• Changing RCF's index page, please click on "Forums" to access the forums.

Rate the last movie you saw

Do Not Sell My Personal Information
Suicide Squad - 3/10

Writing this as I watch it because it's better than watching the actual movie, so this is gonna be a long one.

Holy shit was this movie bad. First off, the entire premise is flawed. This is supposed to be some metahuman task force, but half the people on the team don't even have any actual superpowers. Harley Quinn is just crazy. Killer Croc's only power is being really ugly. Boomerang and Deadshot are expert marksmen, but they too have no actual powers. I guess Deadshot has his cyborg eye accessory, but that's not a power, it's an accessory. I don't really see how these guys would be any better than the army at taking out the army of generic bad guys in this film.

The animated version (Batman: Escape from Arkham) made a hell of a lot more sense in this regard, as the mission was more grounded and, thus, a much better fit for a group of criminals. In that one, Waller sent the Suicide Squad into Arkham to retrieve information stolen by Riddler. It's the type of mission the Suicide Squad is suited for...illegal and under the table. Despite being a Batman movie in title, it was really a Suicide Squad film, as they were the main characters and Batman was just there to play his role.

This film is clearly trying to ape the success of Guardians of the Galaxy, but it lacks the sense of fun and charm of that film. The jokes mostly fall flat here, and the characters are all just kind of dicks, but not lovable dicks like in Guardians. You're not really given a compelling reason to care about any of them. Flag, who is probably supposed to play the Peter Quill role here, is just as much of an asshole as everyone else. He's not even remotely likable. There's a scene later in the film where he witnesses Waller kill a bunch of government agents in cold blood and doesn't even blink, and even justifies it after. This is the good guy?!?

Early in the film, when they first encounter the nameless, faceless bad guys (nothing gets the audience invested like faceless bad guys who are just there to be cannon fodder), the soldiers comment that fighting them is useless. Seconds later, they fight them and it's very much not useless, as these bad guys clearly die to gun fire and bludgeoning. Yet, scenes earlier, we are shown the army being completely ineffective against them. It's just dumb, and awful writing to boot.

Stannis mentioned the music, and there, too, it's clear they are trying to piggyback on the success of Guardians. The problem is that it often feels like the music here is just thrown in because it sounds cool. There's no real consistency to the soundtrack like in Guardians, and sometimes they will play multiple different background songs in a single scene. It's the audio equivalent of throwing as much shit at the wall as possible and hoping something sticks.

Another issue is the way this film was rushed out the door. You have all these villains who are in jail, but we never see any of them put there. Harley Quinn is a character who would presumably come in relatively late in Batman's career, and yet we're just meeting her here for the first time. That's a major wasted opportunity, as Harley being turned by the Joker could have been the subject of an entire film, either stand-alone or as the main subplot of a Batman movie, rather than a two minute flashback to start this one. It's not as much of an issue for lesser characters like Killer Croc who would never get to be the main bad guy in a film, but it just seems off to introduce villains like Harley and Deadshot in this manner. The entire first act of the film is devoted to flashbacks about who these characters are, and that's just bad filmmaking. Guardians didn't need a long series of flashbacks to establish each character. They introduced them and we got a sense of who they were through the dialogue and their actions. The only character who got a flashback was Peter, and that was the first scene of the film that established how and why he ended up in space, and also why his music was important to him.

I didn't like how they treated Joker and Harley's relationship either. The Joker I know doesn't give a shit about Harley. She's a means to an end, and that end is chaos. She loves him. He manipulates her. In the movie, he's just pussy-whipped. Individually, Leto and Robbie give good performances, but their love story is cringe-worthy bad. That kind of sums up the film, though. The performances are mostly fine, but the writing is shit and nothing really makes a lot of sense.

And this is kind of minor, but toward the end of the movie it starts raining really hard. The characters are outside for a decent stretch of time, all of them soaking wet. They walk into a bar. The next scene, which follows seconds later and is inside the bar, all of them are completely dry. Harley's hair is a bit wet, but her clothes aren't damp at all. It's shit like this that just feels lazy.

Probably the most hilarious scene in the movie was a flashback where Diablo is having dinner with his family and his wife throws down a paper about a fire he started like she's shocked that the man she married who has a fucking reaper's scythe tattooed on his fucking forehead is a bad guy. It's supposed to be a somber scene, but I was fucking dying. I also hated how they did the "hero moment" during the bar scene when all the bad guys decide to help save the world. These aren't fucking heroes! They're psychopaths, thieves, and murderers! It would have played much better if most of them had selfish motivations for helping. The world is about to be destroyed, so they would help because they don't want to die. Instead, they had dramatic music as all of them walked together to save the world. Fucking awful. Whoever wrote this shit clearly does not understand who any of these characters are. Deadshot is the only one who might plausibly help in that instance, and more to save his daughter than himself.

Oh, and where the fuck were Flash and Batman while this shit was going down? Seems like they really could have helped.

Time to move on to Doctor Strange and be reminded what a good superhero flick is supposed to be like.
 
Suicide Squad - 3/10

Writing this as I watch it because it's better than watching the actual movie, so this is gonna be a long one.

Holy shit was this movie bad. First off, the entire premise is flawed. This is supposed to be some metahuman task force, but half the people on the team don't even have any actual superpowers. Harley Quinn is just crazy. Killer Croc's only power is being really ugly. Boomerang and Deadshot are expert marksmen, but they too have no actual powers. I guess Deadshot has his cyborg eye accessory, but that's not a power, it's an accessory. I don't really see how these guys would be any better than the army at taking out the army of generic bad guys in this film.

The animated version (Batman: Escape from Arkham) made a hell of a lot more sense in this regard, as the mission was more grounded and, thus, a much better fit for a group of criminals. In that one, Waller sent the Suicide Squad into Arkham to retrieve information stolen by Riddler. It's the type of mission the Suicide Squad is suited for...illegal and under the table. Despite being a Batman movie in title, it was really a Suicide Squad film, as they were the main characters and Batman was just there to play his role.

This film is clearly trying to ape the success of Guardians of the Galaxy, but it lacks the sense of fun and charm of that film. The jokes mostly fall flat here, and the characters are all just kind of dicks, but not lovable dicks like in Guardians. You're not really given a compelling reason to care about any of them. Flag, who is probably supposed to play the Peter Quill role here, is just as much of an asshole as everyone else. He's not even remotely likable. There's a scene later in the film where he witnesses Waller kill a bunch of government agents in cold blood and doesn't even blink, and even justifies it after. This is the good guy?!?

Early in the film, when they first encounter the nameless, faceless bad guys (nothing gets the audience invested like faceless bad guys who are just there to be cannon fodder), the soldiers comment that fighting them is useless. Seconds later, they fight them and it's very much not useless, as these bad guys clearly die to gun fire and bludgeoning. Yet, scenes earlier, we are shown the army being completely ineffective against them. It's just dumb, and awful writing to boot.

Stannis mentioned the music, and there, too, it's clear they are trying to piggyback on the success of Guardians. The problem is that it often feels like the music here is just thrown in because it sounds cool. There's no real consistency to the soundtrack like in Guardians, and sometimes they will play multiple different background songs in a single scene. It's the audio equivalent of throwing as much shit at the wall as possible and hoping something sticks.

Another issue is the way this film was rushed out the door. You have all these villains who are in jail, but we never see any of them put there. Harley Quinn is a character who would presumably come in relatively late in Batman's career, and yet we're just meeting her here for the first time. That's a major wasted opportunity, as Harley being turned by the Joker could have been the subject of an entire film, either stand-alone or as the main subplot of a Batman movie, rather than a two minute flashback to start this one. It's not as much of an issue for lesser characters like Killer Croc who would never get to be the main bad guy in a film, but it just seems off to introduce villains like Harley and Deadshot in this manner. The entire first act of the film is devoted to flashbacks about who these characters are, and that's just bad filmmaking. Guardians didn't need a long series of flashbacks to establish each character. They introduced them and we got a sense of who they were through the dialogue and their actions. The only character who got a flashback was Peter, and that was the first scene of the film that established how and why he ended up in space, and also why his music was important to him.

I didn't like how they treated Joker and Harley's relationship either. The Joker I know doesn't give a shit about Harley. She's a means to an end, and that end is chaos. She loves him. He manipulates her. In the movie, he's just pussy-whipped. Individually, Leto and Robbie give good performances, but their love story is cringe-worthy bad. That kind of sums up the film, though. The performances are mostly fine, but the writing is shit and nothing really makes a lot of sense.

And this is kind of minor, but toward the end of the movie it starts raining really hard. The characters are outside for a decent stretch of time, all of them soaking wet. They walk into a bar. The next scene, which follows seconds later and is inside the bar, all of them are completely dry. Harley's hair is a bit wet, but her clothes aren't damp at all. It's shit like this that just feels lazy.

Probably the most hilarious scene in the movie was a flashback where Diablo is having dinner with his family and his wife throws down a paper about a fire he started like she's shocked that the man she married who has a fucking reaper's scythe tattooed on his fucking forehead is a bad guy. It's supposed to be a somber scene, but I was fucking dying. I also hated how they did the "hero moment" during the bar scene when all the bad guys decide to help save the world. These aren't fucking heroes! They're psychopaths, thieves, and murderers! It would have played much better if most of them had selfish motivations for helping. The world is about to be destroyed, so they would help because they don't want to die. Instead, they had dramatic music as all of them walked together to save the world. Fucking awful. Whoever wrote this shit clearly does not understand who any of these characters are. Deadshot is the only one who might plausibly help in that instance, and more to save his daughter than himself.

Oh, and where the fuck were Flash and Batman while this shit was going down? Seems like they really could have helped.

Time to move on to Doctor Strange and be reminded what a good superhero flick is supposed to be like.


So I shouldn't watch it then ? :eek:
 
What are some of the lamest names your friends have named their kids?

Jaxson - The Dad loves Sons of Anarchy...they call him Jax.

LeBron - The Dad's name is LeBron too...dude isn't even French.


Sorry if any of your parents are reading this.
 
Jaxson - The Dad loves Sons of Anarchy...they call him Jax.

LeBron - The Dad's name is LeBron too...dude isn't even French.


Sorry if any of your parents are reading this.

I actually created a thread for this. Jaxon was brought up! @Randolphkeys
 
Magic: 8.5/10

This is a psychological thriller with Anthony Hopkins from 1978. I had it recommended to me by a coworker when I was asking about horror movies/ thrillers I might not have been aware of.

It’s about a struggling magician who adds ventriloquism to his act. As the movie begins, he’s bombing in dive bars and struggling with anger issues. After adding ventriloquism to the act, the dummy becomes the star of the show and as basically an early Jeff Dunham (hate that guy) he explodes onto the Broadway scene, then Vegas, then starts doing the late night talk show circuit and his agent ultimately lands him a TV show. The plot thickens just before he’s going to sign the contract for the TV show and change his life forever.

As you learn more about his relationship with his dummy, the dummy may or may not be alive and it may or may not be murdering people just for the hell of it.

Sounds ridiculous, but it’s really well done. Anthony Hopkins wouldn’t have taken the role if it wasn’t and he absolutely makes the movie. The little subtleties such as him actually being able to do the magic tricks will catch your eye...he truly is a method actor and it’s cool to see him earlier in his career. He would have been 39 or 40 when he was filming it.

Really enjoyed it and it immediately became one of my favorite thriller type movies. Wouldn’t call it a true horror movie.

You will need to buy it on amazon for $15 or get a subscribtion to shudder or torrent.

@gourimoko strongly recommend.
 
Last edited:
Gerald's Game - 6/10

Decent horror movie with a great premise. For those unfamiliar, this is a Netflix original where Carla Gugino and her husband go to a remote cabin on the lake to try to revitalize their marriage. He handcuffs her to the bed and then suffers a heart attack when they have a fight, leaving her trapped with no hope of rescue for several days. Add in a starving stray German Shepherd, some supernatural elements, and a nice dose of body horror and you've got the recipe for an extremely watchable flick. It's based on one of King's more recent books, which I haven't read so I can't draw any comparisons.

I liked the movie, though. It was short enough that it didn't wear out its welcome and, while the very end of the movie was a bit weak, the part where she tries to escape the handcuffs is fucking awesome. I really loved the supernatural elements too, although the last scene of the film kind of shit all over that. It would have been much better if it had ended a scene or two earlier. Probably would have bumped it up to a seven.

Worth watching, though.

Just watched Gerald’s Game. I read the book 15 or so years ago when I was in college (it’s not that recent a book), so I can’t remember everything. But what I can recall is that they nailed the dad/daughter situation, the dog, Gerald’s personality and a few other key elements.

I really didn’t like the very end but I don’t remember if that’s how the book ended.

7/10
 
Just watched Gerald’s Game. I read the book 15 or so years ago when I was in college (it’s not that recent a book), so I can’t remember everything. But what I can recall is that they nailed the dad/daughter situation, the dog, Gerald’s personality and a few other key elements.

I really didn’t like the very end but I don’t remember if that’s how the book ended.

7/10

Ah. Thought I read a review of the movie that said it was a new book. Guess I was mistaken.
 
Ah. Thought I read a review of the movie that said it was a new book. Guess I was mistaken.

Yep. It’s from 1992. I’m honestly shocked it wasn’t made earlier.

I’d really like to see Children of the Corn remade with better acting and Pet Sematary remade with better effects and without a kid running around stabbing people Child’s Play style. So schlocky.

Both movies could have been so much better.
 
Magic: 8.5/10

This is a psychological thriller with Anthony Hopkins from 1978. I had it recommended to me by a coworker when I was asking about horror movies/ thrillers I might not have been aware of.

It’s about a struggling magician who adds ventriloquism to his act. As the movie begins, he’s bombing in dive bars and struggling with anger issues. After adding ventriloquism to the act, the dummy becomes the star of the show and as basically an early Jeff Dunham (hate that guy) he explodes onto the Broadway scene, then Vegas, then starts doing the late night talk show circuit and his agent ultimately lands him a TV show. The plot thickens just before he’s going to sign the contract for the TV show and change his life forever.

As you learn more about his relationship with his dummy, the dummy may or may not be alive and it may or may not be murdering people just for the hell of it.

Sounds ridiculous, but it’s really well done. Anthony Hopkins wouldn’t have taken the role if it wasn’t and he absolutely makes the movie. The little subtleties such as him actually being able to do the magic tricks will catch your eye...he truly is a method actor and it’s cool to see him earlier in his career. He would have been 39 or 40 when he was filming it.

Really enjoyed it and it immediately became one of my favorite thriller type movies. Wouldn’t call it a true horror movie.

You will need to buy it on amazon for $15 or get a subscribtion to shudder or torrent.

@gourimoko strongly recommend.

Hmmmmm.....
 
Blade runner 2049: 9/10

Loved it. I think a lot of the reviews are missing the flip of the Joseph Campbell mythology with K's story: brilliant in a lot of ways both in terms of what it is to be human and the angst associated with purpose come and gone

Yes it could have had more editing but who cares the movie is not meant to be an action movie
 
Alien: Covenant - 4/10

Ridley Scott answers one of life's great questions...how do you make a two-hour movie feel like four?

Everyone in this movie is stupid and they all make awful decisions constantly until it's time for Danny McBride and the chick with the short hair to bail them all out at the end before making another stupid decision that will likely set up the next bad movie in this dying franchise.

About the only positive I can come up with is that the movie looks great. The effects are mostly good and the scenery is pretty. The final confrontation with the alien at the end of the movie isn't bad either, although the ease with which they dispatch the alien is a little weak.

Aside from that, the main problem with this movie is that it gives you absolutely zero reason to care about any of the characters. None of them have any real personality. You wouldn't even know that Catherine Waterson is the main character except for the fact that she looks vaguely like Ripley and thus clearly has to be. She does fuck all for the first hour and a half of the movie before randomly becoming a fucking action hero who is apparently an expert at dispatching xenomorphs in the final thirty minutes.

And because you don't care about any of the characters, their deaths just feel cheap and pointless. There's never any tension because you don't like any of these people, and so you're just sitting there waiting for their boring and inevitable deaths. The best horror films need at least a likable lead, but after her husband (a strange James Franco cameo) dies in the first minute of the film, the one in this film is just sad and mopey during the stretch in the movie where they're supposed to be convincing you to root for her.

Oh, and the fucking flute scene. What the fuck was that? "Watch me...I'll do the fingering" was probably the funniest line in any movie I've seen in the past year. Unfortunately, I'm absolutely certain that wasn't supposed to be comedy. A line like that played for laughs is completely at odds with the dreary tone of everything else. Fassbender deserves a fucking Oscar for managing to deliver that shit without breaking character.

The twist at the end was incredibly obvious as well.

This movie is the quality of Alien: Resurrection but without any of the campy fun. Or any fun at all. It feels like Ridley Scott took a Philosophy 101 course one summer for the hell of it and then decided to ruin the Alien franchise because of it.
 
Oh, and the fucking flute scene. What the fuck was that? "Watch me...I'll do the fingering" was probably the funniest line in any movie I've seen in the past year. Unfortunately, I'm absolutely certain that wasn't supposed to be comedy. A line like that played for laughs is completely at odds with the dreary tone of everything else. Fassbender deserves a fucking Oscar for managing to deliver that shit without breaking character.
Plus, he made out with himself.
 

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Video

Episode 3-14: "Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey"

Rubber Rim Job Podcast Spotify

Episode 3:14: " Time for Playoff Vengeance on Mickey."
Top