt had lost the locker room. We never comeback from 3-1 with Blatt. We lose in game 5, Draymond or no Draymond. By a lot. Then we trade Love in the summer for 50 cents on the dollar because Blatt tanked his value.not sure how you can say finals don't happen without Ty Lue because the team got to the finals with less the season before.
as far as the finals. Lue's stubbornness and lack of trust in his players (Love) was a factor in the Cavs blowing game 4 and being down 3-1 in the first place.
This is Lues first full season as a coach and his fingerprints are now firmly embedded on the team.
however the Concept that Lue should be beyond criticism or concern because he coached the team to a championship isn't much different.
Look I was never a Blatt fan but these are revisionist attempts to discredit the guy, who did a commendable job transforming an injured team into the most beastly defensive squad in the playoffs.We also got to the finals in SPITE of Blatt.
Look I was never a Blatt guy but these are revisionist attempts to discredit the guy, who did a commendable job transforming an injured team into the most beastly defensive squad in the playoffs.
Even with everything we had going against us, Blatt had Kerr scrambling for answers. Yes, we have that guy LeBron but Blatt's gameplan was successful until we ran out of gas and couldn't counter GSW's small lineup (anybody who continues calling it that other name deserves to be pistol-whipped.)
Injuries robbed us of a title that year, not Blatt. Anybody who tells me that we'd still only be sitting on one ring fully healthy that campaign has an agenda.
Look I was never a Blatt guy but these are revisionist attempts to discredit the guy, who did a commendable job transforming an injured team into the most beastly defensive squad in the playoffs.
Even with everything we had going against us, Blatt had Kerr scrambling for answers. Yes, we have that guy LeBron but Blatt's gameplan was successful until we ran out of gas and couldn't counter GSW's small lineup (anybody who continues calling it that other name deserves to be pistol-whipped.)
Injuries robbed us of a title that year, not Blatt. Anybody who tells me that we'd still only be sitting on one ring fully healthy that campaign has an agenda.